1 / 17

Commission maritime security inspections: Synopsis of inspection results

Commission maritime security inspections: Synopsis of inspection results. Mihaela BEER, Toms TORIMS European Commission Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport Land and maritime security Unit Helsinki, September 2014. Inspections 2013 (1). 41 maritime security inspections in total

baxter-haynes
Download Presentation

Commission maritime security inspections: Synopsis of inspection results

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Commission maritime security inspections: Synopsis of inspection results Mihaela BEER, Toms TORIMS European Commission Directorate-General for Mobility and TransportLand and maritime security UnitHelsinki, September 2014

  2. Inspections 2013 (1) • 41 maritime security inspections in total • Regulation (EC) 725/2004: • 8 national administrations through 11 inspections, in 1 case also sample of RSOs; • 6 port facilities; • 12 ships.

  3. Inspections 2013 (2) • Directive 2005/65/EC: • 3 ports, • 6 national administrations through 9 inspections.

  4. The main points for improvement (1) • 1. Coordination and communication • between port facilities and ships • (namely ro-ropax); • 2. Coordination and effective communication between Member States' authorities for ports/port facilities and ships; • 3.Quality of port security plans and port facility security plans in what concerns the content and nature of access control measures – who does what, when and how;

  5. The main points for improvement (2) • 4. Integration and/or relation between port security plans and port facility security plans; • 5. Coordination between security-related authorities and the integration thereof into the respective security plans;

  6. The main points for improvement (3) • 6. Member States' conformity checking of port security plans; • 7. Member States' supervision of their own security management systems (internal and RSOs).

  7. The Commission also notes during the inspections best practices and shares them with all Member States during the MARSEC Committee and workshops such as the National Inspectors' day.

  8. Positive points (1) • 1. Increasinglevel of governance all over MSssystems (Ports/PFs and shipsside); • 2. PFSAscarried out + PFSPsdeveloped and implemented for almost all PFs; • 3.Training provided to key persons (PSOs, PFSOs, CSOs, SSOs); to security staff and other staff withoutsecurityduties;

  9. Positive points (2) • 4. Increasinglevel of implementation of the Directive (PSAscarried out; PSPsapproved and implemented and PSOsapproved) • 5. Good practices identifiedregularly in all types of inspections; • 6. High level of commitment and professionalism of the entities and individualsinvolved in the systems.

  10. Overall impact of inspection activity - Improved level of maritime security compliance in EU - Changes in Member States' legislation - Review of systems (e.g. security training)

  11. Overall impact of inspection activity - Coordination between Member State authorities - Changing / updating procedures - Issuing guidelines (e.g. model PFSA, PFSP) - Improving oversight system (e.g. RSOs)

  12. Thank you for your attention!

More Related