650 likes | 767 Views
Educating for Reconciliation: the ‘Rights’ Approach . Peter Lewis ANTaR Victoria. www.kooriweb.org. 200 years ago…. Over 400 nations within this continent Each nation had every institution we currently have in Australia
E N D
Educating for Reconciliation: the ‘Rights’ Approach Peter Lewis ANTaR Victoria
200 years ago… • Over 400 nations within this continent • Each nation had every institution we currently have in Australia • Law, belief, occupations, family structures, trade, art, recreation and systems of ‘Government’ • People have lived on this land for over 60,000 years
Dark green area is what is also known as the Kulin Nations • Many people like to be called by their country name – Yorta Yorta, Wathaurung etc much like the Europeans prefer being called French, Irish etc.
Community Skin Group Totem Community Elders Aunties Sister Cousins Brother Cousins Grannies Uncles Parents Child Siblings Clan Moiety Traditional Circles of Nurture, Learning and Care
Aboriginal Reserves and Missions in Victoria • People of different language groups were gathered and forced to live together in places convenient to the dominant culture
Movement & Transfer of Population between Missions • Family groups were split • Young men were often sent far away to work • Young women were sent to domestic service, • Even when land was granted, it was taken back at the whim of white authority
Terra nullius ‘empty land’ no peoples, no connection to land, treated like flora and fauna ‘protection’ forced separation, forced removal, assimilation ‘whitening’ race Stolen Generations – forced separation of children No self-determination, no citizenship rights, no rights as peoples
A question of foundations • No consent, no treaty – despite instructions from Britain • Intention of proviso in Letters Patent 1836 – settlement in SA dependent on respect for Aboriginal rights – ‘always’ • Batman Treaty 1835 – not acknowledged, terms not met, leasing or possession?, temporary or permanent? • No recognised process of transfer of sovereignty or possession
Invasion and Conquest 1788- 1858 1788 Europeans arrive in Australia 1790 First Contact in many areas. Misunderstandings. Death through disease. Frontier wars. Resistance and battles. 1837 Board of Protection of Aborigines established – They were given the power to determine where Aboriginal people lived.
In 1869 the Board for the Protection of Aborigines became responsible for the administration of the Aborigines Protection Act, which in part sought: • To separate Aboriginal children from their families and communities in order to 'educate' them within a European system. • To controlwhere Aboriginal people could live, work, what kinds of jobs they could do, who they could associate with and who they could marry. Segregation 1835-1886 1869 Aboriginal Protection Act 1869 (Vic)
1933 A large camp of 200 Aboriginal people near Cumeragunja refused dole in Victoria because they were 'NSW residents', but denied assistance in NSW because they were 'too black and should apply to the NSW APB". Under the prevailing assimilation policies of the NSW APB, they were told that they were "too white" to receive rations because they were not 'predominantly Aboriginal blood‘. 1937 Assimilation Policy endorsed at the first Commonwealth State conference on Native Welfare. 1938 Petition to Queen by Australian Aborigines League. Protest at German Consulate by Australian Aborigines League
1939 Jack Patten goes to Cumeragunja in late January 1939 to talk to the residents about their failed campaign to remove manager A.J. McQuiggan. 200 Cumeragunja residents decide to 'walk-off' the reserve in protest at APB policies cross the Murray River into Victoria and set up camp at Barmah.
Assimilation 1951-1970 Assimilation Policy 1951 By 1951 all Australian governments claimed they had adopted a policy of 'assimilating' Aboriginal people into the wider society The policy was defined as: ... All Aborigines and part-Aborigines are expected eventually to attain the same manner of living as other Australians and to live as a member of a single Australian community enjoying the same rights and privileges, accepting the same beliefs, hopes and loyalties as other Australians. However, the policy of assimilation was more devastating as the aim was to "breed" out the Aborigines' and Islander peoples' "traits" and to westernise the so called "half-castes".
Learning from the past – Stolen Generations The practice of removal was based on the assumption that • disconnection from Aboriginal culture was in the best interests of the child and • Aboriginal communities should not determine their own future
Assimilation 1951-1970 1957 Aborigines Protection Board changed to Aborigines Welfare Board to assist the assimilation policy 1966 Policy shift: Indigenous children should stay with their families if possible 1967 Inthe 1967 referendum, an overwhelming majority of Australians (more than 90%), and all the States, voted in favour of amending the Federal Constitution so that Aborigines could be counted in reckoning the population of Australia and that the Commonwealth had responsibility for Aboriginal Affairs.
The Great Australian Silence Inattention on such a scale cannot possibly be explained by absentmindedness. It is a structural matter, a view from a window which has been carefully placed to exclude a whole quadrant of the landscape. What may well have begun as a simple forgetting of other possible views turned under habit and over time into something like a cult of forgetfulness practised on a national scale. We have been able for so long to disremember the Aborigines that we are now hard put to keep them in mind even when we most want to do so. W.E.H.Stanner, After the Dreaming: The Boyer Lectures
Post 1967 Policies 1972 Tent Embassy. Aboriginal flag designed. Whitlam Government Policy of Self Determination for Aboriginal people is adopted by Federal Government replacing earlier policies of protectionism and assimilation. 1975 Land Rights Acts. Racial Discrimination Act. Mostly bi-partisan approach to Indigenous affairs. 1970s Establishment of many Aboriginal organisations.
Post 1967 Policies 1989 Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody – discovered that 43 out of 99 deaths in custody were of people who were separated from their families as children 1991 Bi-partisan Policy of Reconciliation. Establishment of Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation. 1992 High Court Mabo Decision (end of bi-partisan approach) and PM Keating’s Redfern Speech
Post 1967 Policies 1996 Wik Decision – pastoral leases don’t necessarily extinquish native title 1997 National Inquiry into Separation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children from their families “Bringing Them Home Report” Victorian Parliament apologises for the forcible removal of Indigenous children. Federal Government doesn’t apologise 1998 First Sorry Day. Native Title Amendment Act passed
Post 1967 Policies 2000 Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation Final Report calls for ‘negotiated framework agreement’. Reconciliation Walks – 1 000 000 participate in walks across the nation 2004 Federal Government announces the mainstreaming of Government services and the abolition of ATSIC 2007 Federal Government announces the NT Emergency Intervention. Overrides Racial Discrimination Act
Colonisation as an ongoing toxic reality • Loss of self-determination (disempowerment) • Treated as client communities • Loss of economic and social capacity (disadvantage) • Unemployment (15%) • Incarceration (13.3 times more likely) • Child protection (7.7 times more likely) • Life expectancy (12 years less) • Pervasiveness of racism and cultural abuse/disrespect
The Howard Years:Federal Policy Impasse • Acknowledging the past and its impact on the present vs. denialism • Self-determination vs. mainstreaming • Restoring capacity through cultural respect vs. blaming culture • Addressing the ‘unfinished business’ vs. ‘practical reconciliation’
Rudd Government Approaches • Apology to the Stolen Generations and Welcome to Country • Adjustments to NT Emergency Intervention • National Indigenous Representative Body • Signing of the UN Declaration on Indigenous Rights • Healing Foundation • Evidence-based Approach • Closing the Gap
The NT Intervention Issues • the suspension of the Racial Discrimination Act • hasn’t followed the recommendations of the “Little Children Are Sacred” Report • the blanket treatment of all welfare recipients and the loss of dignity and shame that people experience when shopping with their compulsory BasicsCard • Reported drop in nutrition statistics • Government Business Managers have replaced Aboriginal community councils • that more well being and health comprehensive services should all be provided.
Closing the Gap targets • Close the gap in life expectancy between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians within a generation: Currently the gap has been revised to 11.5 years for Indigenous men and 9.7 years for Indigenous women. • Halve the gap in mortality rates for Indigenous children under five by 2018: Indigenous children under 5 are more likely to die than non-Indigenous children.
• Ensure access to early childhood education for all Indigenous four year olds in remote communities by 2013: Just over 60 per cent of Indigenous children are enrolled in early childhood education programs in the year before school compared to around 70 per cent for all children. • Halve the gap in reading, writing and numeracy achievement for Indigenous children by 2018: Only 63.4 per cent of Indigenous Year 5 students were at or above the national minimum standard for reading compared to 92.6 per cent of their non-Indigenous counterparts.
• • Halve the gap for Indigenous students in Year 12 or equivalent attainment rates by 2020: Non‑Indigenous 20–24 year olds are almost twice as likely to attain a Year 12 or equivalent qualification as their Indigenous counterparts. • Halve the gap in employment outcomes between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians by 2018: In 2008, almost 54 per cent of the Indigenous working-age population was employed compared with 75 per cent of the non‑Indigenous working-age population.
Victorian Aboriginal Children Policy • Self-determination • Best interests of the child • Acknowledgement of importance of Aboriginal culture and connection for the child • Aboriginal Child Placement Principle • Transfer of authority to Aboriginal agencies • Cultural plans • Cultural competence
Forces For and Against Cultural Safety a) internal strength-based processes within Aboriginal communities which encourage cultural resilience and resistance and b) external processes of the colonised environment which are generated from the broader society.
Cultural resilience and resistance • Community wealth – extended family networks, looking after each other – demonstrating elasticity (functionality in the face of risk) and buoyancy (ability to recover from trauma) • Story telling – of creator spirits, key land marks, contemporary stories • History of resistance – eg. Cold Morning, Jupiter, Cocknose, Barak, Cooper, the Walk Off, Patton, setting up of Koorie orgs • Cultural expression – songs/music and art
Addressing the causal factors The problem • No self-determination • Little respect for culture • Fear and mistrust The answer • Self-determination, capacity building, partnerships and cultural competence
Colonisation and its Echoes • Homelessness– terra nullius/empty land, disconnection from land, moved onto reserves/missions • Powerlessness – no law, lack of acknowledgment of Aboriginal authorities, not citizens until 1967, lack of real self-determination • Poverty – no ownership, no recognition of traditional economies, limited access to dominant culture economy, dependency • Disorientation/Confusion – nowhere, no place in dominant culture, cultural in-competence of mainstream, constant policy changes and confusion, racism (above factors identified by W.E.H Stanner in the 60s)
Three Keys to Cultural Safety • Respect for, and processes towards, self-determination • Resourcing Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander-led Solutions • Respect for culture and addressing racism
Human rights based social investment framework: - recognises that colonisation has impacted negatively on Indigenous social and economic capacity, - builds on the strengths of Indigenous culture - respects the self-determining rights of Indigenous communities in order to re-build capacity. Human rights as an inclusion and investment strategy