1 / 12

Network Information System

Network Information System. IM meeting, Estes Park ‘06. EML status of LTER sites. I ñ igo San Gil. Sep 19 2006. EML status of LTER sites. Almost all the LTER sites have implemented the EML standard. The same LTER sites, have made EML metadata available at centralized servers.

bena
Download Presentation

Network Information System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Network Information System IM meeting, Estes Park ‘06 EML status of LTER sites Iñigo San Gil Sep 19 2006

  2. EML status of LTER sites Almost all the LTER sites have implemented the EML standard. The same LTER sites, have made EML metadata available at centralized servers. These “Metacat” servers have harvested 4,900 EML documents from LTER sites. “Harvested" here is loosely defined as:  at least a few metadata sets of low content placed in the server. Also, the site has a good plan to place all legacy data in, and with specific plans to enrich EML, if appropriate. Over half of the LTER sites have attribute-level EML. This means that potentially, the associated data can be accessed and interpreted programatically. LTER Network Information System

  3. LTER Sites EML Status Outline EML: Past, Present and Future Past & present – How is LTER’s EML? Future – What needs to be done? WHY? LTER Network Information System

  4. EML status of LTER sites LTER’s EML past: Last year, some sites had yet to harvest, furthermore, some LTER sites had to implement the EML standard. This text is taken from last year “EML Status” report at the 2005 IM Montreal meeting. Now we show how these sites fared. “ How about the 25% ? FCE About to be harvested to an high EML level KNZ Has very rich EML metadata HFR Has implemented EML level 3ish. (To complete: Entity table) PAL Focus on site reorganization process long term plans CDR Working on EML implementation and harvest as we speak BNZ Positively intrigued about it JRN On the verge of posting level 5 EML for 70% of datasets ” harvested harvested harvested harvested harvested harvested LTER Network Information System

  5. Jan-05 Apr-05 Jul-05 Oct-05 Jan-06 Apr-06 Jul-06 LTER Sites EML Evolution : Graph LTER’s EML past & present EML evolution over time Graph shows how the EML implementation changed over the last year and half Number of LTER sites LTER Network Information System

  6. ARC BNZ AND CDR HBR HFR NTL PIE KBS BES SGS NWT KNZ VCR SBC CWT LNO CCE CAP GCE SEV JRN PAL FCE MCM EML status of LTER sites: Present You can see a first order categorization of the EML Tier levels implemented at the sites There are fine differences not noted in the figure, such as the percentage of metadata converted to EML and the precise richness content Attribute Level EML No Attribute info No EML MCR LUQ LTER Network Information System

  7. EML status of LTER sites: Some numbers Site Harvesting Since TIER level Harvested sets % EML/ % Harvested AND Jun ’05 5 130 124 100 / 100 ARC Apr ’05 2 ½1598 1585 100 / 100 BES Apr ’05 2100 2 80 / 80 5 / 5 CAP Aug ’04 5 79 30 90 / 70 100 25 CWT May ’05 2 ½ 190 100 / 97 GCE Apr ’04 5 279 245 100 / 100 HBR Jul ’04 4 112 100 / 100 KBS Aug ’04 5 41 40 100 / 100 LNO Jan ’05 2 (a few 4) 360 100 / 100 LUQ May ’05 3 ½ 96 100 / 100 NTL Apr ’05 5 46 43 90 / 90 NWT Jun ’05 2 ½ 139 100 / 100 PIE Jul ’05 2 ½118 111 100 / 100 SEV Jul ’05 597 46 50 / 50 SGS Aug ’05 3 9 10 / 10 DB work VCR Jul ’05 5 110 63100 / 100 BLUE, Sept 2006 number BLACK, Aug 2005 number LTER Network Information System

  8. EML status of LTER sites: Some numbers Site Harvesting Since TIER level # Docs % EML / % Harvested BNZ Oct – 053.5139 90 / 90 - / - CDR Jun - 06 5 617 95 / 95 - / - FCE Sep – 05 5 265 100 / 100 100 / 0 HFR Mar - 06 3+ 96 100 / 100 100 / 0 JRN Sep - 05 5 50 35 / 35 - / - KNZ Aug - 05 5 43 100 / 100 100 / 0 MCM Feb - 06 5 167 100 / 100 5 / 5 SBC ’04 5 22 100 / 100 PAL N/A -- -- -- / -- -- / -- MCR New Site CCE New Site BLUE, Sept 2006 number BLACK, Aug 2005 number LTER Network Information System

  9. EML status of LTER sites: Looking at the Future Room for improvement ? Attribute Level EML -- units QA / QC -- make sure documents are accurate Direct, unobstructed URL links or Inline Data WHY improve?“If it aint broke, dont fix it” Check out what can we do today withWELL documented data See Trends Demo/workshop, Explore Kepler & ASM posters. LTER Network Information System

  10. Why Would Anyone Do Good EML: Synthesis tools Excerpts from anASM poster LTER Network Information System

  11. Why Would Anyone Do Good EML: Trends NIS Trends: A web companion to the Trends book. Visualization of long term datasets LTER Network Information System

  12. Why Would Anyone Do Good EML: Kepler Kepler: An open source tool to design & execute scientific workflows.

More Related