390 likes | 417 Views
Majorana Nature of Massive ’s and 02 Decays. Zhi-zhong Xing (IHEP & UCAS, Beijing). “Majorana returns” —— Frank Wilczek Nature Physics 2009. Majorana neutrinos New form of matter. Majorana zero mode. 中科大交叉学科理论研究中心, 2017 年 03 月 10 日. Recent effects in China.
E N D
Majorana Nature of Massive ’s and 02 Decays Zhi-zhong Xing (IHEP & UCAS, Beijing) “Majorana returns” —— Frank Wilczek Nature Physics 2009 Majorana neutrinos New form of matter Majorana zero mode 中科大交叉学科理论研究中心,2017年03月10日
Recent effects in China arXiv:1703.01877, 7 March 2017 复旦大学2017年6月28日至30日 (上海交通大学PANDAX-3) International Workshop on Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay Physics
Part A Beta decays before 1930 Energy crisis = New physics? 2-body decays What to do? J. Chadwick 1914/C. Ellis 1920-1927
Part A Two ways out? giving up sth adding in sth Wolfgang Pauli (1930) Niels Bohr Dears, what attitude do you take towards new physics ???? 近来的几条乌龙: 中微子超光速、BICEPII引力波、750GeV玻色子。
Part A Solvay 1933 Pauli sold his neutrino proposal to Fermi in this congress. Paul Langevin
Part A Fermi’s theory Enrico Fermi assumed a new force for decay by combining 3 new concepts: I will be remembered for this paper. ------ Fermi in Italian Alps, Christmas 1933 ★Pauli’s idea: neutrinos ★Dirac’s idea: creation of particles ★Heisenberg’s idea: isospin symmetry
Part A 1935: 22 decays 22 decay: certain even-even nuclei have an opportunity to decay to the 2nd nearest neighbors via 2 simultaneous decays (equivalent to the decays of two neutrons). necessary conditions: arsenic germanium selenium 1935
Part A 1937: Majorana ★Theory of the Symmetry of Electrons and Positrons Ettore Majorana Nuovo Cim. 14 (1937) 171 1938年:自杀;逃往阿根廷,并在那里隐姓埋名地生活了二十几年;遁入空门;遭到绑架或杀害,以阻止他加入制造原子弹的项目;沦为乞丐;..… Enrico Fermi (1938):
Part A If this is the case, … 22 22 02 02
Part A 1939: 02 decays A 02 decay can happen if massive ’s have the Majorana nature (Wendell Furry 1939) germanium selenium Lepton number violation CP-conserving process exchange 22 background 02
Part A Nuclear matrix elements Unfortunately, nuclear matrix elements can be calculated only based on some models which describe many-body interactions of nucleons in nuclei. Since different models focus on different aspects of nuclear physics, large uncertainties (a factor of 2 or 3) are unavoidable.
Part A Half-life Comparing the 90% C.L. experimental lower limits on the half-life of a 0-decaying nuclide with the corresponding range of theoretical prediction, given a value of 0.1 eV for the effective Majorana neutrino mass term (Bilenky and Giunti, arXiv:1411.4791).
Part A The reverse is also true Schechter-Valle THEOREM (1982): if a 02 decay occurs, there must be an effective Majorana mass term. Bruno Pontecorvo’s Prediction Motivation of this talk • to look at the effective 02 mass in a geometric way; • to show the effects of Majorana phases in a 3-d graph; • to look into the well in the normal mass ordering case; • to explain why we have to go beyond the 02 decays.
Part B Oscillation data F. Capozzi et al (2014) —— the standard parametrization: Favored by Super-K T2K NOA at 2 level. It should be taken seriously!
Part B The latest news NOA (arXiv:1703.03328, 9 March 2017): my bet
Part B The effective mass The effectivemass Vissani Graph Maury Goodman asks: An intelligent design? How possible to fall into the well? A dark well = catastrophe? Vanishing 02 mass? Xing, hep-ph/0305195 • The structure of the well? • Role of Majorana phases?
Part B 3-d description sensitive insensitive Lower bound: blue; upper bound: light orange. 3 inputs of neutrino oscillation data (Xing, Zhao, Zhou, arXiv:1504.05820)
Part B Contour of the bottom Let us understand the champagne-bottle profile of the effective 02 mass term in the normal hierarchy case: Contour Bottom of the Well: not an exact ellipse The dark well in the normal hierarchy
Part B A bullet structure EXTREMUM = 0 ~ 1 meV Best-fit inputs of current data Xing, Zhao, arXiv:1612.08538
Part B The threshold or throat EXTREMUM ×
Part B To fall into the well The three-dimensional parameter space of Take it easy! It is difficult to fall into the well! Vissani Graph
Part B Model building? Why the relationship is reasonable? Remember in the quark sector as done by S. Weinberg H. Fritzsch F. Wilczek + A. Zee 1977 The effective Majorana neutrino mass matrix (Xing, Zhao, 1612.08538) Predictions, thanks to the - reflection symmetry: consistent with current data!
Part B A generic Majorana neutrino mass term reads as follows: Under -reflection, the mass term is Invariance of this transformation:
Part C Coupling-rod diagram NH NH external intersect contained NH or IH Z.Z.X., Y.L. Zhou, arXiv:1404.7001
Part C Maximum + Minimum The above diagrams allow us to obtain the maximum/minimum limit: Maximum in either hierarchy: Minimum in normal hierarchy (1) : Minimum in normal hierarchy (2): Minimum in inverted hierarchy:
Part C Occam’s razor Fewer facial parameters Entities must not be multiplied beyond necessity. Numerical illustration ZZX, Y.L. Zhou, 2015
Part C New physics In the presence of a kind of new physics, we denote: 2 very simple configurations are illustrated on the left-hand side: In the above Occam’s razor case, a pentagon can be simplified to a quadrangle.
Part C What new physics? Type (A): NP directly related to extra species of neutrinos. Example 1: heavy Majorana neutrinos from type-I seesaw In most cases the heavy contribution is negligible Example 2: light sterile neutrinos from LSND etc In this case the new contribution might be constructive or destructive Type (B): NP has little to do with the neutrino mass issue. SUSY, Left-right, and some others that I don’t understand
Part C SUSY? Example (A): R-parity violation Example (B): R-parity conservation H.V. Klapdor,hep-ex/9901021
Part C Possible effects New physics effects: Lower bound: blue; upper bound: light orange. Clearer sensitivities to mass and phase parameters (Xing, Zhao, Zhou, arXiv:1504.05820) It is hard to tell much
Part D YES or NO? QUESTION: are massive neutrinos the Majorana particles? One might be able to answer YES through a measurement of the 02 decay or other LNV processes someday, but how to answer with NO? YES or I don’t know! The same question: how to distinguish between Dirac and Majorana neutrinos in a realistic experiment? Answer 1:The 02 decay is currently the only possibility. Answer 2: In principle their dipole moments are different. Answer 3: They show different behavior if nonrelativistic.
Part D Electromagnetic properties Without electric charges, neutrinos have electromagnetic interactions with the photon via quantum loops. Given the SM interactions, a massive Diracneutrino can only have a tiny magnetic dipole moment: A massive Majorananeutrino can nothave magnetic & electric dipole moments, as its antiparticle is itself. Proof: Dirac neutrino’s electromagnetic vertex can be parametrized as Majorana neutrinos intrinsic property of Majorana’s.
Part D Transition dipole moments Both Dirac & Majorana neutrinos can have transition dipole moments (of a size comparable with _) that may give rise to neutrino decays, scattering with electrons, interactions with external magnetic field & contributions to masses. (Data: < a few 10^-11 Bohr magneton). neutrino decays scattering
Part D Nonrelativistic CB When T ~ 1 MeV after the Big Bang, the neutrinos became decoupled from thermal plasma, formed a background in the Universe. Today the relic neutrinos are nonrelativistic. Temperature today Relic neutrino capture on -decaying nuclei Mean momentum today At least 2 ’s cold today Non-relativistic ’s! 1962 (Irvine & Humphreys, 83) no energy threshold on incident ’smono-energetic outgoing electrons
Part D Towards a real experiment? 已有二十余篇论文讨论该可能性 prototype PTOLEMYPrinceton Tritium Observatory for Light, Early-Universe, Massive-Neutrino Yield (Betts et al, arXiv:1307.4738) ★CB capture rate D = Dirac M = Majorana ★ first experiment ★100 g of tritium ★graphene target ★planned energy resolution 0.15 eV PTOLEMY
Part D oscillations? Comparison: neutrino-neutrino and neutrino-antineutrino oscillation experiments. neutrino neutrino neutrinoantineutrino Feasible and successful today! Unfeasible, a hope tomorrow? Sensitivity to CP-violating phase(s):
Part D Remarks Without information on the nature of massive neutrinos (Majorana or not) and all the CP-violating phases, one will have no way to establish a full theory of masses and flavor mixing. Give 02 a chance! Theories 02 Bottom-up Top-down Experiments
Part D More LNV processes To identify the Majorana nature, CP-violating phases and new physics it is imperative to observe the 02 decays and other lepton-number-violating processes (e.g., neutrino-antineutrino oscillations, the relic neutrino background, doubly-charged Higgs decays). None is realistic
Part D Concluding remark All of us expect the massive neutrinos to be the Majorana particles. If this expectation comes true someday thanks to the 02 decay, then we will be required to have some right/good ideas to probe the Majorana phases. C.S. Wu: It is easy to do the right thing once you have the right ideas. L.C. Pauling: The best way to have a good idea is to have a lot of ideas.