140 likes | 254 Views
ERP Credit Workgroup . 2005 Northeast Environmental Summit September 28, 2005 Sam Silverman – Moderator, EPA Region I Beth Termini – OPEI & Region I Steve DeGabriele – MA DEP Caroline Petti - OECA. ERP Credit Workgroup.
E N D
ERP Credit Workgroup 2005 Northeast Environmental Summit September 28, 2005 Sam Silverman – Moderator, EPA Region I Beth Termini – OPEI & Region I Steve DeGabriele – MA DEP Caroline Petti - OECA
ERP Credit Workgroup • ERP Credit Workgroup - response to isssues raised by MA DEP’s request to EPA for ERP dry cleaner credit • Group worked on this specific model and its issues to help inform future proposals • Group includes: NE States, OES, OPEI and OECA • Subgroups formed around specific issues
MA ERP Credit Proposal • Credit in the PPA for addressing 600 dry cleaners through ERP: ·380 tons/yr hazardous waste (environmental footprint ≈ 30 large quantity generators) · 250 tons/yr hazardous air pollutants ( environmental footprint ≈ 25 major air facilities) Email steven.degabriele@state.ma.us for copy of proposal
Why did MA DEP propose this? • Scarce resources must yield greatest environmental benefit • MA believes its success on “majors” allows greater opportunities for environmental gains at smaller sources • EPA should continue to support innovative programs • Greater payoff if meaningful PPA credit from EPA for innovative program results • Results-driven decision-making – Trust, but verify
The Essential Elements of an ERP • Valid measurement system • Self-certification and return to compliance plans • Compliance assistance • Compliance assurance and enforcement
What is “credit?” • Recognition: Official EPA agreement that activities are important parts of state’s overall compliance program in an expanding universe of sectors • Offset: Substitute some ERP-like program activities and their results for some amount of core activities and results • Key issues: • Offsets: How/when to determine? Are results needed first? • Adequacy of core program: How will EPA evaluate and apply it to credit?
Describing ERP Projectsin PPAs and National Data Systems • ERP Matrix will describe program in PPA & on EPA website • Includes “environmental footprint,” results, planned & actual activities • Place ERP matrix on, or linked to, one or more EPA websites • Tracking of ERP activities in EPA systems such as AIRS/AFS or RCRA Info not recommended at this time • Key: Data on ERP activities/results widely available to public and regulators
ERP Model Matrix Example Key Elements Sector Specific Info.
DATA: What and how much to collect and report to get credit for ERP? • Credit continuum: based on program results and amount and specificity of data • Concern that bar not be set too high • Data depends upon stage of ERP development • Key issue: How to credit when data is limited (e.g., where only resource investments and environmental footprints are known)
Proposed Role for Element 13 Work Group in Reviewing State Applications for Credit • Proposals submitted by state to region • Small group of submitting state, affected Region and OECA make preliminary determination whether to offer credit • Determination discussed with Element 13 Work Group • Element 13 Work Group then develops general guidance for the state submittal and regional review of similar state proposals for credit
MassDEP ERP Credit Proposal Addendum • Completed ERP Matrix for Dry cleaners • Environmental Performance Profiles for HW Large Quantity Generators and Air “Majors” • Key issues: • Regulated group performance vs. agency oversight performance • Burden of proof
Next Steps • MA to submit proposal addendum with specific data and request for offset credit • EPA response to the MA ERP proposal for recognition credit • Coordinate with Element 13 Work Group on managing and reviewing proposals • Continue offset credit discussion with ERP Credit Work Group (Region, MA, other New England states, OECA & OPEI) • Expand ERP credit dialogue beyond New England and engage states on submitting proposals for credit
Discussion Topics for Today • Issue #1: What are the barriers preventing other states from seeking credit for their innovative compliance programs? • Issue #2: What assistance can EPA provide states in overcoming those barriers?