1 / 20

HI-RES GRIDDED MOS 6-H QPF GUIDANCE

HI-RES GRIDDED MOS 6-H QPF GUIDANCE. JESS CHARBA FRED SAMPLATSKY METEOROLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT LABORATORY OST / NWS / NOAA. Details = http://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/154176.pdf. OUTLINE. QPF PRODUCTS STATISTICAL MODEL CASE STUDIES QPF COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE

basil-black
Download Presentation

HI-RES GRIDDED MOS 6-H QPF GUIDANCE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. HI-RES GRIDDED MOS 6-H QPF GUIDANCE JESS CHARBA FRED SAMPLATSKY METEOROLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT LABORATORY OST / NWS / NOAA Details =http://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/154176.pdf

  2. OUTLINE QPF PRODUCTS STATISTICAL MODEL CASE STUDIES QPF COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE STATUS AND IMPLEMENTATION PLANS CONCLUSIONS

  3. QPF PRODUCTS 6- & 12-H QPFS TO 156 HRS / POP TO 192 HRS PROBABILITY FOR EIGHT 6-H PRECIP CATEGORIES (≥ 0.01 ” - ≥ 2.00 ”) EXPECTED 6-H PRECIP AMT CATEGORICAL 6-H PRECIP AMT CONTINUOUS 6- &12-H PRECIP AMT (6-H MAX = 4.7 ”) ISSUED TWICE PER DAY USE RFC STAGE III PRECIP ESTS. (QC’D AT MDL) 4-KM (NATIVE) GRID CONUS COVERAGE

  4. STATISTICAL MODEL REGIONALIZED REGRESSION EQUATIONS FOR 4-KM GRID MULTIPLE PREDICTOR INPUTS REGIONS

  5. PREDICTOR INPUTS GFS MODEL OUTPUT HI-RES PRECIP CLIMATOLOGIES AND TOPOGRAPGY SPECIAL “INTERACTIVE” PREDICTORS INJECT HI-RES TOPO-CLIMATE INPUT INTO QPFS

  6. 2 4 7 10 12 13 3 9 1 5 6 8 11 DISCRETE AND OVERLAPPING REGIONS

  7. DISCRETE REGIONS OVERLAPPING REGIONS & QPF WEIGHTING 36-H PROB (%) ≥ 0.10 ” 6-H PERIOD ENDING 00Z 30 JAN 2008

  8. FORECAST PERFORMANCE 6-H QPF CASE STUDIES FROM 2008 (INDEP)

  9. OBS PRECIP (”) FCST PRECIP (”) 12 H 84 H 6-H PERIOD ENDING 00Z 05 JAN 2008

  10. OBS PRECIP (”) FCST PROB (%) 12 H; ≥ 0.50 ” 84 H; ≥ 1.00 ” 6-H PERIOD ENDING 00Z 05 JAN 2008

  11. OBS PRECIP (”) FCST PRECIP (”) 18 H 42 H 6-H PERIOD ENDING 06Z 19 MAR 2008

  12. OBS PRECIP (”) FCST PROB (%) 18 H; ≥ 0.50 ” 42 H; ≥ 1.00 ” 6-H PERIOD ENDING 06Z 19 MAR 2008

  13. OBS PRECIP (”) FCST PRECIP (”) 24 H 72 H HUR. IKE 6-H PERIOD ENDING 12Z 13 SEP 2008

  14. FORECAST PERFORMANCE 6-H QPF COMPARATIVE SCORES FROM 2007-08 COOL SEASON (INDEP)

  15. DAY 1 2007-08 COOL SEASON

  16. DAY 3 2007-08 COOL SEASON

  17. DAY 2 2007-08 COOL SEASON

  18. STATUS AND IMPLEMENTATION PLANS EXPERIMENTAL QPFS PRODUCED IN REAL TIME SINCE JUNE 2008 PLAN IS TO REPLACE/SUPPLEMENT GRIDDED MOS QPFS IN NDGD AROUND JAN 2010

  19. CONCLUSIONS HRMOS WILL PROVIDE IMPROVED QPF GUIDANCE OVER CONUS HRMOS QPFS WILL REPLACE & SUPPLEMENT NDGD GRIDDED MOS QPFS IN NEAR FUTURE

  20. THE END

More Related