CH3Br, 241109 Relative ion intensities and trend summary & “impurity threshold”

CH3Br, 241109 Relative ion intensities and trend summary & “impurity threshold” agust,heima,...Nov09/CH3Br-Overall +mass-041109km-241109ak.pxpagust,heima,...Nov09/CH3Br-Overall +mass-221109km-241109ak.pxp agust,www,...Nov09/PPT-241109ak.ppt Agust,heima,...Nov09/XLS-241109ak.xls

Agust,heima,...Nov09/CH3Br-Overall +mass-041109km-241109ak.pxp: agust,heima,...Nov09/CH3Br-Overall +mass-221109km-241109ak.pxp: CH3+ + Br- threshold 76672 75887 75395 74245 73920 72970 72674 72236 69938 68882 68675

agust,heima,...Nov09/CH3Br-Overall +mass-041109km-241109ak.pxp: agust,heima,...Nov09/CH3Br-Overall +mass-221109km-241109ak.pxp: CH3+ + Br- threshold 76672 75887 75395 74245 73920 72970 72674 72236 68882 68675

It looks as if the a significant change in relative ion intensities, in terms of increasing I(CH+)/I(CH3+) I(CH2+)/I(CH3+) I(Br+)/I(CH3+) -for “Rydberg state + bgr-signals” with energy does not happen significantly untill from about 75395 cm-1 -> 75887 -> 76672 After which it drops, i.e. The mayjor trend is as:

I(CH+)/I(CH3+) I(CH2+)/I(CH3+) I(Br+)/I(CH3+) This needs verification (?) from KM (i.e. “table values for relative Intensities”)

agust,heima,...Nov09/CH3Br-Overall +mass-041109km-241109ak.pxp: agust,heima,...Nov09/CH3Br-Overall +mass-221109km-241109ak.pxp: CH3+ + Br- threshold 76672 75887 75395 74245 73920 Why is this mass spectrum so noizy?? 72970 72674 “impurity threshold” (??) 72236 68882 68675

CH3Br, 241109 Relative ion intensities and trend summary & “impurity threshold”