1 / 23

“Near term response of surface soil nitrogen cycling and pools to forest clearing and burning”

This recent research study examines the near-term response of surface soil nitrogen cycling and pools to forest clearing and burning. The study was conducted at the Teakettle Experimental Forest in the Sierra Nevada Mountains, California. The findings provide insights into the effects of restoration treatments on soil nitrogen and carbon pools, as well as nitrogen dynamics.

bcisneros
Download Presentation

“Near term response of surface soil nitrogen cycling and pools to forest clearing and burning”

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. “Near term response of surface soil nitrogen cycling and pools to forest clearing and burning” Recent soils research from the Teakettle Experimental Forest, Sierra Nevada Mountains, California Heather E. Erickson

  2. Background: Fire suppression over the last century has altered western forest ecosystems (increased tree densities, changed species compositions, and increased fuel loading) To return forest stands to “pre-suppression” conditions and to reduce the likelihood of catastrophic fires, fire and cutting are being re-introduced

  3. Background: Nitrogen is a critical element in many forest ecosystems: likely influences post-disturbance successional dynamics and recovery of forest primary productivity and other key processes Given that forest restoration will occur over large areas, important to know how soil N (and C) pools and N transformations are affected by burning and cutting treatments

  4. Experiment at Teakettle: • Designed to assess ecosystem effects of burning and thinning in mixed-conifer old growth forest (2200 m, west slope Sierra Nevada mountains) • Large (4 ha) plots afforded opportunity to examine effects of restoration treatments on soil processes

  5. What others have found: • Total N (and C) in forest soils either increase, decrease or remain the same after fire • Inorganic N increases after fire but remains elevated for usually less than a year Wan et al. 2001, Ecol Appl

  6. Teakettle is a typical mixed-conifer forest • Conifers in discreet patches (CC) • Shrub thickets (Ceanothus cordulatus) (CECO) • Open areas mostly lacking vegetation (OC) CC CECO OC

  7. Pre-treatment soils data (0-15 cm) show patches matter • Under CECO, total N pools ~ 30% greater and net N mineralization more than double compared to other patch types • Under OC, soils slightly more acidic, have a higher bulk density, and greater rock fraction percentage compared to other patch types Erickson et al., in revision, Forest Science

  8. Main research questions • What are the effects of restoration treatments on N (and C) pools and N dynamics? • Do differences among 3 patch types (CC, CECO, OC) carry over after restoration treatments?

  9. 4 Treatments (codes): burning (B) burning plus light cutting (BC) burning plus heavy cutting (BS) and an un-restored control (U) 2 (4 ha) plots for each treatment

  10. = CC = CECO = OC * * * * * • 3 patch types • 3 reps per type • 6 sub-samples per patch • Single composite sample per patch • 9 patches x 8 plots = 72 patches * 200 m

  11. ANOVA Table (Split plot) Source of variation df Treatment 3 Plot (Treatment) 4 Patch 2 Patch x Treatment 6 Patch x Plot (Treatment) 8 Residual 48 Total 71

  12. Restoration treatments completed in 2001 • Mineral horizon soils (0-15 cm) 1 and 2 years post-treatment • Total N and C (dry combustion), inorganic N, pH (water), bulk density

  13. Treatment effects (soil pools): Burning with cutting increased total N N a a a a b b b b

  14. Treatment effects (soil pools): Burning with cutting increased total N and C N C a a a a a a a a a b b b b b b b

  15. a a b a ab Patch NS b Patch effects (soil pools): Total N varied by patch pre- and post-treatment Total N - 2003 a a b

  16. Treatment effects (soil pH): Burning with cutting increased pH a a a a b b b b

  17. Patch effects (soil pH): OC patches were the most acidic pre- and post-treatment a a b a a b

  18. Treatment effects (inorganic N): Burning with cutting increased NH4-N NH4-N T x P *

  19. Treatment effects (inorganic N): Burning with cutting increased NH4-N and NO3-N NH4-N NO3-N T x P * T x P *

  20. Interaction in 2003 suggests effect of treatment depends on patch a a b b b c c c c c c

  21. Interaction in 2003 suggests effect of treatment depends on patch a a b b b c c c High nitrate in soils under CECO could be due to new N from fixation c c c

  22. Conclusions • Burning and cutting treatments (BC, BS) significantly increase soil N pools, C pools, pH, and inorganic N relative to controls • Burning alone (B) does little to affect soil properties • Near-term effects are noted two years post-treatment • Previous patch type also explains post-treatment variation in soil properties

  23. Acknowledgements • Malcolm North • USFS, PSW Range and Experiment Station • International Institute of Tropical Forestry • Model Institutions for Excellence (NSF) grant to Universidad Metropolitana • Undergraduates from Universidad Metropolitana

More Related