1 / 12

DAM Performance Issues with CRR Offers

DAM Performance Issues with CRR Offers. Steve Reedy Market Design Manager TAC 2 September 2010. Agenda. Description of issue How we got here Possible Immediate and Long-Term Solutions Going Forward. Description of issue. This is NOT a design issue; it is a Performance Issue

bayle
Download Presentation

DAM Performance Issues with CRR Offers

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. DAM Performance Issues with CRR Offers Steve Reedy Market Design Manager TAC 2 September 2010

  2. Agenda • Description of issue • How we got here • Possible Immediate and Long-Term Solutions • Going Forward Technical Advisory Committee

  3. Description of issue This is NOT a design issue; it is a Performance Issue “Theory, experience elsewhere and ERCOT trials suggest the DAM can take hours to solve if PTP Option Bids involve > a hundred (or so) source-sink pairs” (Risk Analysis Report) DAM performance is degraded when the number of distinct source/sink pairs of CRR offers in combination with the number of contingencies becomes excessive e.g.> 150 source/sink pairs x 2500 contingencies = 375000 The performance bottleneck occurs in the Power flow and Contingency Analysis module (NSM) Cause of performance degradation is sheer volume of computations involved in running Contingency Analysis on CRR Offers Technical Advisory Committee

  4. DAM Workflow Process NCUC Commitment, Dispatch & Prices NSM Power Flow, Contingency Analysis Publish Results Read Input Data Pre-Process Data Iterative process • DAM process needs to complete in approximately 3 ½ hours: (10:00 AM – 1:30 PM) • -3 ½ hour timeframe includes time for review of results by ERCOT before publishing • -3 ½ hour timeframe includes possibility of rerunning DAM in case of AS insufficiency • Based on100 distinct source/sink combinations, 2600 contingencies: • Average 6 iterations between NSM & NCUC • Average NSM execution time ≈ 8 minutes per iteration: Total= 48 minutes • Average NCUC execution time ≈ 20 minutes per iteration: Total= 2 hours • VERY TIGHT TIMELINE Technical Advisory Committee

  5. Power Flow and Contingency Analysis Determines if there are any transmission violations due to the awarded quantities of three-part offers (3PO), DAM energy only offers/bids, PTP obligation bids and CRR offers • Uses base case with approximately 2500 contingencies • 3PO, DAM energy only offers/bids, PTP obligations are such that superposition principles hold so they can be added together • Computation is the sum of 1 Base Case (larger flow computation) with 2500 Contingency Power (incremental flow computations) per hour per iteration: • (1 + 2,500)*24 = 60,024 power flows per iteration • However for CRR offers superposition principles do not holdand hence the • Computation is the product of number of distinct source/sink combinations in all the CRR Offers and number of contingencies +1 Base Case per hour per iteration: • number of distinct source/sink combinations * (1 + 2500)*24 power flows per iteration • If the number of distinct source/sink combinations = 150 then the power flows per iteration is approximately 9 million • If six iterations are needed to solve then, just for CRR Offers, the number of power flows becomes 54 million Technical Advisory Committee

  6. How We Got Here • System performance issues were identified last year and major changes were implemented to address this • Presented in 2009 at TPTF/NATF limitations for DAM Energy Only Offers/Bids, PTP Obligations Bids and CRR Offers. • Limit on CRR Offers = 2000 • Four releases focused to address these performance issues • ERCOT found satisfactory DAM performance based on assumption of CRR Offers only sinking to NOIE load zones • With only 4 NOIE load zones, performance improvements and the 2000 limit on CRR offers sufficiently limited the number of distinct source/sink combinations across all the CRR Offers in DAM • In Market Trials, there have been no reported issues with DAM performance due to CRR offers. • During risk assessment, realized that CRR offers into the DAM are not restricted to the NOIE load zones (i.e., between any settlement points) Technical Advisory Committee

  7. CRR PTP Offers: ERCOT’s Action Plan • For Go-Live: Immediate Mitigation • MMS – DAM • Potential software based improvements: • Make changes to the software which could allow the NSM processes to run faster by enabling parallelization • DAM - Network Analysis Module • Three to four weeks are required to determine the performance improvement of this option. • Additional time will be required to fully verify the functional results. • Utilize newer math libraries in the software that may improve performance • DAM – Unit Commitment, Dispatch and Pricing • At least four weeks are required to determine the performance improvement of this option. • Additional time will be required to fully verify the functional results • Potential hardware based improvements: • Upgrade to faster processors. This is being tested at ERCOT this week to determine the magnitude of performance improvement • Six to eight weeks required to migrate the ERCOT production environments to this processor se t if this option is pursued • Post Go-Live: Long Term Solution • DAM - Network Analysis Module • Potential long term software based improvement • Further enhance parallel computation capability of Network Analysis Module (NSM) • Design change: • Allow network analysis for each hour of the study period to be done in parallel • Introduce new process controller that manages these parallel network analysis modules • Manage the interface of passing transmission constraints after network analysis for all 24 hours back to the unit commitment engine • Long term option, not viable before go live Technical Advisory Committee

  8. Completed Actions • Three CRR Offer Stress Test Scenarios Run in Market Trials • 8/30 -126 pairs, 8/31 – 114 pairs, 9/1 – 164 pairs • NSM run time as expected • NCUC run time significantly longer than expected • Causes under investigation • ERCOT performed new estimate on number of CRR paths • Looked at all Resources associated with NOIE QSEs • Combined with appropriate Load Zones • Added in all possible Hub-LZ combinations • Approximately 200 total paths • First test of faster processor solution run • ~33% reduction in processing time on test case • More testing to be done on Market Trials stress test cases Technical Advisory Committee

  9. Going Forward • NOIE allocation eligibility due to ERCOT on September 8, 2010 • NOIEs to submit expected CRR offer paths on or before September 8, 2010 • ERCOT to analyze expect offer path to current CRR capabilities • Done (~200) • Follow up meeting with NOIEs during the week of September 13, 2010 to discuss allocation results and possible actions • ERCOT to coordinate CRR Offer stress test scenario in Market Trials • Done Technical Advisory Committee

  10. Questions ? Technical Advisory Committee

  11. Appendix Technical Advisory Committee

  12. Superposition Principle • 3PO, DAM energy only offers/bids, PTP obligations can cancel each other out • 100 MW injected at point A and 100 MW withdrawn at point A put 0 MW on the system • 75 MW A to B PTP Obligation and 75MW B to A PTP Obligation put 0 MW on the system • Can be modeled all at once • PTP Options (CRR Offers) do not cancel each other out • 75 MW A to B CRR Offer and 75 MW B to A CRR Offer put 75 MW on the system each direction. • Need to be modeled separately Technical Advisory Committee

More Related