1 / 41

Critical Infrastructure Assurance The BC Approach

Critical Infrastructure Assurance The BC Approach. Flood Protection Program. Our Organisation. Response. Long term planning. Two Initiatives – One Presentation. Flood Protection/Legacy. 2010 Security. Start – June 27, 2008 Flood Protection Program Area – The Province

baker-york
Download Presentation

Critical Infrastructure Assurance The BC Approach

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Critical Infrastructure AssuranceThe BC Approach Flood Protection Program

  2. Our Organisation Response Long term planning

  3. Two Initiatives – One Presentation Flood Protection/Legacy 2010 Security Start – June 27, 2008 Flood Protection Program Area – The Province CI Asset Owners in Safety Sector (Dikes) Start – May 1, 2008 2010 ISU Security Resources Area – The Teapot CI Asset Owners in 8 Sectors Data

  4. The Message (Consequence of Loss)

  5. The Quest (for Flood Protection) Legacy • The 10 CI Sectors (per Federal breakdown): • Energy and Utilities • Info and Comm’ns Technology • Finance • Health Care • Food • Water • Transportation • Safety • Government • Manufacturing

  6. Consequence of Loss Criteria The universal connector!

  7. Flood Protection - Which Assets? The Dike or Improvement Project (mandatory) The Assets Protected by the Project (optional)

  8. Typical Dependencies(what does your asset need?) Electricity Primary (assumes no backup) Secondary (the backup) Communications Water Transportation

  9. Effect on Special Event Zones 60 min 5 min 2 Service Areas 1

  10. Asset Identifier (Unique), Name From EMBC (4 letters, unique for agency) Asset Name (descriptive, include function if not obvious) e.g. “Natural Gas Supply Pipe on Knight St Bridge”, instead of “Supply Pipe” BMOT2355N Your agency unique asset identifier For dikes, http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/wsd/public_safety/flood/pdfs_word/dikesauthority.pdf

  11. Consequence of Loss – Dike Project Proposed Dike – Consequence of Loss Original Dike Location, lat, long (-49.012)

  12. Data Flow - Application Application Forms Consequence of Loss Spreadsheet EMBC Victoria Consequence of Loss Ratings EMBC Richmond

  13. Into the Spreadsheet!

  14. If you want to go further…

  15. The Quest (for 2010) Legacy • The 10 CI Sectors (per Federal breakdown): • Energy and Utilities • Info and Comm’ns Technology • Finance • Health Care • Food • Water • Transportation • Safety • Government • Manufacturing Games the 2010 teapot

  16. 2010 Security - GM PLACE/BC PLACE Four new towers New towers Celebration site Casino TBD Costco / four towers TBD New towers

  17. 2010 Security - Olympic Park (Callaghan) Cross Country Biathlon Ski Jumping

  18. V2010-Integrated Security Unit (ISU)Concept of Operations Critical Infrastructure Security Critical infrastructure sectors that are considered to be key to Games Security and function will be reviewed in more detail and where single points of failure are identified these will receive special attention.

  19. 2010 - Which Assets? - The Check List Transportation assets (in the handle) Assets outside the teapot that could directly affect the venue zones All assets (in the pot and the spout) Assets that could damage the venues New and Temporary assets

  20. Granularity • Not too high, not too low • Facility (not equipment)

  21. A Different Approach Show only what you can!

  22. CI Information Sharing

  23. Examples of The Buy In for 2010 BC Hydro Terasen Spectra Chevron Imperial Central Heat Rogers Telus Bell Telesat Ecomm Global Royal Scotia BNP NSCU ING ICBC Province Coastal Fraser Providence CBS Rogers Sugar Choices Cargill Alliance Grain 5,300+ (since May, 2008) Federal Gov’t Provincial Municipal First Nations CRA CBSA DND BCIT VANOC Pacific Coast Versa Cold Hemlock Catalyst Otter Coop Metro Van Vancouver Whistler Burnaby Surrey Richmond CP CN Air Canada Westjet YVR BC Ferries MoT RCMP BCAS Salv. Army Red Cross Coast Guard Safety 33

  24. An Option for Plotting

  25. Why Do This? (CI is Like a Bridge) 15 12 8 20 Minneapolis August 1, 2007 Rush Hour Find the weak links. Fix What’s Critical First!!

  26. Plus #1 - A Tale of Two Bridges 36

  27. Plus #2 - Finding the Weak Link

  28. Moving into Legacy 2010 Data Legacy May, 2008 April, 2010 2010 January, 2009 Legacy Data 38

  29. One Rating – Many Uses Mitigation Response Aligned Business Continuity

  30. Partnering to Success http://www.alpinist.com/media/web08s/everest-2.jpg

  31. Contacts • Allan Galambos – Allan.R.Galambos@gov.bc.ca • Robert Bartlett – Robert.Bartlett@gov.bc.ca • Miranda Myles – Miranda.Myles@gov.bc.ca • The documents: ftp://ftpsry.env.gov.bc.ca/pub/outgoing/fpp/

More Related