1 / 53

Is General Relativity correct theory of gravitation?

Is General Relativity correct theory of gravitation?. Numerous tests of GR exist in weak fields Precession of orbit of Mercury Bending of star light at solar eclipse Gravitational lenses Binary Pulsar Frame dragging (LAGEOS, Gravity Probe B) ‏

baba
Download Presentation

Is General Relativity correct theory of gravitation?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Is General Relativity correct theory of gravitation? • Numerous tests of GR exist in weak fields • Precession of orbit of Mercury • Bending of star light at solar eclipse • Gravitational lenses • Binary Pulsar • Frame dragging (LAGEOS, Gravity Probe B)‏ • New Test: Precession of orbit & emission of gravitational waves in OJ287 • Strong field -> Black holes

  2. OJ 287 A Binary Black Hole System Sillanpää et al. 1988, Lehto & Valtonen1996, Sundelius et al. 1997

  3. .

  4. Unique solution of the timing problem • Six well timed outburts • Iterative code • Astrophysical effects: disk bending, delay of radiation burst

  5. 2005 outburst

  6. Predictions for 2007 Sept no gravitational radiation: Oct 4 • OJ 287 timing models • eccentricity • 0.668 0.668 0.6667 0.655 • precession • 37.0 36.9 37.0 39.2 • delay • 0.75 0.70 0.75 1.0 • 1913.01 • 1956.27 1956.18 1956.24 1956.97 • 1963.74 1963.81 1963.69 1964.02 • 1972.97 1972.97 1972.97 1972.97 • 1984.15 1984.15 1984.15 1984.14 • 1994.66 1994.66 1994.65 1994.60 • 1995.85 1995.85 1995.85 1995.88 • 2005.78 2005.78 2005.77 2005.76 • 2007.68 2007.68 2007.69 2007.70 • Sept 5 Sept 5 Sept 9 Sept 13

  7. Harvard plates: Basta & Hudec

  8. 1963-1964: new data

  9. OJ287 in September 2007

  10. Future optical light curve

  11. OJ 287 optical variations 1. Jet wobble, 60 yr cycle + 12 yr steps 2. Tidal variations in jet flow, 12 yr cycle 3. Disk impacts, advance relative to the 12 year cycle due to precession Complete solution of the problem: timing of 6 outbursts

  12. Jet wobble

  13. From jet wobble to magnitude variations

  14. Tidal variations in jet flow: 1972

  15. Tidal variations in jet flow: 1996

  16. In radio: two processes

  17. Three processes vs. optical light curve

  18. . No outburst in hard X-rays; outburst in soft X-rays

  19. At outburst

  20. Pre-outburst

  21. Predictions: rotation of radio jet • .

  22. .

  23. Radio jet P.A.

  24. RADIO JET ORIENTATION AND THE PRECESSING BINARY BLACK HOLE MODEL OF OJ287 M.J. VALTONEN, K.WIIK AND T.SAVOLAINEN Department of Physics and Tuorla Observatory, University of Turku, Finland

  25. Under preparation The structure of the November 2005 outburst in OJ287 and the precessing binary black hole model Mauri Valtonen1, Mark Kidger2,3, Harry Lehto4 & Gary Poyner5

  26. Binary model

  27. 1983, 1994 & 2005 outbursts • Time scales: 0.06 yr, 0.08 yr, 0.12 yr

  28. Predictions: historical light curve outburst in 1956

  29. 2005 outburst twice as long as 1983 outburst

  30. 1983, 1994 & 2005 outbursts • Time scales: 22 d, 29 d, 45 d Relative timing: 1982.99 1994.72 2005.77

  31. After outburst light curve • 1 time unit = 0.06 yr

  32. Structure the same in 2005 as in 1983, but a factor of two slower • 3 peak structure The structure of the November 2005 outburst in OJ287 and the precessing binary black hole model[1] Mauri Valtonen1,2, Mark Kidger3,4, Harry Lehto1,5 & Gary Poyner6 [1] Prepared in part with observations from the Bradford Robotic Telescope at the Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias’s Teide Observatory.

  33. 2005 & 1983: same total energy 2005: 4 months; 1983: 2 months, 2x brighter

More Related