1 / 9

Diameter Maintenance and Extensions (DIME)

Diameter Maintenance and Extensions (DIME). John Loughney, Hannes Tschofenig IETF 66, Montreal, June 2006. Note Well.

bburleson
Download Presentation

Diameter Maintenance and Extensions (DIME)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Diameter Maintenance and Extensions (DIME) John Loughney, Hannes Tschofenig IETF 66, Montreal, June 2006

  2. Note Well • Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet-Draft or RFC and any statement made within the context of an IETF activity is considered an "IETF Contribution". Such statements include oral statements in IETF sessions, as well as written and electronic communications made at any time or place, which are addressed to:-the IETF plenary session,-any IETF working group or portion thereof,-the IESG or any member thereof on behalf of the IESG,-the IAB or any member thereof on behalf of the IAB,-any IETF mailing list, including the IETF list itself, any working group or design team list, or any other list functioning under IETF auspices,-the RFC Editor or the Internet-Drafts functionAll IETF Contributions are subject to the rules of RFC 3978 and RFC 3979. Statements made outside of an IETF session, mailing list or other function, that are clearly not intended to be input to an IETF activity, group or function, are not IETF Contributions in the context of this notice. • Please consult RFC 3978 for details.

  3. Administrative Stuff • Blue Sheets! • Minute Taker? • Jabber Scribe?

  4. Agenda (1/2) 1) Agenda Bashing/Status Report Presented by the chairs 5 min. 2) Diameter Base Issues * Open Issues Presented by ext Victor Fajardo 20 minutes * URI schemes for AAA Protocols http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-garcia-dime-aaa-uri-00.txt Presented by Miguel Garcia 10 min. 3) Diameter Mobile IPv6 Application http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dime-mip6-integrated-00.txt http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dime-mip6-split-00.txt Presented by TBD 30 min.

  5. Agenda (2/2) 4) Diameter Quality of Service http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-tschofenig-dime-diameter-qos-00.txt Presented by TBD 15 min. 5) New Work * DCCA & BASE MIBs http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/dime/draft-zorn-dime-diameter-cc-app-mib-00.txt http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-zorn-dime-diameter-base-protocol-mib-00.txt Presented by Glen Zorn 10 min. * Requirement for the addition of Auditing Functionality to Diameter http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-bodin-dime-auditing-reqs-00.txt Presented by Avri Doria 10 min. * Diameter Routing Extensions http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-tsou-dime-base-routing-ext Presented by Victor Fajardo 10 min. * RADext Filter rule http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-radext-filter-rules-01.txt Presented by John Loughney 5 min.

  6. Diameter Interop Report (1/3) • Host: Ulticom • Date: April 24-28, 2006 • Meeting Minutes: http://www.tschofenig.com/dime-interop-2006/meeting-minutes.txt • Participants: • BEA Systems • Cisco Systems • IBM • Digital Route AB • Ericsson AB • IntelliNet Technologies India Private Limited • Lucent Technologies • Motorola India Electronics Pvt Ltd • Nokia Networks • Openet Telecom • Siemens AG • Toshiba America Research • Ulticom

  7. Diameter Interop Report (2/3) • Tests covered: • Diameter Base Protocol • Diameter Credit Control • Diameter NASREQ • Diameter Accounting • 3GPP specs • TLS • 5 companies provided TLS support • Complicated due to certificate format problems • SCTP • 2 companies supported SCTP • No problems • We couldn’t get Diameter EAP tests working properly. • We used the scenarios from draft-fajardo-dime-interop-test-suite-00.txt to perform most of the tests.

  8. Diameter Interop Report (3/3) Y=Implemented/Tested I=Implemented/Not Tested N=Not Implemented NA=Not Available 3.1.1.1: Capabilities Negotiation13 Y 3.1.1.2: Election 9 Y, 3 I, 1 N 3.1.1.3: Disconnection 13 Y 3.1.1.4: Re-Connection Algorithms12 Y, 1 I 3.1.1.5: Failover and Failback 3 Y, 6 I, 4 N 3.1.2.1: Peer Based Request Routing 7 Y, 2 I, 3 N, 1 NA 3.1.2.2: Realm Based Routing 7 Y, 3 I, 2 N, 1 NA 3.1.2.3: Answer Message Routing 9 Y, 1 I, 2 N, 1 NA 3.1.2.4: Loop Detection 5 Y, 4 I, 4 N 3.1.3 (Relay Support): 6 Y, 6 N, 1 NA 3.1.3 (Proxy Support): 1 Y, 2 I, 9 N, 1 NA 3.1.3.1: Redirection 1 Y, 2 I, 10 N 3.2.1.1: Connectivity and Peering - General Statemachine 6 Y, 5 I, 2 N 3.2.1.2: Connectivity and Peering - Dynamic Peer Discovery 1 I, 12 N Collected issues recoded at: http://www.tschofenig.com:8080/diameter-interop/

  9. Next Interop? • There was substantial interest at the Interop Event to schedule another event. • Is there interest from other working group members as well? • IntelliNet Technologies has volunteered to host towards the end of the year.

More Related