370 likes | 582 Views
DPW STRATEGY AGAINST FRAUD AND CORRUPTION. PRESENTATION TO PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE 20 AUGUST 2013. Table of Contents. Introduction Turnaround Strategy Intervention Fighting Fraud and Corruption DPW Fraud Prevention Strategy Key Stakeholders within DPW Protection of Whistle Blowers
E N D
DPW STRATEGY AGAINST FRAUD AND CORRUPTION PRESENTATION TO PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE 20 AUGUST 2013
Table of Contents • Introduction • Turnaround Strategy Intervention • Fighting Fraud and Corruption • DPW Fraud Prevention Strategy • Key Stakeholders within DPW • Protection of Whistle Blowers • Internal Investigations • On-going Awareness Campaigns • Successes • Challenges 11. Proposed Solutions
INTRODUCTION • Presentation on DPW Strategy Against Fraud and Corruption presented to the Portfolio Committee on 21 August 2012 • Some of the challenges that were highlighted during the previous presentation are as follows: inability to account for state properties (asset register) mismanagement of leases negative publicity e.g. SAPS leases adverse reports from chapter 9 institutions e.g. Public Protector, Auditor-General (AG) (disclaimer) unsatisfactory / poor services rendered to Client Departments Wide-spread acting in critical executive positions
Turn Around Intervention • The Minister embarked on process of turnaround Department during 2011/12 financial year. A Turnaround Strategy was therefore developed and adopted; • The strategy focuses on two areas identified by the Minister as critical for the Department ‘s Turnaround Strategy: 1) Fighting Fraud and Corruption 2) Improving business operational performance • Minister’s approach = Integrated Approach • The fight against fraud and corruption is aligned to DPW business operations: - review of the internal control environment - detection interventions e.g. lease audit
Fighting Fraud and Corruption • Fighting Fraud and Corruption identified as a Key Focus Area for DPW – Annual Performance Plan (APP) • Identified as Project 5 of the 23 Key Focus Areas/Projects • Project Team and Steering Committee established • The Charter has been developed and adopted by Steering Committee • High level Project Plan developed – detailed plan to be developed and implemented • Draft Anti-Fraud and Corruption Awareness Communication Strategy adopted by the Project Team – to be presented to ExCo
Fighting Fraud and Corruption • Capacity needed to implement the Project – process underway to capacitate the structure • Fraud awareness directly aligned to the following projects: - Project 2 – Audit of leases - Project 3 – Clean Audit - Project 7 – Supply Chain Management Review - Project 8 – Governance and Performance Management Review Implementation of a Service Delivery Improvement Plan
Fighting Fraud and Corruption Con… • SIU busy with investigations in terms of Proclamation 38 of 2010 • Turnaround Strategy provided funding to allow SIU to continue with their mandate • SIU Independent and engaging directly with the Minister • SIU completed several and still conducting investigations within DPW against allegations of fraud/corruption and maladministration – Cases are reflected in the following slides • Stern action taken against Senior Officials within the Department for completed investigations
Fighting Fraud and Corruption Cont.. • Other Intervention measures As part of the Minister’s Turnaround Strategy / Intervention, funds have been allocated to appoint a panel of service providers, who will conduct investigations within the Department as and when they are reported. It is anticipated that the process will be finalised by September 2013.
Fighting Fraud and Corruption Con… • Other Interventions Measures: • Improved interaction / co-operation with other fraud and Corruption busting institutions - Auditor General (AGSA) - Public Protector - National Treasury
Fighting Fraud and Corruption Con… Internal Interventions: • DPW has a dedicated Unit mandated to promote a culture of anti-fraud and Corruption within the Department • Fraud Awareness and Investigation(FAI) is a Directorate within the Chief Directorate: Internal Audit and Investigation Services (IAIS) • The Unit is mandated with the promotion of the anti-fraud/corruption campaigns within the Department and conducting of investigations on reported allegations.
Fighting Fraud and Corruption Con… • FAI conducts anti- Fraud and Corruptions workshops across the Department targeting all DPW officials regardless of levels • Create awareness on matters related to fraud and Corruption and promote a culture of anti-fraud and corruption • Conduct investigations on reported allegations of fraud and corruption • Refer cases to other law enforcement agencies e.g. SIU, SAPS, NIA etc. • Responsible for review and implementation of the Fraud Prevention Strategy
DPW Fraud Prevention Strategy • DPW has an approved Fraud Prevention Strategy which is being rolled out across the Department. • The strategy identifies basic fraud and corruption prevention measures, which are already in place within the DPW. • Furthermore, it identifies fraud and corruption risks that must be addressed and which could jeopardise the successful implementation of the fraud prevention strategy and achievement of the DPW goals/objectives. • The strategy evolves as DPW makes changes and improvements in its drive to promote good governance, accountability and effectively fight fraud and corruption.
DPW Fraud Prevention Strategy cont.. • The Plan/Strategy will be reviewed in the current financial year and will also deal with the nature of the current challenges. • The fraud prevention strategy however; does not guarantee that the DPW will not be impacted by incidents of fraud and corruption but, is intended to serve as an additional measure to assist in the limitation of the impact of fraud and corruption risks, with a particular focus on creating awareness and promoting ethical business conduct.
DPW Fraud Prevention Strategy cont.. Components of the Strategy DPW’s Integrated Anti-Corruption Strategy is based on the following elements: • Prevention • Detection • Investigation • Resolution
DPW Fraud Prevention Strategy cont.. Prevention • Policies and Procedures • Physical and Information Security • Employee Vetting • Risk Management
DPW Fraud Prevention Strategy cont.. Detection • DPW Register of Allegations • Internal Audit • DPW Employees and Stakeholders Support • Whistle Blowing and Reporting Mechanisms
DPW Fraud Prevention Strategy cont.. Investigations • Internal Capacity - challenge of high turnover and process of filling posts lengthy • Co-operation with Other Agencies
DPW Fraud Prevention Strategy cont.. Resolutions • Improved Controls • Disciplinary Action • Civil Recovery • Criminal Prosecution
KEY STAKEHOLDERS WITHIN DPW • Executive Authority(Minister) • Accounting Officer(DG) • Management • Staff
PROTECTION OF WHISTLE BLOWERS • Whistle-blowers (employees, members of the public and service providers) are encouraged to follow the procedures prescribed in the Protected Disclosures Act (No. 26 of 2000) to be eligible for protection. • No person shall suffer any penalty or retribution for good faith reporting of any suspected or actual incident of fraud and corruption which occurred within DPW, however false allegations made with malicious intentions shall be subjected to firm disciplinary or other appropriate actions.
Internal Investigations SUMMARY OF DISCIPLINARY CASES FOR MISCONDUCT COMMITTED BY DPW OFFICIALS
Internal Investigations INVESTIGATIONS COMPLETED, REPORTS NOT YET SUBMITTED TO MANAGEMENT * The recommended corrective measures above are based on the presumption that for reports currently undergoing internal quality assurance reviews the recommendations made will remain the same
Internal Investigations SUMMARY OF ALLEGATIONS REFERRED TO VARIOUS STAKEHOLDERS / LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES FOR FUTHER HANDLING • Allegations referred to the SIU fell within the SIU Proclamation; • Allegations referred to SAPS were of a criminal nature, that warranted criminal investigations to be conducted; • Allegations referred to other Business Units were reports that were forwarded to FAI and during assessment of such it was concluded that they did not warrant investigations but were rather operational matters / deficiencies and were referred to the relevant business units for further handling; and • Allegations referred to the Provincial Governments, those matters fell within the jurisdiction of the respective Provincial Governments
On-going Awareness Campaigns Awareness Campaigns • Fraud Awareness Workshops rolled-out across the entire Department ( 11 Regional Offices & HO) • Presentations during EPWP Programmes and during engagements with contractors • Public Service Induction (New employees) • Anti-Fraud and Corruption Posters • Articles on Worx-News (Internal Publications)
FRAUD AWARENESS WORKSHOPS Proposed Fraud Awareness Workshops
CURRENT PRIORITIES (CAE/Dir:FAI) Conduct investigations on all outstanding cases reported during 2012/13 FY
CURRENT PRIORITIES (CAE/Dir: FAI) Capacitate the Fraud Awareness and Investigation Unit (fill vacant posts & appoint Secondments) Present Progress Report to ExCo, Mintop and ARMC Development of detailed Project Plans Implementation of project Plans Implementation of Project Plans Tracking system for reported incidents Tracking system for reported incidents of fraud / corruption
Successes • SIU and Internal Investigations • Suspension of officials implicated • Internal Disciplinary Processes Instituted • Criminal Proceedings taking place • Permanent appointments made in Executive Positions
Challenges • Inadequate internal capacity(skill and warm bodies) • Non-compliance to procurement processes still a major concern • Poor internal control environment • High level of susceptibly to fraud/corruption
Proposed Solutions • Turnaround intervention initiatives • Establishment of Governance and SCM Branches • Filling of vacant positions and obtaining external assistance to enhance internal capacity • Establishment of stand alone Anti-Corruption Unit • Promote Ethics within the Organisation • Intensified roll-out of the Fraud Awareness Campaign • Aligning the fight against Fraud and Corruption with Departmental operational effectiveness