Estimating Cost of Capital

Estimating Cost of Capital P.V. Viswanath

Since financial resources are finite, there is a hurdle that projects have to cross before being deemed acceptable. This hurdle will be higher for riskier projects than for safer projects. A simple representation of the hurdle rate is as follows: Hurdle rate = Return for postponing consumption + Return for bearing risk Hurdle rate = Riskless Rate + Risk Premium The two basic questions that every risk and return model in finance tries to answer are: How do you measure risk? How do you translate this risk measure into a risk premium? The notion of a benchmark P.V. Viswanath

Most finance valuation models use the mean-variance framework – investors prefer higher mean returns and lower variance of portfolio returns. The variance on any investment measures the disparity between actual and expected returns. The Mean-Variance Framework Low Variance Investment High Variance Investment Expected Return P.V. Viswanath

The risk (variance) on any individual investment can be broken down into two sources: firm-specific risk and market-wide risk, which affects all investments. The risk faced by a firm can be fall into the following categories: (1) Project-specific; an individual project may have higher or lower cash flows than expected. (2) Competitive Risk: the earnings and cash flows on a project can be affected by the actions of competitors. (3) Industry-specific Risk: covers factors that primarily impact the earnings and cash flows of a specific industry. (4) International Risk: arising from having some cash flows in currencies other than the one in which the earnings are measured and stock is priced (5) Market risk: reflects the effect on earnings and cash flows of macro economic factors that essentially affect all companies The Importance of Diversification: Risk Types P.V. Viswanath

Firm-specific risk (project specific, competitive and industry-specific) can be reduced, if not eliminated, by increasing the number of investments in your portfolio. International risk can be reduced by holding a globally diversified portfolio. Market-wide risk cannot be avoided. Diversifying and holding a larger portfolio eliminates firm-specific risk for two reasons- (a) Each investment is a much smaller percentage of the portfolio, muting the effect (positive or negative) on the overall portfolio. (b) Firm-specific actions can be either positive or negative. In a large portfolio, it is argued, these effects will average out to zero. (For every firm, where something bad happens, there will be some other firm, where something good happens.) The Effects of Diversification P.V. Viswanath

The marginal investor in a firm is the investor who is most likely to be the buyer or seller on the next trade. Hence this person determines the market value of an asset. Since trading is required, the largest investor may not be the marginal investor, especially if he or she is a founder/manager of the firm (Michael Dell at Dell Computers or Bill Gates at Microsoft) The marginal investor is likely to be well diversified. This makes sense since diversified investors will, all else being the same, be willing to pay a higher price for a given asset, and will drive non-diversified investors out of the market. Hence in valuing a firm, we ignore diversifiable risk. Why diversifiable risk is irrelevant for project selection and firm valuation P.V. Viswanath

Assuming diversification costs nothing (in terms of transactions costs), and that all assets can be traded, the limit of diversification is to hold a portfolio of every single asset in the economy (in proportion to market value). This portfolio is called the market portfolio. Hence the CAPM assumes that the marginal investor holds the market portfolio as the risky part of his/her portfolio. (The overall risk of an investor’s portfolio can be modified by investing a portion of the total investment in the riskless asset. This does not affect diversification.) What does the marginal investor hold? P.V. Viswanath

We already know that the pricing of an asset is determined by the marginal investor Hence the risk premium required for a particular asset is the risk premium demanded by the marginal investor for that asset. And since the marginal investor holds the market portfolio, the risk premium for an average asset, i.e. one that mimics the market, is the required risk premium on the market – the excess of the expected return on the market over the risk-free rate (E(Rm) – Rf). The risk premium for any other asset is proportional to the risk that it adds to the market portfolio, that is, to the variance of the market portfolio. Risk and Risk Premium of an Individual Asset P.V. Viswanath

This asset risk can be measured by how much an asset moves with the market (called the covariance) Beta is a standardized measure of this covariance. An asset’s beta can be measured by the covariance of its returns with returns on a market index, normalized by the variance of returns on the market portfolio:b = Cov(Rasset, Rm)/Var(Rm). The risk premium for an asset with a given asset risk of b is equal to b times the risk premium for a stock of average risk. That is, the required rate of return on an asset will be: Required ROR = Rf + b(E(Rm) - Rf) The Required ROR on an Individual Asset P.V. Viswanath

A portion of portfolio variance can be diversified away, and only the non-diversifiable portion that is rewarded. The non-diversifiable risk is measured by beta, which is standardized around one. The beta is the sensitivity of asset returns to changes in the return on the portfolio held by investors who determine asset prices in the market. The CAPM relates beta to the required rate of return: Reqd. ROR = risk-free rate + b (Risk Premium) The CAPM works as well as the next best alternative in most cases. We now proceed to actual methods of estimation of the cost of capital. The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Summary P.V. Viswanath

According to the CAPM, the required rate of return on an asset will be: Required ROR = Rf + b(E(Rm) - Rf) The inputs required to estimate the required ROR are: (a) the current risk-free rate (b) the expected market risk premium (the premium expected for investing in risky assets over the riskless asset) (c) the beta of the asset being analyzed. Inputs required to use the CAPM P.V. Viswanath

The risk-free rate is the rate on a zero coupon government bond matching the time horizon of the cash flow being analyzed. Theoretically, this means using different risk-free rates for each cash flow - the 1 year zero coupon rate for the cash flow in year 1, the 2-year zero coupon rate for the cash flow in year 2 ... Practically, if there is substantial uncertainty about expected cash flows, it is enough to use a single risk-free rate for all flows. Using a long term government rate (even on a coupon bond) as the risk-free rate on all of the cash flows in a long term analysis will yield a close approximation of the true value. For short term analysis, it is appropriate to use a short term government security rate as the risk-free rate. The Risk-free Rate P.V. Viswanath

The risk premium is the premium that investors demand for investing in an average risk investment, relative to the risk-free rate. As a general proposition, this premium should be greater than zero increase with the risk aversion of the investors in that market increase with the riskiness of the “average” risk investment Measurement of the risk premium P.V. Viswanath

This is the default approach used by most to arrive at the premium to use in the model In most cases, this approach does the following it defines a time period for the estimation (1926-Present, 1962-Present....) it calculates average returns on a stock index during the period it calculates average returns on a riskless security over the period it calculates the difference between the two and uses it as a premium looking forward The limitations of this approach are: it assumes that the risk aversion of investors has not changed in a systematic way across time. (The risk aversion may change from year to year, but it reverts back to historical averages) it assumes that the riskiness of the “risky” portfolio (stock index) has not changed in a systematic way across time. The Historical Premium Approach P.V. Viswanath

Historical Average Premiums for the US In practice, a risk premium of about 5.5% is used. However, depending upon perceptions of investor risk preferences at a given time, this number can be moved upwards or downwards. P.V. Viswanath

The standard procedure for estimating betas is to regress stock returns (Rj) against market returns (Rm) - Rj = a + b Rm where a is the intercept and b is the slope of the regression. Often five years of monthly data is used to estimate these parameters. The slope of the regression corresponds to the beta of the stock, and measures the riskiness of the stock. Estimating Beta P.V. Viswanath

The intercept of the regression provides a simple measure of performance during the period of the regression, relative to the capital asset pricing model. Rj = Rf + bj (Rm - Rf) = Rf (1-bj) + bjRm........... Capital Asset Pricing Model Rj = aj + bjRm........... Regression Equation If aj > Rf (1-bj) ..Stock did better than expected during reg period aj = Rf (1-bj) ..Stock did as well as expected during regr period aj < Rf(1-bj) ..Stock did worse than expected during reg period Jensen's alpha, a measure of stock performance, is measure asaj - Rf (1-b) Estimating Performance P.V. Viswanath

Boeing’s Beta was estimate on December 31, 1998 to be 0.96 risk-free Rate = 5.00% (Long term Government Bond rate) Risk Premium = 5.50% (Approximate historical premium) Expected Return = 5.00% + 0.96 (5.50%) = 10.31% Example: Estimating Expected Returns P.V. Viswanath

Managers at Boeing need to make at least 10.31% as a return for their equity investors to break even. this is the hurdle rate for projects, when the investment is analyzed from an equity standpoint In other words, Boeing’s cost of equity is 10.31%. What is the cost of not delivering this cost of equity? How managers use this expected return P.V. Viswanath

Type of Business: Firms in more cyclical businesses or that sell products that are more discretionary to their customers will have higher betas than firms that are in non-cyclical businesses or sell products that are necessities or staples. Operating Leverage: Firms with greater fixed costs (as a proportion of total costs) will have higher betas than firms will lower fixed costs (as a proportion of total costs) Financial Leverage: Firms that borrow more (higher debt, relative to equity) will have higher equity betas than firms that borrow less. Fundamental Determinants of Betas P.V. Viswanath

Equity Betas and Leverage • If a firm is using leverage to shield income from corporate taxes, then it will adjust its debt level so that its interest expenses grow with earnings. In this case, it is not too far off the mark to assume that the firm’s interest payments stay constant as a proportion of the firm’s free cashflow. • In this case, the riskiness of the tax benefit is the same as the riskiness of the debt itself. • Consequently, we can write the tax benefit simply as tD. If we now think of debt in terms of the net debt liability – i.e. the total debt liability less the tax benefit, we can write the total value of the firm as V=E+(1-t)D. • We can then write: u= (E/V)eq + (D(1-t)/V)debt • If the debt is relatively risk-free, we can write debt=0.

In this case, the beta of equity alone can be written as a function of the unlevered beta and the debt-equity ratio L = u (1+ (1-t)D/E) where L = Levered or Equity Beta u = Unlevered Beta t = Corporate marginal tax rate D = Market Value of Debt E = Market Value of Equity The unlevered beta measures the riskiness of the business that a firm is in and is often called an asset beta. Equity Betas and Leverage P.V. Viswanath

The regression beta for Boeing is 0.96. This beta is a levered beta (because it is based on stock prices, which reflect leverage) and the leverage implicit in the beta estimate is the average market debt equity ratio during the period of the regression (1993 to 1998) The average debt equity ratio during this period was 17.88%. The unlevered beta for Boeing can then be estimated:(using a marginal tax rate of 35%) = Current Beta / (1 + (1 - tax rate) (Average Debt/Equity)) = 0.96 / ( 1 + (1 - 0.35) (0.1788)) = 0.86 Effects of leverage on betas: Boeing P.V. Viswanath

Debt to Debt/Equity Beta EffectCapital Ratio of Leverage 0.00% 0.00% 0.86 0.00 10.00% 11.11% 0.92 0.06 20.00% 25.00% 1.00 0.14 30.00% 42.86% 1.10 0.24 40.00% 66.67% 1.23 0.37 50.00% 100.00% 1.42 0.56 60.00% 150.00% 1.70 0.84 70.00% 233.33% 2.16 1.30 80.00% 400.00% 3.10 2.24 90.00% 900.00% 5.89 5.03 Boeing : Beta and Leverage P.V. Viswanath

The beta of a portfolio is always the market-value weighted average of the betas of the individual investments in that portfolio. Thus, the beta of a mutual fund is the weighted average of the betas of the stocks and other investment in that portfolio the beta of a firm after a merger is the market-value weighted average of the betas of the companies involved in the merger. Betas are weighted Averages P.V. Viswanath

Firm Betas as weighted averages: The beta of a firm is the weighted average of the betas of its individual projects. At a broader level of aggregation, the beta of a firm is the weighted average of the betas of its individual division. Firm Betas versus divisional Betas P.V. Viswanath

The top-down beta for a firm comes from a regression The bottom up beta can be estimated by doing the following: Find out the businesses that a firm operates in Find the unlevered betas of other firms in these businesses Take a weighted (by sales or operating income) average of these unlevered betas Lever up using the firm’s debt/equity ratio The bottom up beta will give you a better estimate of the true beta when the standard error of the beta from the regression is high (and) the beta for a firm is very different from the average for the business the firm has reorganized or restructured itself substantially during the period of the regression when a firm is not traded Bottom-up versus Top-down Beta P.V. Viswanath

The Home Depot’s Comparable Firms P.V. Viswanath

Average Beta of comparable firms = 0.93 D/E ratio of comparable firms = (200+2076)/16,232 = 14.01% Unlevered Beta for comparable firms = 0.93/(1+(1-0.35)(.1401)) = 0.86 If the Home Depot’s D/E ratio is 20%, our bottom-up estimate of Home Depot’s beta is 0.86[1+(1-.35)(.2)] = 0.9718 Estimating The Home Depot’s Bottom-up Beta P.V. Viswanath

The cost of capital is a composite cost to the firm of raising financing to fund its projects. In addition to equity, firms can raise capital from debt. If the firm has bonds outstanding, and the bonds are traded, the yield to maturity on a long-term, straight (no special features) bond can be used as the interest rate. If the firm is rated, use the rating and a typical default spread on bonds with that rating to estimate the cost of debt. If the firm is not rated, and it has recently borrowed long term from a bank, use the interest rate on the borrowing or estimate a synthetic rating for the company, and use the synthetic rating to arrive at a default spread and a cost of debt From Cost of Equity to Cost of Capital P.V. Viswanath

Market Value of Equity should include the following Market Value of Shares outstanding Market Value of Warrants outstanding Market Value of Conversion Option in Convertible Bonds Market Value of Debt is more difficult to estimate because few firms have only publicly traded debt. There are two solutions: Assume book value of debt is equal to market value Estimate the market value of debt from the book value; for Boeing, the book value of debt is $6,972 million, the interest expense on the debt is $ 453 million, the average maturity of the debt is 13.76 years and the pre-tax cost of debt is 5.50%. Estimated MV of Boeing Debt = Estimating Market Value Weights P.V. Viswanath

Equity Cost of Equity = 5% + 1.01 (5.5%) = 10.58% Market Value of Equity = $32.60 Billion Equity/(Debt+Equity ) = 82% Debt After-tax Cost of debt = 5.50% (1-.35) = 3.58% Market Value of Debt = $ 8.2 Billion Debt/(Debt +Equity) = 18% Cost of Capital = 10.58%(.80)+3.58%(.20) = 9.17% Estimating Cost of Capital: Boeing P.V. Viswanath

Either the cost of equity or the cost of capital (WACC) can be used as a hurdle rate, depending upon whether the returns measured are to equity investors or to all claimholders on the firm (capital) If returns are measured to equity investors, the appropriate hurdle rate is the cost of equity. If returns are measured to capital (or the firm), the appropriate hurdle rate is the cost of capital. Choosing a Hurdle Rate P.V. Viswanath

Estimating Cost of Capital