1 / 5

LoST discussion

LoST discussion. Oct. 11, 2011 Henning Schulzrinne. urn:nena:service:sos.psap. What happens if accessed from outside (“local”) ESInet ? May violate “same result regardless of where you start” principle! What if multiple ESInets are interconnected?

bailey
Download Presentation

LoST discussion

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. LoST discussion Oct. 11, 2011 Henning Schulzrinne

  2. urn:nena:service:sos.psap • What happens if accessed from outside (“local”) ESInet? • May violate “same result regardless of where you start” principle! • What if multiple ESInets are interconnected? • What happens if source & name-based routing are both used? • Always require both names?

  3. urn:nena:sos.responder • What happens if accessed from outside ESInet? • Distributed across all ESInets?

  4. Starting point • If a resolver has no cached mappings, should it be allowed to contact a tree node directly?  In other words, should we configure resolvers to start at a non-forest guide node.  Why or why not? • Should be able to start at any location. • Including “local” authoritative server that refers “up”. • May distribute load. • Maybe good second option in case FG is unreachable.

  5. Validation: findServiceResponse • Currently: indicates which elements are good/bad/indifferent • Extensions: • per-element options (Centreville, Centerville, Center Villa) • complete alternatives • How would non-human recipient judge which one is correct? • Large number of permutations • Any experience with auto-correction? • Based on typos? • Changes in municipality names? • Should there be a web interface for humans instead?

More Related