80 likes | 214 Views
Mount Soledad Cross. Ryan Schramm English 250 Section VC. Overview. History Controversy Opponents & Supporters Mediation. History. Controversy. Government Land Freedom of Religion Establishment Clause. Opponents Position. Violation of Constitution Solutions: Move the Cross
E N D
Mount Soledad Cross Ryan Schramm English 250 Section VC
Overview • History • Controversy • Opponents & Supporters • Mediation
Controversy • Government Land • Freedom of Religion • Establishment Clause
Opponents Position • Violation of Constitution • Solutions: • Move the Cross • Tear Down the Cross • Sell Land to a Third Party
Supporters Position • The Cross Represents San Diego’s History • The Cross has Secular Symbolism • Consequences of Removing the Cross
Mediation • Land be Sold to a Third Party • (Transaction Entails Certain Conditions) • Conditions: • Cross Stays at Current Location • Other Religious Symbols Constructed • New Group Established to Preserve Memorial
Works Cited • "ACLU sues to remove cross from memorial." UPI NewsTrack 25 Aug. 2006. Gale Biography In Context. Web. 4 Nov. 2012. • "Establishment Clause." LII. Cornell University Law School, 19 Aug. 2010. Web. 02 Nov. 2012. • "Judge to San Diego: Move cross or pay fine." UPI NewsTrack 4 May 2006. Gale Biography In Context. Web. 3 Nov. 2012. • Murashko, Alex. "Supporters of Crosses at Veterans Memorials Launch 'Don't Tear Me Down' Campaign." Christian Post. Christian Post United States, 26 May 2012. Web. 04 Nov. 2012. • Steinback, Robert. "The Mount Soledad Controversy." The San Diego Union-Tribune. The San Diego Union-Tribune, 12 May 2006. Web. 04 Nov. 2012. • "War Veterans of the United States v. Rumsfield - Background." American Civil Liberties Union. American Civil Liberties Union, n.d. Web. 04 Nov. 2012.