1 / 40

Metalinguistics

Metalinguistics. Prof A. Elhaloui. What’s language?. Language is a procedure by which sounds are matched to meanings. Metalinguistics is that scientific discipline that tries to characterize this relationship. Why do we need metalinguistics?.

barr
Download Presentation

Metalinguistics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Metalinguistics Prof A. Elhaloui

  2. What’s language? • Language is a procedure by which sounds are matched to meanings. • Metalinguistics is that scientific discipline that tries to characterize this relationship.

  3. Why do we need metalinguistics? • Metalinguistics will organize the relationships among the different levels linguistic analysis. How?

  4. Analysis Level Paradox • Some levels of linguistic analysis seem to be theoretically ”parallel” even if they belong to different scientific disciplines. • Some levels of linguistic analysis seem to be theoretically ”different” even if they belong to the same scientific discipline.

  5. A graphic representation of the ALP Scientific discipline A 1’ 2’ Scientific discipline B 1 2

  6. Example Consider the study of Speech Acts inferences and the study of word connotation:

  7. What are SA inferences? • SA inferences mean: The inferences that allow us to understand the indirect SA from direct INSA. • Example: promise ------ statement about the future.

  8. What’s word connotation? • Word connotaion means: What we understand from words beyond their direct meaning such as the metaphorical meaning. • Example: His words were cold like winter.

  9. Example Consider the study of SA inferences and the study of word connotation: • Both assume that there is an output from which something which is not explicit is understood. • Both study aspects of meaning which are beyond the direct meaning. • Both consider the possibility of there being multi-layered aspects of meaning.

  10. Output • The output in the case of word meaning is the word. • The input in the case of utterance meaning is the utterance.

  11. Beyond direct meaning • In the case of word meaning, we go beyond direct meaning to metaphorical meaning. • In the case of utterance meaning we go beyond the direct speech act to infer an indirect speech act.

  12. /layən/

  13. Connotation /layən/ (lion) courageous

  14. Indirect speech act 1 Can you pass me the salt? Pass me the salt!

  15. Multi-layered aspects of meaning • In the case of word meaning we can go even beyond the metaphorical meaning to a second and third layer of meaning (irony, for example). • In the case of utterance meaning we can go beyond the indirect meaning to a second and a thid layer of indirect meanings (indirect speech acts).

  16. Banter /layən/ (lion) courageous (lion) coward

  17. Indirect speech act 2 Can you pass me the salt? Pass me the salt! Pass me the salt, otherwise ...

  18. Case One • Consider the study of speech acts and the study of word meaning. • For both the form in which meaning is expressed is irrelevant: Irrelevance of Form • Both define meaning in conceptual/intentional (psychological) terms: Relevance of Substance • For both, the indirect meaning is not a part of the aspect of meaning that is to be studied: Directness of meaning

  19. Irrelevance of Form/Relevance of Substance • Consider the way we define a word in semantics: • Man: +human, +male, +adult, ... • This analysis of meaning does not make any assumptions about how (+human, +male, +adult, ...) is expressed out. • The aspect of the word MAN we analyse is NOTexpressive: we do not consider the way in which MAN is expressed out.

  20. Irrelevance of Form • Consider the way we define a speech act: • PC: about a fut act, PP: H can do A, SC: S wants A to be done, EC: attempt to get S do A. • This analysis does not make any assumptions about how REQUEST is performed. • The aspect of REQUEST that we are analyzing is NOTexpressive: we do not consider the way in which REQUEST is expressed out.

  21. Directness of meaning • When we define meaning (e.g., of word or a speech act), without specifying the form in which this meaning is defined, ONLY the direct meaning can be analyzed. • Indirect meaning is activated ONLY when direct meaning is expressed out.

  22. Examples • Connotation is possible ONLY when we have a word. • Inference of indirect speech act is possible ONLY when we have an utterance having a direct speech act. • Inference of how face is anointed and why is possible ONLY when we have an utterance with a direct meaning.

  23. Indirectness in SAs Must be expressed in a form Direct SA Indirect SA1 Indirect SA2

  24. Indirectness in Word meaning Must be expressed in a form Word: lion Metaphor: brave Banter: coward

  25. Indirectness in politeness strategies Must be expressed in a form Direct SA: ”How are you?” PPS: ”I like you” You needn’t get scared when I am with you

  26. A graphic representation of the ALP Pragmatics SA inferences analysis SA meaning analysis Semantics Word Connotation analysis Word Meaning analysis

  27. How can we Explain the ALP? • Sound-Meaning relationship is a DIRECTIONAL relationship What’s a DIRECTIONAL relationship?

  28. Directional Relationship: x and y are objects from the natural world (V) • If x exists at a time t then y also exists at the time t • xRy has an output O • xRy can hold between Oand x/y

  29. Direct Relat. x y Output Direct Relat Direct Relat

  30. Example 1 Etc.

  31. layən

  32. Sound – Meaning Relation /layən/ (lion) courageous (lion) coward

  33. So ... • Why do we have two levels of meaning analysis: one where the analysis of meaning is: • In terms of direct meaning • Where no reference to output is made • and where meaning is not multilayered • And one where meaning is: • indirect, • where reference to output is made, • and where meaning is multilayered?

  34. Since sound-meaning relationship is directional: • It has an output • It is transitive

  35. Two possible ways of studying S/M relationship • We can study meaning and sound before the matching of the relationship between them and after the relationship between them. • Before: what’s sound? What’s meaning. • After: how is sound associated with meaning?

  36. Before/after • Before: meaning is defined regardless of the sound related to it. No output of the relationship id taken into consideration. • After: meaning is defined in terms of the relationship established between sound and meaning. The output is assumed.

  37. SO ... • We expect to find two analysis levels: • At one level, the S/M relationship (which is directional) subsists • At another, the S/M relationship (which directional) does NOT subsist.

  38. The two possibilities • If S/M subsists, we expect to find an output and transitivity effect. • If S/M does NOT subsist, no output and no transitivity effect are expected.

  39. S/M does not subsist • Level one where S/M does not subsist is the level where word meaning and SA meaning are defined: no reference to output, no indirectness and no multilayered meanings because: • No output is activated • No transitivity effect is activated

  40. S/M subsists • Level two where S/M subsists is the level where word connotation and ISA are defined: reference to output is obligatory, indirectness of meaning is activated and multilayered meanings are motivated because: • Output is activated • Transitivity effect is activated

More Related