1 / 19

JUDGES MEETING

JUDGES MEETING. Judges Meeting. The Judges Meeting Each Team will be assigned a date and time. Each Senior Examiner will be expected to present their process and findings in a standard format presentation.

bailey
Download Presentation

JUDGES MEETING

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. JUDGES MEETING

  2. Judges Meeting • The Judges Meeting • Each Team will be assigned a date and time. • Each Senior Examiner will be expected to present their process and findings in a standard format presentation. • The Senior Examiner may appear in person, or by telephone (the presentation will be run for them at the Judges Meeting site). • The Support Senior, and/or SIT are welcome and encouraged to sit in as a learning experience. • Senior travel expenses are not reimbursed.

  3. Judges Meeting Presentation (Format Example)

  4. Application Name and Number

  5. Examination Team

  6. Examination Process Issues • Anything that happened during the pre-Site Visit Examination Process that was out of the ordinary, or a process issue that should be brought to the attention of the Judges

  7. Site Visit Process Issues • Any special challenges, process upsets, or anything that occurred during (or after) the Site Visit that was or potentially was a problem, or any issue that should be brought to the attention of the Judges

  8. Applicant Overview & Key Factors- SAMPLE • Large Manufacturing operation facility located in San Diego • 2,200 employees • 15 major product lines • Serve the west coast widget market • $37 million annual budget • Three market segments (educational, government, and industrial widgets) • 1,200 suppliers • Regulated by EPA, OSHA, and FDA

  9. Applicant Key Role Model Behaviors- SAMPLE • Senior Leadership • Process Management • Community Involvement • Training

  10. Applicant Key Opportunities for Improvement- SAMPLE • Extent of deployment: not across all sites as appropriate • Several practices but not always overall systematic approach • Collecting lots of data, but no systematic approach to using results for evaluating performance and improvement

  11. Site Visit • Length of Site Visit (time actually on site) • If multiple sites, those visited and the basis for their selection • Approaches used to evaluate sites not visited • Approximate number of employees interviewed (categories, shifts, etc.) • Interviews with Leadership and other significant individuals/teams • Other relevant information affecting the site visit

  12. Major Site Visit Issues Going to Site Visit- Sample • Absence of results • Absence of action plans: “available on site” • Verify extent of deployment across all sites as appropriate • Verify systematic approach to improvements

  13. Major Site Visit Findings- Sample • Substantial competitive comparative data is lacking • Scores were reduced in many data areas, due to the lack of competitive data • Validated the deployment of refined Business and Support Processes

  14. Site Visit Scoring Changes Items that changed a Score Band.

  15. Score History • Stage 1, Individual Examiner Average Score = 538 • Stage 2, Consensus Score = 554 • Stage 3, Site Visit Final Score = 572 • Score Range = 551 – 650 • Team Award Recommendation = Silver

  16. Examination Process Strengths • Examination Process Strengths in general or specific process strengths. • Processes that worked unusually well in this examination.

  17. Examination Process OFIs • Opportunities where the Examination Process in general could be improved. • Something that happened in this particular examination process that could have been handled better.

  18. WRAP UP • Questions? • Comments?

  19. Thank You!

More Related