360 likes | 532 Views
Judy Benjamin is a Sleeping Beauty, modulo Monty Hall. Luc Bovens Progic Conference September 2009. Written work. Bovens, L. “Judy Benjamin is a Sleeping Beauty” Analysis , 2010. CV version Published version 1 and 2
E N D
Judy Benjamin is a Sleeping Beauty, modulo Monty Hall Luc Bovens Progic Conference September 2009
Written work • Bovens, L. “Judy Benjamin is a Sleeping Beauty” Analysis, 2010. • CV version • Published version 1 and 2 • Bovens, L. and Ferreira, J.L. “Monty Hall drives a wedge between Judy Benjamin and the Sleeping Beauty: a reply to Bovens” Analysis (forthcoming)
JB and SB • Judy Benjamin Problem • Van Fraassen, B. 1981, A Problem for Relative Information Minimizers in Probability Kinematics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 32, 4, 375-9. • Sleeping Beauty Problem • Elga, A. 2000. Self-locating belief and the Sleeping Beauty problem. Analysis 60: 143–47.
SB ½’ers • Beauty did not learn anything new upon awakening, so why should she change her beliefs? • Response: She did learn something new in SB’!
½’ers Justification: Bradley’s Adams conditioning: Learning a conditional should not affect your credence for its antecedent.
RAA of Adams Conditioning • What did SB’ learn? • If Heads, then ¬Tu • If Tu, then ¬Heads • So by Adams Conditioning: • ? => 0 • So if Beauty is told in addition that Tails came up, then she should infer that Tu. Absurd
Symmetry • P(B) = P(Q) • P(Q|R) = 1 • P(Q|B) = 1/2 • P(Q) = P(Q|B)P(B) + P(Q|R)(1-P(B)) =>P(B) = 2/3
‘Judy Benjamin is a Monty Hall.’(Jose Luis Ferreira)=> joint work with J.L. Ferreira
Monty Hall • Three doors. One door has a car, two doors have donkeys behind them. You pick door x. Monty Hall opens up door y and a donkey walks out. What is the probability that the door is behind door x? • P(CX | DY) = • “The change represented by [the formula for conditional probability] is defensible and justifiable only on the basis of the protocol that tells circumstances under which the [new information] will be acquired.” (Shafer, G. “Conditional Probability”, 1985) • Two protocols: • Monty Hall opens up one of the two remainingdoors and this door is bound to have a donkey behind it. • Monty Hall opens up one of the two remaining doors – it may or may not have a donkey behind it.
Monty Hall - 1 P(@=CX | Info = DY) =
Monty Hall - 2 P(@=CX | Info =DY) =
Judy Benjamin • The informer checks SE and reports to JB whether she is there or not. • {“SE”, “¬SE”} • The informer checks all quadrants and informs JB of one quadrant where she is not—suppose that the machine can only provide one true negative. • {“¬NE”, “¬SE”, “¬NW”, “¬SW”} • The informer checks East and informs JB of one quadrant where she is not—suppose that the machine can only provide one true negative. • {“E→¬N”, “E →¬S”}
Judy Benjamin P(@=W |Info=“E→¬S”) = 2 × P(@=NW | Info=“E→¬S”) =
Sleeping Beauty’’ • SB is put to sleep on Su knowing • A fair coin has been tossed • There will be awakenings on Mo or Tu • One combination is ruled out, but we do not know which • Amnesia is induced after each awakening of all the info gained over and above the Su info • After the awakening, info is provided which combination is ruled out.
Sleeping Beauty” P(@=W / INFO=¬SE) = 2 × P(@=NW / INFO=¬SE) =
Judy Benjamin • The informer checks SE and reports to JB whether she is there or not. • {“SE”, “¬SE”} • P(@=W | Info = “¬SE”) = 2/3 • The informer checks all quadrants and informs JB of one quadrant where she is not. • {“¬NE”, “¬SE”, “¬NW”, “¬SW”} • P(@=W | Info = “¬SE”) = 2/3 • The informer checks East and informs JB of one quadrant where she is not—suppose that the machine can only provide one true negative • {“E→¬N”, “E →¬S”} • P(@=W | Info = “E→¬S”) = 1/2
Judy Benjamin P(@=W / INFO=¬SE) = 2 × P(@=NW / INFO=¬SE) =
Judy Benjamin • The informer intends to check East, is unable to check NE due to the cloud cover, does check SE and reports to JB whether she is there or not. • {“SE”, “¬SE”} • {“SE”, “E →¬S”} • P(@=W| Info = “E →¬S”) = 2/3 • The informer checks East and informs JB of one quadrant where she is not—suppose that the machine can only provide one true negative • {“E→¬N”, “E →¬S”} • P(@=W| Info = “E→¬S”) = 1/2
Judy Benjamin’ P(@=W |Info=“E→¬S”) = 2 × P(@=NW | Info=“E→¬S”) =
Sleeping Beauty • Beauty is told on Su that a fair coin is flipped and that there are awakenings on Mo and Tu. Upon each awakening, she will be told some Heads quadrant in which she is not: • P(@ = Ta | Info = “¬He-Tu) = 1/2 • Upon awakening, the informer reveals to Beauty the structure of the game, viz. that the awakening may be taking place in any world-time quadrant, except for the quadrant Heads-Tu. • P(@ = Ta| Info = “¬He-Tu”) = 2/3
Sleeping Beauty P(@=W |Info=“E→¬S”) = 2 × P(@=NW | Info=“E→¬S”) =
Igor Douven and Jan-Willem Romeijn‘A New Resolution to the Judy Benjamin Problem’
Modus Ponens • ‘If it rains, then no sundowners’ • Keep Probability of rain fixed at ½ • Adjust probability of no Sundowners from ½ to ¾ • Probability of rain is more deeply epistemically entrenched than probability of Sundowners
Modus Tollens • ‘If he robbed him, then he shot him’ • Keep Probability of not-Shot fixed at ½ • Adjust probability of Robbed from ½ to 1/4 • Probability of not-Shot is more deeply epistemically entrenched than probability of Robbed
Questions • Epistemic entrenchment and probabilism? • Beta-functions? • Epistemic entrenchment in the JB? • Epistemic entrenchment in the SB? • If not, then what?