180 likes | 335 Views
Team Introduction. Michael Ambroise. Time Keeper. Wai-Lam Chan. Project Historian. Allen Lee. Project Analyst. Ovide Mercure. Project Manager. Introduction to Study. Feasibility Determine the feasibility of developing SOGRS vs. Alternate Systems. (ACPEA and WebCT) Project Plan
E N D
Team Introduction Michael Ambroise Time Keeper Wai-Lam Chan Project Historian Allen Lee Project Analyst Ovide Mercure Project Manager
Introduction to Study • Feasibility • Determine the feasibility of developing SOGRS vs. Alternate Systems. (ACPEA and WebCT) • Project Plan • Outline administrative tasks for the development of SOGRS
Feasibility • Problem Statement • Inconveniences of current Excel and e-mail system • Sensitive information cannot be sent via e-mail • Cumbersome and Time Consuming • Problems with WebCT • Difficult to attend due to scheduling conflicts and existing workloads • Alternatives • Automated Cut Paste Email Application (ACPEA) • Student Online Grade Report System (SOGRS) • WebCT
Operational Feasibility • Criteria for Operational Feasibility • Performance – throughput and response time • Information – provides timely and pertinent info • Economy – cost effective services • Control – security and fraud protection • Efficiency – maximum use of resources • Services – reliability, flexibility
Technical Feasibility • Technology – maturity and availability • Expertise – how much is needed?
Economic Feasibility • Cost Analysis of alternative.
Economic • Cost analysis • PM = Duration of Deliverable in Days * (8 hours / 1 Day) * (1 PM / 152 hours) • SC = Effort estimate (PM) * RELY * TIME * STOR * TOOL * LTEX * $15,000 • ACPEA • TPM = 6.16 PM • SC = $89,876.00 • SOGRS • TPM = 9.93 PM • SC = $145,032.00 • WebCT • TPM = 0 PM • SC = $0 RELY – Required System Reliability TIME – Execution Time Constraints STOR – Memory Constraints TOOL – Use of Software Tools LTEX – Language and Tools Experience
Schedule Feasibility • As assessment of how long the solution will take to design and implement
Recommendations • Top Recommendation • Based on our matrix result • WebCT • Second Recommendation • If inconvenience is the top factor • If cost is not a factor • SOGRS
Project Plan Introduction • Hardware and Software • SOGRS Cost Analysis • Project Schedule
H/W & S/W Requirements • Server Computer • Java 1.4.2 • Tomcat 5.0 • Ethernet Connection • Client Computer • Web Browser with JVM (students and professor) • Excel (professor only) • Development • Rational Rose • JCreator • Microsoft Project, Word, and EXCEL
SOGRS Cost Analysis • Deliverable 1: Feasibility Study and Project Plan • PM = 20 * 8 / 152 = 1.1 PM • SC = 1.1 * .91 * 1.07 * 15,000 = $16,066.00 • Deliverable 2: Software Requirements Document • PM = 38 * 8 / 152 = 2 PM • SC = 2 * .91 * 1.07 * 15,000 = $29,211.00 • Deliverable 3: Design Document • PM = 85 * 8 / 152 = 4.4 PM • SC = 4.4 * .91 * 1.07 * 15,000 = $64,264.00 • Deliverable 4: Test Document • PM = 36 * 8 / 152 = 1.9 PM • SC = 1.9 * .91 * 1.07 * 15,000 = $27,750.00 • Deliverable 5: Software Document • PM = 10 * 8 / 152 = .53 PM • SC = .53 * .91 * 1.07 * 15,000 = $7,741.00 • TPM = 9.93 PM • SC = $145,032.00
Work Breakdown • 17 – M4 (Object and Class Structure Done) • 18 – Design Document • 19 – Presentation of Design Document • 20 – Develop Implementation • 21 – M5 • 22 – Test Document Project • 23 – Develop Test Cases • 24 – Testing • 25 – Test Document (TD) • 26 – Presentation of TD • 27 – M6 • 28 – Document Project (SD) • 29 – Software Document (D5) • 30 – Presentation of SD • 31 – M7 • 1 – Document Study • 2 – Prototype User Interfaces • 3 – Research Software Tools • 4 – Feasibility Study and Project Plan Deliverable • 5 – Presentation of Project Plan and Feasibility Study • 6 – M1 • 7 – Document Project (SRD) • 8 – Develop Use Cases • 9 – Expertise with Software Tools • 10 – M2 (Use Case Completion) • 11 – Software Requirement Documents (SRD) • 12 – Presentation of SRD • 13 – M3 • 14 – Document Project (DD) • 15 – Develop Object Sequence Structure • 16 – Develop Class Structure