1 / 10

Bringing Social Innovation and Value Creation through Community Social Enterprise

Bringing Social Innovation and Value Creation through Community Social Enterprise. Dr Sarah-Anne Munoz and Artur Steinerowski O4O team members Centre for Rural Health, UHI, Inverness, UK. O4O and its background . O4O – Older People for Older People NPP project Why older people?

beatrix
Download Presentation

Bringing Social Innovation and Value Creation through Community Social Enterprise

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Bringing Social Innovation and Value Creation through Community Social Enterprise Dr Sarah-Anne Munoz and Artur Steinerowski O4O team members Centre for Rural Health, UHI, Inverness, UK

  2. O4O and its background O4O – Older People for Older People • NPP project • Why older people? -Current perception of older people -Challenges in service provision -Difficulties in providing services in remote and rural areas Policy view on social enterprise • Policy interest in social enterprise (not for profit social organisations); economic, social and environmental development • Additional benefits e.g. participation, well-being, social capital; empowering communities; tackling social exclusion

  3. Research questions and techniques • Research questions • Can social innovation and added value be successfully generated by engaging communities in innovative business models? • What is the role of researchers in social enterprise creation? • Research focus and research context • To test the feasibility of innovative organisational models in which older people provide services to other older people • Remote and rural communities from the Scottish Highlands • Research techniques • Empirical research combining ethnographic and action research techniques

  4. What happened in our communities • Community 1 • Oral history DVD • Development of community village hall as a business to generate income to support village services • Community 2 • Informal lift sharing scheme • Community car scheme • Demand responsive service • Community 3 • Community care hub • Community 4 • - Original idea of a neighbourly helping services changed into an enhancement of existing Council Handy Person scheme

  5. Process of social innovation

  6. The Role of Community Action and the Social Innovation Process • Community action is important at all stages of the social innovation process • Community Engagement • The O4O project manager facilitated community engagement • Project manager builds trust and identifies key citizens within the community • Community needs to engage with concepts of • co-design and co-production • Community Entrepreneurship • Community dialogue is • important • A collective process of needs • recognition takes place • Community comes together to • initiate social enterprise

  7. The Role of the ‘External’ Expert • An ‘external’ expert figure was often valued by community members and groups • Community Perceptions of the ‘External’ Expert • The external experts played an important role in catalysing social innovation • Someone from ‘outside’ or a university is viewed as a credible expert/ leader • The ‘External’ Expert for Rural Social Enterprise Development • The external figure can be a positive force in generating social innovation • There is a fine line between supporting the community and getting too involved • Needs connection with, and distance from, the community

  8. Building Different Levels of Legitimacy • Within the rural context, different kinds of legitimacy are central to social innovation • Legitimacy with the Community • Communities need to see social enterprises as legitimate service providers • Embedding legitimacy within the community catalyses community social innovation • Legitimacy with the Public Sector • Public sector funding is particularly important in rural areas • Need to see social enterprises as legitimate before commissioning from them • If legitimacy is not embedded the viability of the • enterprise can be jeopardised • Building Discursive Legitimacy • Competence in both civic and • public sector discourses

  9. Grounding Organisational Structure in Local Appropriateness • Tension within rural communities: translating existing voluntarism into more formalised participation • Social enterprise model must negotiate this tension • People are included AND excluded from informal helping • Must create a balance between meeting need and damaging existing informal helping structures

  10. Conclusions • Social innovation and added value can be successfully generated by engaging communities in innovative business models • Social enterprises need to be recognised as a legitimate service provider by communities and service providers • The act of coalescing of a community group predicates the emergence of social innovation • External facilitators are essential to catalyse the social innovation process • The development of a relationship between communities and public sector providers is significant in order to develop innovative social businesses Sarah-Ann Munoz, Research Fellow, Centre for Rural Health, sarah-anne.munoz@uhi.ac.uk Artur Steinerowski, Research Assistant, Centre for Rural Health artur.steinerowski@uhi.ac.uk

More Related