430 likes | 564 Views
Outline. Introduction & Logistics Textbook: Russell and Norvig chapters 3, 4 and 5. Notion of a Problem Space Search Techniques Constraint Satisfaction Techniques Game Search; Video: Kasparov vs. Deep Blue. Logistics:. Q. Yang qyang@cs.sfu.ca TA: Janet Hsiao hsiao@cs.sfu.ca Readings
E N D
Outline • Introduction & Logistics • Textbook: Russell and Norvig chapters 3, 4 and 5. • Notion of a Problem Space • Search Techniques • Constraint Satisfaction Techniques • Game Search; Video: Kasparov vs. Deep Blue
Logistics: • Q. Yang qyang@cs.sfu.ca • TA: Janet Hsiao hsiao@cs.sfu.ca • Readings • Required: Textbook by Russell & Norvig and Witten and Eibe • Recommended: various papers • Grading: • Problem Set 10% • Exams 60% • Final Project (Group) 30%
Artificial Intelligence • Planning (To get a good job I should get an MS/CSE…) • Diagnosis(My car won’t start, but I know it has gas…) • Design (Space Shuttle, Boeing 777, Pentium) • Communicate (Language + Social reasoning) • Theorem Proving (Fermat’s Last Theorem) • Perceive/Act(Vision, Manipulation) • Game Playing (Kasparov vs. Deep Blue) • Create Art (MacBeth, Mona Lisa, Taj Mahal) • Learn to ...
AI as Science • Origin & Laws of the Physical Universe • Origin & Laws of Biological Life • Nature of Intelligent Thought AI as Engineering • Softbots & Intelligent User Interfaces • Mobile Robots … Immobots • Machine Learning Algorithms; Data Mining • Medical Expert Systems...
AI Theory • For example, Machine Learning • Given tree structured instance space with n attributes, you need • 4 log(2/d) + 16n log(13/e))/e examples AI Practice • Game Playing • Pattern Classification: Character Recognition, … • Machine Learning: Data Mining, Web Agents • Perception – Vision, Speech
Course Topics by Week • Search (1 and 2-person) & Constraint Satisfaction • KR&R 1: Logic representation & Theorem Proving • KR&R 2: Planning and Diagnosis • Machine Learning 1: Supervised Learning • Machine Learning 2: Unsupervised Learning • Natural Language Processing • Applications • Final Project Demo • Sept 11, 2000
Search (one solution) • Brute force • DFS, BFS, iterative deepening, iterative broadening • Heuristic • Best first, beam, hill climbing, simulated annealing, limited discrepancy • Optimizing • Branch & bound, A*, IDA*, SMA* • Adversary Search • Minimax, alpha-beta, conspiracy search • Constraint Satisfaction • As search, preprocessing, backjumping, forward checking, dynamic variable ordering
Search (Internet and Databases) • Look for all solutions • Must be efficient • Often uses indexing • Also uses heuristics (e.g., Google ) • More than search itself • NLP can be important • Scale up to thousands of users • Caching is often used
Outline • Defining a Search Space • Types of Search • Blind • Heuristic • Optimization • Adversary Search • Constraint Satisfaction • Analysis • Completeness • Time & Space Complexity
Specifying a search problem? • What are states (nodes in graph)? • What are the operators (arcs between nodes)? • Initial state? • Goal test? • [Cost?, Heuristics?, Constraints?] 7 2 3 1 2 3 4 1 6 4 5 6 E.g., Eight Puzzle 8 5 7 8
Towers of Hanoi • What are states (nodes in graph)? • What are the operators (arcs between nodes)? • Initial state? • Goal test? a b c
Water Jug You are given two jugs, a 4-gallon one and a 3-gallon one. Neither has nay measure markers on it. There is a pump that can be used to fill the jugs with water. How can you get exactly 2 gallons of water into the 4-gallon jug?
Planning c a b • What is Search Space? • What are states? • What are arcs? • What is Initial State? • What is Goal? • Path Cost? • Heuristic? PickUp(Block) PutDown(Block) a b c
Missionaries and Cannibals • . • What are states (nodes in graph)? • What are the operators (arcs between nodes)? • Initial state? • Goal test? • 2 Representations m m m c c c
Search Strategies • Blind Search • Depth first search • Breadth first search • Iterative deepening search • Iterative broadening search • Heuristic Search • Optimizing Search • Constraint Satisfaction
General-Search(problem, Queuing-FN) returns a solution, or failurePage 73 of Russell and Norvig • Nodes <- Make-Queue(Make-Node(Initial-State(problem))); • Loop do • If nodes is empty then return failure; • Node <- Remove-Front (nodes); • If Goal-Test(problem) applied to State(node) succeeds then return node; • Nodes = Queuing-Fn(nodes, Expand(node, Operators(problem))); • End Loop
Heuristic Search • A heuristic function is: • Function from a state to a real number • Low number means state is close to goal • High number means state is far from the goal • Every node has a function f(node)! Designing a good heuristic is very important! (And hard) More on this in a bit...
Depth First Search • Maintain stack of nodes to visit ( f(node)= • Nodes = Queuing-Fn(nodes, Expand(node, Operators(problem))); • Evaluation • Complete? • Time Complexity? • Space Complexity? Not for infinite spaces a O(b^d) b c O(d) g h d e f
Breadth First Search • Maintain queue of nodes to visit ( f(node)= • Nodes = Queuing-Fn(nodes, Expand(node, Operators(problem))); • Evaluation • Complete? • Time Complexity? • Space Complexity? Yes a O(b^d) b c O(b^d) g h d e f
Iterative Deepening Search • DFS with limit; incrementally grow limit (page79) a b c
Iterative Deepening Search • DFS with limit; incrementally grow limit • Evaluation • Complete? • Time Complexity? • Space Complexity? Yes a O(b^d) b c O(d) g h d e f
A* Search Underestimates cost of any solution which can reached from node • Idea • Best first search with admissible heuristic • ( f(node)= • Plus keep checking until all possibilities look worse • Evaluation • Finds optimal solution? • Time Complexity? • Space Complexity? Yes O(b^d) O(b^d)
Admissable Heuristics 7 2 3 4 1 6 8 5 • f(x) = g(x) + h(x) • g: cost so far • h: underestimate of remaining costs e 12 8 d a f 10 8 For eight puzzle? 14 20 b 15 c For transportation planning?
A* Optimality • If A* finds a node, then it is a optimal goal node • Proof by contradiction…
Importance of Heuristics 7 2 3 4 1 6 8 5 • h1 = number of tiles in the wrong place • h2 = sum of distances of tiles from correct loc D IDS A*(h1) A*(h2) 2 10 6 6 4 112 13 12 6 680 20 18 8 6384 39 25 10 47127 93 39 12 364404 227 73 14 3473941 539 113 18 3056 363 24 39135 1641
Constraint Satisfaction • Chronological Backtracking (BT) • Backjumping (BJ) • Conflict-Directed Backjumping (CBJ) • Forward checking (FC) • Dynamic variable ordering heuristics • Preprocessing Strategies
Chinese Constraint Network Must be Hot&Sour Soup No Peanuts Chicken Dish Appetizer Total Cost < $30 No Peanuts Pork Dish Vegetable Seafood Rice Not Both Spicy Not Chow Mein
CSPs in the real world • Scheduling Space Shuttle Repair • Transportation Planning • Computer Configuration • Diagnosis
Recognizing Trihedral Objects • Trihedral objects: all vertices are intersections of three planes. • Labeling: with +, - and -> • Enumerating all labels: • Using constraint satisfaction to find correct labels • NP hard in general • CSP gives good solutions
Binary Constraint Network • Set of n variables: x1 … xn • Value domains for each variable: D1 … Dn • Set of binary constraints (also known as relations) • Rij Di Dj • Specifies which values of xi are consistent w/ those of xj • Partial assignment of values with a tuple of pairs • {...(x,a)…} means variable x gets value a... • Consistent if all constraints satisfied on all vars in tuple • Tuple = full solution if consistent & all vars included • Tuple {(xi, ai) … (xj, aj)} consistent w/ a set of vars {xm … xn} iff am … an such that this tuple is consistent: {(xi, ai) … (xj, aj), (xm, am) … (xn, an)} }
N Queens • {(x1, 2), (x2, 4), (x3, 1)} consistent with (x4) • Shorthand: “{2, 4, 1} consistent with x4” • Variables = board columns • Domain values = rows • Rij = {(ai, aj) : (ai aj) (|i-j| |ai-aj|) • e.g. R12 = {(1,3), (1,4), (2,4), (3,1), (4,1), (4,2)} Q Q Q
CSP as a search problem? • What are states (nodes in graph)? • What are the operators (arcs between nodes)? • Initial state? • Goal test? Q Q Q
Chronological Backtracking (BT)(e.g., depth first search) 1 Q Q 2 6 Q Q Q Q Q 4 Consistency check performed in the order in which vars were instantiated If c-check fails, try next value of current var If no more values, backtrack to most recent var Q 3 Q Q 5 Q
Preprocessing Strategies • Even FC-CBJ is O(b^d) time worst case • Sometimes useful to spend polynomial time preprocessing to achieve local consistency before doing exponential search • Arc consistency • Consider all pairs of vars • Can any values be eliminated from a domain ala FC • Propagate • O(d^2) time where d= number of vars
Forward Checking (FC) • Perform Consistency Check Forward • Whenever assign var a value • Prune inconsistent values from • As-yet unvisited variables • Backtrack if domain of any var ever collapses FC only visits consistent nodes but not all such nodes skips (2, 5, 3, 4) which CBJ visits But FC can’t detect that (2, 5, 3) inconsistent with {x5, x6 } Q Q Q Q Q
Dynamic variable ordering • In the N-queens examples we assumed • First x1 then x2 then ... • But this order not required • Any order ok with respect to completeness • A good order leads to huge speedup • A good heuristic: • Choose variable w/ minimum remaining values • This is easy if one is doing FC
Hill Climbing (p112) • Current <- Make-Node(Initial-State(problem)); • Loop Next successor of Current with highest f-value If f(Next) < f(Current), then return Current; Current Next; End loop
Simulated Annealing • Current Make-Node(Initial-State(problem)); • For t =1 to infinity, do • T schedule(t); • If T=0 then return Current; • Next random-selected successor of Current; • E f(Next) - f(Current); • If E>0 then Current Next • Else • Current Next only with probability Note: T decreases with time t; E is the energy function Note: more random moves at beginning, fewer later…
Game Tree Search (java applet) • Two person games: min (adversary) and max (me!) • Max wants to win by expanding all possible moves of min, and looks for the ‘best’ branch • There is a utility function e(n) attached to each terminal node • Values of utility function propagates upward • Max: chooses the max value of all children • Min: chooses the min value of all children • Tic-Tac-Toe • MAX = “X”, MIN = “O” • e (leaf node) = Total-Open-Paths(MAX) – Total-Open-Paths(MIN) • e (leaf node) = +/- infinity for winning nodes • e (MAX node) = MAX {e(succ nodes)}; e(MIN node) = MIN {}
Search Tree Start node MAX 1 X ? -2 X X MIN X X X X X O O O O O 6-5=1 5-5=0 ? -1 0 1 -1
Tricks • Alpha value: for MAX nodes, is a current lower bound on its evaluation function (it never goes down for MAX) • Beta value: for MIN nodes, is a current upper bound on its evaluation function (it never goes up for MIN) • Rule 1: • if MAX is parent, MIN is a child and • (alpha(MAX) > = beta(MIN), • then terminate search on MIN • Rule 2: • if MIN is parent, MAX is a child, and • (alpha(MAX) > = beta(MIN), • Then terminate search on MAX