1 / 15

Q&A sessions at UNFCCC SB26 8 May 2007 Mr. Hans Jürgen Stehr Chair of the CDM Executive Board

Q&A sessions at UNFCCC SB26 8 May 2007 Mr. Hans Jürgen Stehr Chair of the CDM Executive Board Rajesh Kumar Sethi Vice-Chair of the CDM Executive Board. Status of the CDM | Measuring success. > 1,600 projects > 1.9 billion CERs expected to the end of 2012. In pipeline:.

bebe
Download Presentation

Q&A sessions at UNFCCC SB26 8 May 2007 Mr. Hans Jürgen Stehr Chair of the CDM Executive Board

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Q&A sessions at UNFCCC SB26 8 May 2007 Mr. Hans Jürgen Stehr Chair of the CDM Executive Board Rajesh Kumar Sethi Vice-Chair of the CDM Executive Board

  2. Status of the CDM |Measuring success > 1,600 projects> 1.9 billion CERs expected to the end of 2012 In pipeline: 655 registered CDM projects900 million CERs expected to the end of 2012 To date: (assumption: no extension of crediting periods) Map and statistics accessible from http://cdm.unfccc.int/ Status: 8 May 2007

  3. Status of the CDM |Measuring success An explosion of activities Status: 8 May 2007

  4. Region KP parties Parties with DNA Parties with project experience Parties with registered projects Annex 1 parties (AI) 37 24 n/a 14 NAI-Africa (NAI-AFR) 44 31 11 6 NAI-Asia and the Pacific (NAI-ASP) 49 33 24 19 NAI-Latin America and the Caribbean (NAI-LAC) 32 26 19 16 NAI-Other 7 8 3 3 Status of the CDM |Measuring success *number of parties with project experience can not be calculated due to lack of information Status: 8 May 2007

  5. Status of the CDM |Measuring success Sub regional: Charts look the same! Status: 8 May 2007

  6. Status of the CDM |Measuring success

  7. Status of the CDM |Measuring success Methodology development

  8. Status of the CDM |Measuring success • Processes / Procedures – defined / open to optimisation • Methodology standard: • Number increasing / consolidation / generic tools • Process being optimised and shortened • Register: • 655 registered projects • 14 rejected ( a bit more than 2.5%) • “Central bank”: • 44 million CERs for a bit more than 230 requests, • 3 rejected (less than 1.5%) • Accreditation body: Opportunity for single accreditation recognized in all Parties to KP.

  9. Status of CDM |Measuring success • The only regulated mechanism that is up and running, that ensures “real, measurable emission reductions that are additional to what would have occurred without the project.” • Transparency: - All information is public - Public comments are sought • Close to the market stakeholders: • bottom up approach • Increasing interaction/constructive dialogue • Evolving with experience

  10. Status of CDM |Measuring success • Stimulating investment flow (>19billion by 2012 (10USD) in value of the CO2 eq. reduction only) to non-Annex I countries • Giving Annex I countries flexibility in how they meet their KP commitments (presently pipeline of the magnitude of the annual emissions of Russia). • It is growing even in a context of perceived medium and long-term uncertainties

  11. Status of CDM |Key challenges CDM works, now let’s focus on: • Continuously increasing its efficiency: • Further information access, e.g. CDM Bazaar • Further access to decisions, e.g. catalogue of decisions • Further interaction with “players” , e.g. fora (DOE, DNA), project participants • Realizing its potential (scaling up) • Programme of activities (POA) • Sectors: energy efficiency / transport • Methodologies: simplicity, applicability • Regional opportunities • Regulatory optimization : relatively slim / streamlining and optimization opportunities have and will be pursued • EB to report to CMP3 its ability to deal with its “success”

  12. Status of CMP mandated tasks|Overview of status

  13. Status of CMP mandated tasks|Overview of status

  14. Thank You! Catalogue test address: http://test.cdmis.net/catalogue-test Information cdm.unfccc.int Cdm-info@unfccc.int United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change

  15. Related events during SB26|

More Related