400 likes | 715 Views
Speciation. The actual “origin of species” Reduction in gene flow, genetic and phenotypic change in populations The study of speciation requires that species be real. Speciation. Speciation is the antidote to sex Keeps together adaptive groups of traits New species most often uniparental
E N D
Speciation • The actual “origin of species” • Reduction in gene flow, genetic and phenotypic change in populations • The study of speciation requires that species be real
Speciation • Speciation is the antidote to sex • Keeps together adaptive groups of traits • New species most often uniparental • Phylogeny is genealogy of species • Branching tree
Hybridization • Mules • Fertile interspecific hybrids are common in perennial plants
Hybrid speciation • New species form from interspecific hybrids • Two parents • Phylogenetic pattern is reticulate • Enough examples to make it interesting • Not enough to disrupt the generally divergent pattern of phylogeny
Alloploidy • Chromosome doubling (unreduced gametes or somatic doubling) • Alloploid effectively has one diploid set from each parent species • Instant Speciation™
Homoploid hybrid speciation • No chromosome doubling • Two theoretical modes, both documented • Recombinational speciation • Speciation with external barriers
Recombinational speciation • F1s of reduced fertility, chromosome differences • F2s more fertile than backcrosses • Fertility restored in new species by recombination of chromosome segments
Speciation with external barriers • F1s not of reduced fertility • Few or no chromosomal differences between parents • Formation of backcrosses reduced by external barriers
So what’s an Encelia? • Asteraceae (sunflower family) • Mostly shrubs • Dry habitats, mostly deserts • Brittlebush (E. farinosa)
A hybrid under every bush • “The bushes are hybrids” • All species are interfertile • No apparent reduction of fertility in F1, F2, backcross • Is it a syngameon?
Spontaneous natural hybrids • E. farinosa× E. frutescens • E. farinosa× E. californica • E. farinosa× E. palmeri • E. farinosa× E. halimifolia • E. californica× E. asperifolia • E. ventorum× E. palmeri • E. ventorum× E. asperifolia • E. virginensis× E. frutescens • E. actoni× E. frutescens
Encelia×laciniata • Named as a species • Hybrids between E. ventorum and E. palmeri • Selection against recombinants
Phylogeny: always a good place to start • The days of cladistics before DNA • Two well-defined clades (californica clade and frutescens clade) • Relationships within clades less clear
Not just morphology—phenotype • Standard morphology of heads, capitulescences, leaves • Micromorphology, especially trichomes • Secondary chemistry • Ultraviolet floral patterns • Anatomy of stems and leaves (petioles turned out to be useful) • More that I’ve probably forgotten
DNA sequence analysis • ITS (internal transcribed spacer of ribosomal DNA) • DNA doesn’t work so well for closely related species • Hybridization is more likely to be confusing in DNA sequence analysis than in morphological analysis
Identifying species of hybrid origin • Species of hybrid origin not always intermediate between parents • Species of intermediate morphology not always of hybrid origin
Preponderance of evidence • Intermediate morphology • Agreement with F1s • Apomorphies shared with parents
Species of hybrid origin E. virginensis(parents: E. actoni and E. frutescenssubsp.frutescens) E. asperifolia(parents: E. californica and E. frutescenssubsp. glandulosa)
E. virginensis E. actoni E. frutescens
Shared phenotypic apomorphies – E. virginensis • With E. frutescens • broad multicellular-based hairs • With E. actoni • none(E. actoni has no clear autapomorphies, but E. virginensis resembles it morphologically)
length of petiole • width of leaf • height of head • width of head • pedicel width • number of rays • length of ray • length of leaf
E. californica E. frutescens subsp. glandulosa E. asperifolia
Shared phenotypic apomorphies– E. asperifolia • With E. frutescens • broad multicellular-based hairs • no benzopyrans or benzofurans • yellow stigmas • With E. californica • UV-reflective ray corollas • brown disk corollas • moniliform hairs
RAPD data: E. asperifolia • Shared with E. californica • UBC 218 (0.8 kbase,1.6 kbase) • UBC 382 (1.4 kbase) • UBC 409 (0.5 kbase) • UBC 478 (1.4 kbase) • Operon B8 (0.75 kbase) • Shared with E. frutescens • UBC 149 (0.7 kbase) • UBC 375 (1.0 kbase)
Hybrid speciation by external barriers • E. ×laciniataprovides a model
Conclusion • I’m done • What are the traits that adapt the new species to their new habitats? • Are there transgressive traits? • Plenty of other plant genera
Acknowledgments Allan, Gery J. Axelrod, Daniel Braden, Gerald Bryant, Stephen Budzikiewicz, Herbert Carpenter, Kevin J. Charest, Nancy A. Clark, Emily Ehleringer, James R. Harrington, Daniel F. Isman, Murray B. Kinney, Michael Koukol, Scott R. Kyhos, Donald W. Lahmeyer, Sean C. Laufenberg, Gabriela Lee, Gregory J. Maepo, Linda Miller, David Nishida, Joy H. Panero, José Parra, Mima Patterson, Mark Politt, Ursula Proksch, Peter Rieseberg, Loren Rodriguez, Eloy Saccoman, Stephanie Sanders, Donald L. Schilling, Edward Thompson, William C. Weiler, Jeff Weisman, Kathy Wisdom, Charles Wollenweber, Eckhard Wray, Victor