1.04k likes | 1.37k Views
ADVANCES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF NEPHROLITHIASIS. Glenn M. Preminger, M.D. Comprehensive Kidney Stone Center at Duke University Medical Center Durham, North Carolina. NEPHROLITHIASIS. EPIDEMIOLOGY. Affects 1 - 3 % of adult population Annual incidence 1% in white males
E N D
ADVANCES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF NEPHROLITHIASIS Glenn M. Preminger, M.D. • Comprehensive Kidney Stone Center • at Duke University Medical Center • Durham, North Carolina
NEPHROLITHIASIS EPIDEMIOLOGY • Affects 1 - 3 % of adult population • Annual incidence 1% in white males • Life - time risk in adult males - 20% • Recurrent stones in 63% after 8 years
NEPHROLITHIASIS ANATOMY
NEPHROLITHIASIS NATURAL HISTORY & RISK FACTORS Peak incidence age 30 - 60 Gender (Male : Female) 3 : 1 Family history 3 - fold risk Body size risk with weight Recurrence after first stone: Year 1 10 - 15% Year 5 50 - 60% Year 10 70 - 80%
NEPHROLITHIASIS ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS - 1993 DATA • Inpatient • Evaluation $155 million • Hospitalization $848 million • Professional $762 million • Wages $140 million • Outpatient • Evaluation $358 million • Wages $128 million • Total $2.39 Billion Thompson, et al, 1995
ASYMPTOMATIC CALCULI TREATMENT • Solitary kidney • Occupation (pilot, business traveler • Simultaneous contralateral treatment • It’s difficult to make an asymptomatic patient feel any better !
SURGICAL STONE DEFINITION • Intractable pain • Significant obstruction • Recurrent infection • Severe bleeding • Imminent threat
STONE MANAGEMENT OPTIONS • Open surgery • Percutaneous nephrolithotomy • Ureteroscopy • Shock wave lithotripsy • Medical therapy
STONE MANAGEMENT OPEN NEPHROLITHOTOMY
SURGICAL STONE MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS • Residual stone rate • Recurrence rate • Number of procedures • Hospitalization • Convalescence • Cost
SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY HISTORY • 1972 - 1980 Preliminary research • Feb, 1980 First human treated • May, 1984 Clinical trials begin in USA • Dec, 1984 FDA approval (Dornier)
SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY ORIGINAL DORNIER HM3
SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY SECOND GENERATION MACHINES
SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY STONE FRAGMENTATION
SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY STONE FRAGMENTATION
SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY INDICATIONS • Surgical stone • No obstruction • Reasonable chanceof expeditious removal
SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY RELATIVE CONTAINDICATIONS • Large stones Calcium oxalate > 20 mm Struvite > 30 mm • Cystine stones • Distal obstruction • Poorly informed patients
SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY CLINICAL SIDE-EFFECTS • Hematuria • Pain • Obstruction (Steinstrasse)
SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY CLINICAL RENAL INJURY • Mild contusion - Large hematoma • Renal injury in 63 - 85% by MRI • Little data on chronic injury • Hypertension probably not a problem
SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY APPROPRIATE FOLLOW-UP • Plain radiographs (KUB + tomograms) • Renal scan • Intravenous pyelogram • Spiral CT
SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY REALITY • <15mm15-29mm>30mm • Multiple SWL 5% 10% 15-30% • Stone-free rate >80% 60% 50% • Auxiliary procedures 2% 5-7% 15% • Repeat procedures 1-2% 10-15% 15-20%
SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY REALITY • Ideal for some • Marginal in some • Contraindicated in few • THE KEY IS PROPER PATIENTSELECTION AND EDUCATION
SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY IDEAL CANDIDATES • Small stone (< 1.5 cm) • Mid or upper pole location • Normal renal anatomy • No distal obstruction
SURGICAL STONE MANAGEMENT Stone size Stone location Stone composition MODIFIERS OF STONE-FREE RATE
SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY Completeness of stone fragmentation Completeness of fragment elimination LIMITATIONS
SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY STONE FREE RATES % Stone Free Lingeman and Newman, 1990
STONE MANAGEMENT PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY
STONE MANAGEMENT PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY
STONE MANAGEMENT Large stone mass Obstruction Anatomic abnormality SWL failure Horseshoe, divertic Certainty of results Cystine stones Obesity PNL IN THE AGE OF SWL
SURGICAL STONE MANAGEMENT Stone volume 46% Obstruction 16% Cystine stones 16% Body habitus 12% SWL failures 10% CURRENT ROLE OFPERCUTANEOUS STONE REMOVAL
SURGICAL STONE MANAGEMENT CURRENT ROLE OF PNL
SURGICAL STONE MANAGEMENT CURRENT ROLE OFPERCUTANEOUS STONE REMOVAL Pre-op KUB Post-SWL KUB
SURGICAL STONE MANAGEMENT CURRENT ROLE OFPERCUTANEOUS STONE REMOVAL Post-PNL KUB Post-PNL IVP
SURGICAL STONE MANAGEMENT STAY OUT OF TROUBLE Pre-op KUB Pre-op IVP
SURGICAL STONE MANAGEMENT STAY OUT OF TROUBLE Post-op tomogram Post-op IVP
STAGHORN CALCULI CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION Stone-free rates Primary procedures Secondary procedures Unexplained secondary procedures Hospital days AUA Guidelines Panel, 1994
STAGHORN CALCULI STONE FREE RATE % Stone Free AUA Guidelines Panel, 1994
STAGHORN CALCULI PROCEDURES PER PATIENT (20) % 20 Procedures AUA Guidelines Panel, 1994
STAGHORN CALCULI SANDWICH THERAPY PNL SWL FLEX NEPHROCOPY
STAGHORN CALCULI Allows debulking of large stones (Should push PNL "to the limit") SWL reserved for inaccessible fragments Flexible nephroscopy to insure stone-free status SANDWICH THERAPY
STAGHORN CALCULI SANDWICH THERAPY
STAGHORN CALCULI AGGRESSIVE PNL - SINGLE PROCEDURE Pre-op KUB Pre-op KUB
STAGHORN CALCULI AGGRESSIVE PNL - SINGLE PROCEDURE Pre-op IVP Pre-op IVP
STAGHORN CALCULI AGGRESSIVE PNL - SINGLE PROCEDURE 3 N-tracts Upper pole access
STAGHORN CALCULI AGGRESSIVE PNL - SINGLE PROCEDURE 3 access sheaths Post-op N-tubes
URETERAL CALCULI TREATMENT CONSIDERATIONS Location Size Chronicity Equipment Expertise
URETERAL CALCULI TREATMENT OPTIONS Observation Shock wave lithotripsy Ureteroscopy Blind basket extraction Percutaneous approach Open surgery
URETERAL CALCULI SPONTANEOUS PASSAGE