1 / 11

Scientific Social Responsibility

Scientific Social Responsibility. Maja Horst Copenhagen Business School mho.ioa@cbs.dk. Introducing social and ethical concerns in nanotechnological developments. 2003: US Congress : 21st Century Nanotechnology Research and Development Act

bary
Download Presentation

Scientific Social Responsibility

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Scientific Social Responsibility Maja Horst Copenhagen Business School mho.ioa@cbs.dk

  2. Introducing social and ethicalconcerns in nanotechnologicaldevelopments • 2003: US Congress: 21st Century Nanotechnology Research and DevelopmentAct • ‘that ethical, legal, environmental, and other appropriate societal concerns … are considered during the development of nanotechnology’ • 2004: UK Royal Society/Royal Academy of Engineering: Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertainties • ‘A number of the social and ethical issues that might be generated by developments in nanoscience and nanotechnologies should be investigated further’ • ‘We believe that a constructive and proactive debate [Public Dialogue] about the future of nanotechnologies should be undertaken now – at a stage when it can inform key decisions about their development and before deeply entrenched or polarised positions appear’

  3. Importantlessons (1)Loosingcredibility by insistingon ’norisk’ ‘Eating British beef is completely safe. There is no evidence of any threat to human health caused by this animal health problem (BSE:Mad Cow Disease)… This is the view of independent British and European scientists and not just the meat industry.. This view has been endorsed by the Department of Health.’ (The Times, May 18, 1990)

  4. Importantlessons (2)Resistance as ’innovation stopper’

  5. Solving controversies over scientific innovation (1) • Traditional model of one-way communication • Controversies are signs of lack of knowledge • As people are educated, they will stop being critical • Controversies will cease when knowledge is effectively diffused in society Model of Diffusion Science Society

  6. Solving controversies of scientific innovation (2) • Controversiesaresigns of science gonewrong • As science comes under control of democracy, it willbecomelegitimate and controversieswillcease Model of Diffusion Model of Democracy Science Science Truth Legitimacy Society Society

  7. Solving controversies over scientific innovation (3) Model of Diffusion Model of Negotiation Model of Democracy Science Science Science Truth Legitimacy Credibility Society Society Society

  8. Creating credibility and social acceptability through negotiation • Science’s monopoly on expertise has been seriously challenged • Definition of expertise is contextual and has to be earned • New forms of expertise have to be integrated in innovation processes • In addition to being true, scientific knowledge also has to be socially robust if it is to result in stable innovations • Social acceptability is shaped in processes of negotiation • Early involvement of stakeholders will improve the quality of innovation

  9. From Research Ethics to Social Responsibility • Research Ethics (more narrow) • Informedconsent • Publicationethics to preventfraud and misconduct • Scientific Social Responsibility (more broad) • To be accountable to social and ethical values in society • Possible areas for concern • Return on investment • Contributions to a better society through use of knowledge (output focus) • Considerations of dual use • Adherence to cultural or religious norms • Defining research problems based on societal problems, e.g. climate change, pollution, diseases (input focus) • Road block or exciting possibility to learn something unexpected?

  10. Science in Society Politicaldecision-making Scientificknowledgeproduction Public opinion formation Marketexchange

  11. Groups of five (of yourownchoice) sit at a table Until 6pm discussamongyourselves How is your Research projectgrounded in Society?

More Related