310 likes | 469 Views
Security Engineering for Software. Dimitry Averin CS996 – Information Security Management March 30, 2005. Definitions.
E N D
Security Engineering for Software Dimitry Averin CS996 – Information Security Management March 30, 2005
Definitions • Software Engineering: Concept of creating and maintaining software applications by applying technologies and practices from computer science and project management fields [www.wikipedia.org] • Secure Software Engineering
DESIGN IMPLEMENTATION TESTING DEPLOYMENT MAINTENANCE “Current”/Traditional Software Engineering • Over 30 years of software development experience created a well defined application software development lifecycle REQUIREMENTS • There are many software development methodologies (ex. XP, waterfall, etc) they all have these basic steps • Capability Maturity Model for Software (SW-CMM), is used to measure quality of methodologies employed
Motivation • This application development process in its essence fails to address security issues • Consequently, security flaws are identified only at the later stages of the application lifecycle. And thus • Much greater cost to fix • High maintenance cost • … • Nearly every company/organization utilizes network security infrastructure (e.g. Firewalls, IDS, etc) • But very small number of them invest in application security strategy, design, and code review services
So • For the software industry, the key to meeting demand for improved security, is to implement repeatable processes that reliably deliver measurably improved security • Thus, there must be a transition to a more stringent software development process that greatly focuses on security • Goal: minimize the number of security vulnerabilities in design, implementation, and documentation • Identify and remove vulnerabilities in the development lifecycle as early as possible!!!
Building Secure Software Three essential components • Repeatable process • Engineer Education • Metrics and Accountability • SDL – Secure Development Lifecycle • Used along with traditional/current software development lifecycle/techniques in order to introduce security at every stage of software development
SDL – Requirements Phase Requirements Design Implementation Verification Deployment Maintenance • Development of requirements • Gather information about application [costumer/experience/survey] • Analysis of requirements • Are all the security issues addressed • CIA – [Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability] • Verification of requirements • Are there are any inconsistencies / system interface / correctness • Documentation!!! • Feasibility of requirements • [repeat] • The bottom line: Planning at this stage offers the best opportunity to build secure software in the most efficient manner [cost, time, etc]
SDL – Requirements Phase Requirements Design Implementation Verification Deployment Maintenance • Develop Security Requirements • Security Requirements of a system/application must be developed along with any other requirements requirements (e.g. functional, legal, user, etc) • Risk analysis • Identify all the assets at risk • Identify all the threats • Develop security policies • Used as guidelines for requirements • Develop security metrics
SDL – Design Phase Requirements Design Implementation Verification Deployment Maintenance • At this stage all design decisions are made, about • Software Architecture • Software components • Programming languages • Interfaces • … • Develop documentation • Confirm that all requirements are followed and met
SDL – Design Phase Requirements Design Implementation Verification Deployment Maintenance • Treat Models • Input Data Types • Security Use Cases • Security Architecture • Defense in Layers / Separate Components / Least Privilege • Tool • SecureUML – Secure Unified Modeling Language SecureUML - example
SDL – Implementation Phase Requirements Design Implementation Verification Deployment Maintenance • This is the stage where coding is done. • To produce secure software • Coding Standards • Centralized Security Modules • Secure builds and configurations • Known security vulnerabilities - use good programming practices. Be aware of • Race conditions • Buffer overflow • Format string • Malicious logic • … • Follow Design & Develop Documentation [further]
Design and implementation of security features. From the Requirements Robust Programming Practices Good design and coding practices SDL – Implementation Phase Requirements Design Implementation Verification Deployment Maintenance “Vulnerability-free” Application
SDL – Verification Phase Requirements Design Implementation Verification Deployment Maintenance • Testing of the code developed in the previous stage • Cleared security tests • Security vulnerability tracking • Code Reviews • Documentation
SDL – Release Phase Requirements Design Implementation Verification Deployment Maintenance • Secure Management Procedures • Monitoring Requirements • Security Upgrade Procedures
SDL – Response Phase Requirements Design Implementation Verification Deployment Maintenance • Causes: • Costumer feedback • Security incident details and vulnerability reports • … • Types of maintenance • Need to introduce new functionality • Need to upgrade to keep up with technology • Discovered vulnerability
Facts: • Every security vulnerability / flaw overlooked in an earlier phase will end-up at later phase[s] • Resulting into greater • Cost • Time of the software development and/or maintenance
Microsoft – Case Study SD3 + C • Secure by Design • Software designed and implemented to “protect” itself and its information • Secure by Default • Accept the fact that software will not achiever perfect security • To minimize the harm when vulnerabilities exploited, software’s default state should promote security (ex. least necessary privileges) • Secure in Deployment • Software accompanied by tools and guidance to assist secure use • Communications • Developers should be prepared for discovery of product vulnerabilities and should communicate openly and responsibly with end users. (e.g. patching, deploying workarounds)
Inception • Security Advisor • assigned • Ensure security • milestones are • understood • - Identify security • requirements • Guidelines & Best • Practices • Coding and test • standards • Test plans developed • and executed • - Tools used • Final Security Review • Threat models reviewed • Unfixed bugs reviewed • New bugs reviewed • Penetration testing • completed • - Documentation achieved • Design & Threat Modeling • Design guidelines documented • Threat models produced • Security architecture documented • Threat model and design review • completed • Security Push • Threat models • reviewed • Code reviewed • Attack testing • New threats evaluated • Security testing • completed • Security Response • Feedback • Tools/processes • evaluated • Postmortems • completed SDL @ Microsoft Requirements Design Implementation Verification Release Response
SDL – Requirements Phase @ Microsoft Requirements Design Implementation Verification Release Response • Product and central security teams assign “security buddy” – security advisor • Point of contact / resources / guide • Review plans / recommendations / resources • Product team considers • How security will be integrated into the development process • Key security objectives • Documentation
SDL – Design Phase @ Microsoft Requirements Design Implementation Verification Release Response • Define security architecture and design guidelines • Document the elements of the software attack surface • Conduct threat modeling • Define supplemental ship criteria
SDL – Implementation Phase @ Microsoft Requirements Design Implementation Verification Release Response • Apply coding and testing standards • Apply fuzzing tools • Supplies structured but invalid inputs • Apply static-analysis code scanning tools • Conduct code reviews
SDL – Verification Phase @ Microsoft Requirements Design Implementation Verification Release Response • “Beta” testing stage • “Security push” • security code reviews beyond ones completed in implementation phase • Testing of high priority code • Trying to “break” the code
SDL – Release Phase @ Microsoft Requirements Design Implementation Verification Release Response • During the release, software is subject to Final Security Review [FSR] • The goal of FSR is to determine whether, from security viewpoint, the software is ready to be delivered to costumers • Not pass / fail • Goal is to find every remaining security vulnerability in software • If found, revisit all the preceding phases and fix the root problem • Conducted by central security team
SDL – Response Phase @ Microsoft Requirements Design Implementation Verification Release Response • Despite use of SDL, resulting software is not vulnerability free; and even if it could be so, new attacks would be possible • Evaluation of reports • Development of patches and security updates
SDL @ Microsoft • Mandatory Application of the SDL • Mandatory Education • Metrics for Product Teams • The Central Security Team
Mobile Malicious Code • Malicious code: • Code is that which is intentionally included in hardware, software, firmware or data for unauthorized purposes. Computer Viruses, Worms, Trojan Horses, Trapdoors, and Logic/Time Bombs all fall under the definition of malicious code. • Mobile code: • Technology which allows for the creation of executable information which can be delivered to an information system and then directly executed on any hardware/software architecture which has an appropriate host execution environment.
Mobile Malicious Code [cont’d] • Malicious Mobile Code: • Mobile code is the software designed, employed, distributed, or activated with the intention of compromising the performance or security of information systems and computers, increasing access to those systems, providing the unauthorized disclosure of information, corrupting information, denying service, or stealing resources. • Types of mobile code are direct and indirect: • Direct mobile code can be recognized within the primary transport mechanism, such as a virus within a file. • Indirect mobile code may be embedded, such as inside of an attachment to an E-Mail.
Mobile Code Technologies • Category 1 • Mobile code that can exhibit broad functionality using unmediated access to services and resources of workstations, hosts and remote systems. [e.g. Active X, VBA, Unix shell script] • Category 2 • Mobile code that has full functionality using mediated or controlled access to services and resources of workstations, hosts and remote systems. [e.g. Java Applets, Postscript] • Category 3 • Mobile code that has limited functionality, with no capability for unmediated or uncontrolled access to services and resources of workstations, hosts and remote systems. [e.g. JavaScript, VB script] • Exempt technologies are those which are not considered true mobile code • [e.g. XML, Web server scripts]
Trusted Source • A trusted source is a source that is adjudged to provide reliable software code or information and whose identity can be verified by authentication. [e.g. Joint Worldwide Intelligence Communications System [JWICS ]] • Screening • Preventive measure to monitor processes and data to intercept malicious code before it is introduced to an IS. Screening also includes monitoring IS for the presence of malicious code which is already present. Malicious code occurs in different forms, which may have different methods for screening.