1 / 25

Staff Access to ICT Based Communications in Further and Higher Education

Staff Access to ICT Based Communications in Further and Higher Education. A JISC-funded study Louise Cooke and Helen Greenwood. About the Day. Introductions and welcome Programme for the day Project findings Peter Falconer, Lauder College Clare Holden, Loughborough College

belva
Download Presentation

Staff Access to ICT Based Communications in Further and Higher Education

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Staff Access to ICT Based Communications in Further and Higher Education A JISC-funded study Louise Cooke and Helen Greenwood 31st October 2006

  2. About the Day • Introductions and welcome • Programme for the day • Project findings • Peter Falconer, Lauder College • Clare Holden, Loughborough College • Claire Bradshaw, Loughborough University • Discussion Forum and JISC update 31st October 2006

  3. Aims of the Project • Investigate restrictions on staff access to ICT-based communications in FE and HE • What groups of staff are affected by restrictions on access? • What factors contribute to restricted access? • What impact do restrictions have on the efficiency and effectiveness of institutions and individuals? • Identify examples of best practice. 31st October 2006

  4. Methodological Approach • Desk research • Questionnaire survey • Survey design and piloting • Target population • Case studies • Selection of sites • Semi-structured interviews • Review of policies 31st October 2006

  5. The Questionnaire Survey • Response from one third of both sectors • Typically received from Heads of IT/ IS or ILT/ e-learning / Learning Resources Managers • Data analysis • By sector • Presentation of data 31st October 2006

  6. Questionnaire and Case Study Themes • Institutional communication and accesspolicies • Electronic and hard copy information dissemination • Who has restricted access to ICT? • What effect does this have for the individual and for the institution? • ICT training and skills • Current initiatives to improve access and institutional communication. 31st October 2006

  7. The Case Studies Six sites were visited: • Causeway Institute • Lauder College • Loughborough College • University of Wales, Bangor • University of Chichester • Loughborough University … 31st October 2006

  8. The Case Studies cont. A range of personnel were interviewed, including: • IT and/or Information Services • Estates Department • Equality and Diversity • E-learning Champion • Staff Development and Human Resources • Teaching staff • Trade Union representative 31st October 2006

  9. Findings: Communications Policies • Many do not have a formal policy, but strategy documents commit to increased use of e-communication • FE significantly more likely to have policies than HE • LC has ‘Electronic Communication Policy’, Chichester has ‘Internal Communication Policy’ • Move toward electronic information dissemination, but hard copy is still popular: ‘people like paper’. • In around 80% of responding institutions, corporate documentation is made available on paper, but often only on request … 31st October 2006

  10. Communications Policies cont. • Reliance on line managers to cascade information • Development and promotion of intranet • Use of portal solution (Chichester) • Appointment of Director of Corporate Communications (Bangor) 31st October 2006

  11. Findings: Access to PCs • Policies governing principles of access are more common than communications policies 31st October 2006

  12. Access to PCs cont. • PC provision is generally good, with increased use of laptops for loan or home access • Schemes for staff purchase of PCs • All staff entitled to user a/c and email and open access facilities are available to all • Recognition of needs of users with visual impairment • Recognition of need for all staff to use ICT … 31st October 2006

  13. Access to PCs cont. • BUT part-time and/or community-based teaching staff often experience access difficulties • Staff employed by contractors are not usually given access • Devolved PC purchasing can lead to inequalities • Manual staff usually have low specification PCs. 31st October 2006

  14. Questionnaire Findings: Factors affecting access 31st October 2006

  15. ICT Skills and Training • ‘Totally inclusive’ staff development policies vs. institutions where not all staff groups have access to ICT training • Training for staff in manual occupations may have low take-up • Skills levels of teaching personnel are variable • Use of ILT champions • Information literacy skills as important as IT skills • Induction is key opportunity … 31st October 2006

  16. ICT Skills and Training cont. • New systems drive training needs • Time constraints limit opportunities for training, especially for PT and non-desk-based staff • Peer mentoring/buddying • Good examples of special initiatives for manual staff • Importance of leadership and ‘culture of learning’ 31st October 2006

  17. Drivers of wider ICT use • Government funding initiatives and quality reviews, e.g. DEL e-learning strategy in N. Ireland, IiP • Increased use of ILT • Impact of implementation of new e-systems (e.g. e-registration, facilities management and finance) • Information overload 31st October 2006

  18. Technological Initiatives • Electronic Independent Student Learning Agreements (ISLAs), e-registers, e-finance systems, e-facilities management systems etc. • Potential of mobile, handheld and wireless technologies • VoIP technology • ‘Personalisation’ of the learning environment via SMS, podcasts etc. 31st October 2006

  19. Other Initiatives • ICT training initiatives • IT Awareness Week • Targeting of information dissemination • Initiatives to achieve upwards communication 31st October 2006

  20. Challenges and Barriers • Fear, apprehension and ‘inverse snobbery’ • Lack of motivation or perception of need • Intranets can become ‘bulging’ and difficult to navigate • Reliance on line managers can lead to patchy information provision • Line managers’ attitudes, especially with regard to trust … 31st October 2006

  21. Challenges and Barriers cont. • Lack of systems integration • Geographic location especially distributed estates • Financial considerations • Manual staff and PT staff face particular barriers • 24/7 culture • Need to retain ‘personal touch’ 31st October 2006

  22. Emergent Themes • Motivation is a bigger issue than PC access • Need to secure support and engagement of managerial and supervisory staff at all levels • How information is communicated is more important than what technology is provided 31st October 2006

  23. Implications and Further Work • Methods appeared satisfactory to achieve aims and objectives • Potential to learn from existing examples of good communication practice • Managing information overload • Policy development, dissemination and implementation guidelines • Longitudinal approach to measure improvement over time 31st October 2006

  24. Acknowledgments • JISC • Questionnaire pilots • Questionnaire respondents • Case study participants • LISU staff PLEASE ASK QUESTIONS! 31st October 2006

  25. DISCUSSION POINTS • JISC – Future directions • Observations and questions from today’s sessions • How do these findings compare with your own experience and practice? • Do you have any examples of initiatives in your own institution to add to those already discussed? • What should be the balance between hard copy and electronic information provision? • Would it be useful to have guidelines for policy development in this area? • How can we evaluate progress in this area? • Has today been useful for you? 31st October 2006

More Related