Software Agent -design issues-

1. Software Agent-design issues-

2. Outline Agent review Approaches to building applications Agent & interagent programming tips Incremental system development & evaluation Summary

3. What is an Agent? Voyager, Aglets, Odyssey Mobile Agents Programs that move among computer hosts Autonomous Agents Based on planning technologies Learning Agents User preferences, collaborative filtering,... Animated Interface Agents Avatars, chatbots, ... Simulation-based Entities Data/Info finding, filtering and merging Cooperative Agents Cooperation among distributed heterogeneous programmatic components Robots, Softbots, BDI FireFly, MIT Media Lab Microsoft Agent, Julia ModSAF, RoboCup SIMS, InfoSleuth, IR OAA, KQML, FIPA

4. Approaches to Building Applications Monolithic Applications Object-Oriented Applications Distributed Object Applications Objective Suitable for Internet environment Virtual community of dynamic services Adaptable to changing, evolving network resources Flexible interactions among components Dynamic addition OAA Applications

5. Approaches to Distributed Computing Mobile objects Blackboard architectures Agent communication languages (ACL) Publish & subscribe brokers

6. Mobile Objects (Agents) Interpreter Interpreter • Objects move under their own power (e.g., Voyager, Aglets) • Advantages • Network bandwidth for certain classes of problems • Parallelism - many objects can be spawned • Disadvantages • Programmatically specify where to go and what to do, through a known interface • Little automated support for inter-object cooperation • Programming language specific (non-heterogeneous)

7. Blackboard Architectures tuple(abc,1,2,3) • Knowledge Sources read and write tuples from a common information space (e.g. LINDA, FLiPSiDE) • Advantages • Eliminates explicitly programmed interactions among participants • Disadvantages • KS cannot coordinate interactions • Polling

8. Publish & Subscribe Brokers Broker • Clients register interest, broker routes/filters msgs • Examples: TalarianSmartSockets, Active Software’s ActiveWeb, ACL Brokers • Advantages • Destination process(es) not explicitly encoded • No polling • Disadvantages • Simple filtering, unitary messages

9. Agent Communication Languages Tell Ask ANS, Service Broker Reply • Communication message types based on speech acts (e.g., ask, tell, deny) + conversational policies • Examples: FIPA ACL, KQML • Advantages • Rich interaction model, peer-to-peer based • Standardized message types, content-agnostic • Disadvantages • Conformance to specs not universal • Explicitly coded interactions among participants

10. Comparison of Distributed Approaches

11. Agent & Interagent Programming Tips Choosing an agent Interface Information sharing strategies Domain-specific vs. domain-independent agents Adding speech & NL to interfaces

12. Choosing an Agent Interface • Natural-language inspired interfaces • Imperative Verb, Direct Object, ParamList, (Result) • Parameter lists hold Adjs, Advs & Prepositions as well as extensible programmatic instruction • Classes tagged by type • inform(phone, ringing, Params) • send_message(MsgRef, Params) :- memberchk(by(fax), Params) • Succeed once with list vs. Multiple success • get(email, message_headers, +Params, -ListOfHeaders) • phone_number(Person, PhoneNum)

13. Information Sharing Strategies (1) ? ? ? ? • Example: Phone dialer agent • 1. Query • When an agent wants to know the status of the phone, it asks the Facilitator who asks the phone agent • pa: oaa_Declare(status(phone, S),[]) • ?a: oaa_Solve(status(phone, S), []) • 2. Post (Blackboard) • The phone agent writes its status to the Facilitator; agents can query the facilitator for status, and install a trigger which proactively monitors changes to status • pa: oaa_AddData(status(phone, busy), []) • ia: oaa_Solve(status(phone, S), []),oaa_AddTrigger(data, status(phone,S), notify(Me, phone(S)), [on(change)])

14. Information Sharing Strategies (2) ? ? • 3. Inform • Broadcast time-critical events to interested parties • ia: oaa_Declare(msg(phone, Msg), []) • pa: oaa_Solve(msg(phone, ringing, []), [inform])

15. Domain-specific vs. Domain-independent • Move domain-dependent code into separate agent • Employ hooks and parameters to allow domain-specific tailoring of functionality • Always ask:Domain-specific or domain independent? • Phone agent? • Office interface? • Notify agent? • Speech recognition? • Natural language? • Facilitator?

16. Adding Speech & NL • User Interface responsible for: • accepting user input, sending requests, displaying results • controlling interactions of speech and NL • Complex interpretation processed by external domain agent

17. Incremental System Development & Evaluation Collaborative Multimodal Map application adapted for Wizard Of Oz (WOZ) experiment to elicit data about coordinated use of language and gesture

18. Subject Screen vs. Wizard Screen

19. Hybrid Wizard Of Oz Experiment • Naive user free to write, draw, or speak without constraints imposed by current technology • Wizard must respond quickly and accurately by using existing means, including pen and voice • Simultaneous evaluation of: • Experienced user manipulating real system • New user, providing data for future extensions • Bootstrap effect: continuous loop from data to theory, to system enhancement • Improvements from data analysis quantifiable • General-purpose approach

20. Hybrid WOZ: Implementation System logging and playback “for free” using OAA collaboration facilities “Subject mode”: functional interpretation (mostly) turned off Addition of simple Wizard Feedback panel (separate agent) for text-to-speech messages (e.g., “Function not available.”)

21. Summary • Review of designing issues in software agents • Not good for every application, but good for: • integrating numerous components which need to cooperate, often across language boundaries • supporting media translation • distributed reference resolution • tasking through adaptable or multimodal user interfaces • human/agent collaborative systems & incremental dvpt • exploring direct manipulation/task delegation tradeoffs • Next class (인지구조 ) • 1. Human symbol manipulation within an integrated cognitive architecture, Cognitive Science, 2005. (최봉환) • 2. The importance of cognitive architectures: An analysis based on CLARION, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 2007. (이영설) • 3. A Gentle Introduction to Soar: 2006 update, 2006. (김용준)