1 / 17

Objetives

An Evaluation of Spain´s Advertising Self-Regulatory System A Content Analysis of AACC Cases (2005 to 2009) Mercedes Medina School of Communication University of Navarra Soontae An A.Q. Miller School of Journalism and Mass Communications Kansas State University. Objetives.

bayle
Download Presentation

Objetives

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. An Evaluation of Spain´s Advertising Self-Regulatory SystemA Content Analysis of AACC Cases (2005 to 2009)Mercedes Medina School of CommunicationUniversity of NavarraSoontae AnA.Q. Miller School of Journalism and Mass CommunicationsKansas State University

  2. Objetives • To examine recent review activities of the AACC (2005-2009) • To look at the historical evolution of AACC activities • To compare it to the activities of its U.S. counterpart, the National Advertising Division (NAD)

  3. II. About the AACC • Autocontrol existed since 1977. • AACC is one of the entities authorized by Red.es • It has signed self-regulatory agreements in different fields: Television Advertising, Confianza Online and Videogame Advertising. • AACC is a member of the European Advertising Standards Alliance. • Purposes: • a) to ensure that advertising constitutes a particularly useful instrument in the economic process, • b) to ensure respect for ethics in advertising and • c) to protect consumers´ rights. • 250 members: • all the television broadcasters and other media, • more than a hundred advertisers, • thirty advertising agencies, and • main advertising associations.

  4. EASA members Advertising self-regulation organizations

  5. Challenger Jury Advertiser Plenary Session III. Procedure Consumer associations Competitors The public AACC monitoring.

  6. IV. Method • From January 2005 until May 2009 there were 683 filed cases: • 22 mediations, • 531 claims solved by the Jury and • 129 solved by the Plenary Session. • We analyzed cases that were in the online monthly newsletters: 545 • Each case was coded based on the following criteria: • 1) product category, • 2) challenger type, • 3) media type, • 4) AACC response, • 5) advertiser response, • 6) codes and laws, and • 7) basic principles.

  7. V/1 Results

  8. V/2 Results Table 2. Media Type

  9. V/3 Results Table 3. Challenger Category * Better Business Bureaus

  10. V/4 Results Graph 4. AACC Evaluation AACC 2005-2009

  11. V/5 Results Graph 5. Responses by Advertisers AACC 2005-2009

  12. V/6 Results Table 6. Code or law AACC 2005-2009

  13. V/7 Results Table 7. Basic principles

  14. VI. Conclusions • The volume of work of the AACC has increased over the years • Product categories handled by the AACC were quite different from the NAD, pointing out several major industries of the two nations. • The challenger category showed the biggest difference between the AACC and the NAD. • AACC was actively handling cases on truthfulness and good taste, which is in contrast to its U.S. counterpart. • AACC has become responsible for controlling television content.

  15. Number of cases Number of copy advices Number of cases and copy advices 7.198 843

  16. VII. Limitations and further research • A more recent case study on NAD activities will provide a clearer picture of the NAD’s performance and allow a more accurate comparison to the AACC in recent years. • The current study prompts us to engage in more scholarly attention to the evaluation of different types of self-regulatory systems around the world.

  17. Thank youMercedes Medinammedina@unav.esSoontae Ansoontae@ksu.edu

More Related