1 / 42

Political Development and Governance

PIA3395 Development Theories: PhD Reading Seminar. Political Development and Governance. Khurram Butt Kevin Jeong Aya Okada. Main Points. Both theoretical and empirical approaches were observed.

benjamin
Download Presentation

Political Development and Governance

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PIA3395 Development Theories: PhD Reading Seminar Political Development and Governance Khurram Butt Kevin Jeong Aya Okada

  2. Main Points • Both theoretical and empirical approaches were observed. • Literatures discuss political development both as independent variable (input) and dependent variable (output). • Political development was not discussed in isolation but as something closely related to other factors in the society. • Psycho-social, Cultural, Managerial, etc.

  3. Golden Oldies • Berger, P.L. (1974). Pyramids of Sacrifice. pp.1-113. • Huntington, S.P. (1968). Political Order in Changing Societies. Chapter 1.

  4. Berger (1974) Pyramids of Sacrifice • Questions the sacrifice brought about by capitalism and socialism • Myths of social change: growth and revolution • Failure of intellectuals and policy makers • Cautions the Third World for its route to development The Great Pyramids in Cholula Mexico

  5. Capitalism – Myth of Growth • Claims: economy based on market mechanism “Trickle-down” effect productivity and efficiency individual freedom • Costs: increasing disparities deprivation and anomie “Man does not live by bread alone.”

  6. Socialism – Myth of Revolution • Claims: Egalitarian society through redemptive revolution. • Costs: 1. Constant terror of human liberty due to its innate nature of totalitarian tendency coming. 2. Not free from political inequality problem • Paradoxical Realities of Soviet Revolution and China • What does Berger’s critiques of both systems account for alternative development in the Third World? Combined or Pluralistic Model with less costs and more benefits? Is it possible?

  7. Question: What are the similarities and differences between Berger and Huntington? • No Free Lunch and ? • Stability First Versus Individual Freedom First?

  8. “Political Order and Political Decay”in Huntington (1968) Political Order in Changing Societies • Asserts that ‘form’ of government does not necessarily guarantee ‘degree’ of government • ‘Government’ is pretty much taken to be synonymous with ‘authoritative control’ • Countries of Asia, Africa and Latin America have “… a shortage of political community and of effective, authoritative, legitimate government.” (Political gap)

  9. “Political Order and Political Decay”in Huntington (1968) Political Order in Changing Societies • Violence, instability and general decline in political order in Asia, Africa and Latin America • Product of rapid social change and the rapid mobilization of new groups into politics coupled with the slow development of political institutions • Huntington takes a critical view of ‘mobilization’ and ‘participation’ and instead emphasizes ‘institutionalization’

  10. “Political Order and Political Decay”in Huntington (1968) Political Order in Changing Societies • Pillars of political community: scope of support and level of institutionalization • Institutions are stable, valued, recurring patterns of behavior • Institutionalization is the process by which organizations and procedures acquire value and stability • Adaptability, Complexity, Autonomy, Coherence

  11. “Political Order and Political Decay”in Huntington (1968) Political Order in Changing Societies • Political modernization • Rationalization of authority • New political functions and structures to perform them • Participation in politics by social groups throughout society • Differentiation between direction of change and the political effects of social, economic and cultural modernization

  12. “Political Order and Political Decay”in Huntington (1968) Political Order in Changing Societies • It is not the absence of modernity but the efforts to achieve it which produce political disorder • Critical of ‘economic backwardness leads to violence’ hypothesis; disruptive influence of mod. • Expectation/Satisfaction gap that leads to social frustration and dissatisfaction • Address the gap through socio-economic mobility and adaptable political institutions • Corruption as a ‘consequence’ of modernization

  13. Literary Map Evolution of Development Theory (Martinussen) Post-Colonial Political Development (Heady) Colonialism as Psychological Regime (Nandy) Culture as the Key for Development Management (Staudt) Consequences of Ideology (Berger) Political Development and Governance Development Management (Esman) Critique Methodological & Conceptual (Leys) Political Participation and Institutionalization (Two Hungtingtons)

  14. Huntington (1996) Clash of Civilizations (Chapter 8 and 9) • Discordance between the West’s efforts to promote universal Western culture to the rest and its declining ability to do so. • Antagonistic relationship among civilizations - not trust and friendship • Intercivilizational conflicts - fault line conflicts (micro) - core state conflicts (macro)

  15. “Colonization of the Mind”by Ashis Nandy in Rahnmea & Bawtree (1994) The Post-Development Reader • Waves of colonization • First wave did not have a ‘civilizing’ mission • Second wave was about colonizing minds too • Alteration of cultural priorities; turned ‘modern West’ into a psychological category • The West not only created colonialism, it informs interpretations of it too • There’s a “proper” way to be anti-West that has been prescribed by the West • So even dissent remains controlled & predictable

  16. “Colonization of the Mind”by Ashis Nandy in Rahnmea & Bawtree (1994) The Post-Development Reader • Colonialism is a psychological state too • Shared codes: brings to centre subcultures previously marginalized in both cultures • Presumed style of dissent: psychological gains and losses often ignored in analyses • Cultural Co-optation & Consensus • Latent fear of rulers that there will be dissent • Identification of the ruled with the aggressor • Gandhi: dissented outside of the set style

  17. Chapters 7, 8 & 9in Heady (1996) Public Administration: A Comparative Perspective • Polarization within the developing world • South Korea vs. India; South Africa vs. Zaire • ‘Transitional’ countries perhaps better title • Development • Dual objectives of nation building and socio-economic progress • Internal and external factors become important depending on the emphasis

  18. Chapters 7, 8 & 9in Heady (1996) Public Administration: A Comparative Perspective • Politics of development in the third world • Political alienation • Political uncertainty and extra-legal change • Elitist leadership • Three trends • Move away from competitive party systems • Military intervention & control of govt. machinery • Contemporary tendency toward redemocratization

  19. Chapters 7, 8 & 9in Heady (1996) Public Administration: A Comparative Perspective • Common Administrative patterns • Imitative rather than indigenous • Deficient in skilled development manpower • Bureaucracy busy with non-program goals • Gap between what ought to be and what actually is masked • Differences in administration emanating from different regime types

  20. Chapters 7, 8 & 9in Heady (1996) Public Administration: A Comparative Perspective • Political regime variations in developing countries

  21. Chapter 3: Huntington & End of Modernization Theoryin Leys (1969) Politics and Change in Developing Countries • Puts forth key points of Huntington’s argument • Rejection of the concept of ‘political development’ • Discusses ‘political change’ • Strong current of dislike for the aspiration of masses and an admiration for an elite leadership • ‘As modernization occurs, more and more people become politically active; unless political institutions are capable of handling it, it will become destabilizing and/or lead to corruption’

  22. Chapter 3: Huntington & End of Modernization Theoryin Leys (1969) Politics and Change in Developing Countries • Critique: As social science • Formidable volume of data bedazzles but does not illuminate • Pseudo-quantification and circular argumentation • No testing of hypotheses; illustration only • Critique: As ideology • Relation between Huntington and Marxism influenced by his work with USAID • Not anti-communist; admiration for authoritarian regimes

  23. Esman (1991) Management Dimension of Development (Chapter 1 and Chapter 2) • Pragmatic consensus of development models - state/market/community • Increasing importance of the role of public development managers - intermediate band between macro economic management and microlevel entities - dealing with societal differentiation and bureaucratic pluralism

  24. Staudt (1991) Managing Development(Chapter 3) • Culture as the key for dev. management 1) national culture 2) ethnic/class culture 3) gender culture 4) organizational culture 5) disciplinary culture

  25. John Martinussen: Society, State & Market: A Guide To Competing Theories Of Development

  26. Thoughts of Masters • The Law of Dialectic Historical Change • Teleological/Religiously redemptive Assumption • More Political Economy Karl Marx Sharing Evolutionary Assumptions • Transit from Mechanical to Organic Society • Priority of Oder Maintenance • More Social/sociological Emile Durkheim Max Weber • Class/Power Struggle • Theory of Bureaucracy • Somewhat Political

  27. Classical Political Modernization Theory Major Theorists • Gabriel Almond: Etablishing categories of process • Lucien Pye: Cultural Dimension of Political Modernization • David Easton: System Theory-A feedback system based on Input/output Chain Key Points • Political Development Approach (Instead of Modernisation theory) • But very similar with economic & sociological Modernization theory. • Same Dualism between tradition and modern • Optimistic prospects of political modernization in the 3rd world due to the Western Critiques • Rare to find out real cases • Western bias of Market oriented social adjustment mechanism • Ignorance of considerable differences among the underdeveloped countries. • Only answer is to westernize entire society (political/education/legal/organization)

  28. Alternatives

  29. A. Dialectical Modernization Theory Major Theorists • Joseph Gusfield: Revitalization of tradition. • Lloyd I.Rudolph & Susanne H. Rudolph: The Politicization of the India Caste System. • Sandbrook & Hyden:Tradition of African Societies. Key Points • Retaining the dualism but different emphasis and meaning. • Some tradition even promotes political development through smooth transition. • Traditional societies may dynamic, heterogeneous and vigorous. • Emphasis more on dialectic relations between tradition and modern to diverse • passages of social changes.

  30. B. Political Order and State-Building Strategies Major Theorists • Samuel Huntington: Forerunner of later ‘Reaching-down state building theories. • Christopher Clapham: Against top-down approach/more civil society oriented. Key Points • Strong focus on political institutionalization and government capacity for • establishing order and consolidating the state-nations. • Simple transplantation from Western institution to developing states is not feasible. • Unmatched transformation process between economy and politics lead to • instability. • So diverse developing countries that different strategies should be applied. • The people as a partner should be accepted.

  31. C. Dependency Theories Major Theorists • Samir Amin: Imperialism & Unequal Development / Problems of Monopoly • Andre Gunder Frank: Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America. Key Points • The primary concern on the reason of economic underdevelopment in peripheral • societies. • Consequently, political subordination to external economic forces and its • embodiment. • Refutation of modernization breakthrough against dependency on the metropoles • (Frank) and centre formations (Amin) • Arguing delinking through socialism. Critiques • Similar Assumptions with modernization theory. • Economic reductionism while neglecting dynamic politico-historical and social processes in diverse peripheral societies • Exaggeration of autonomy of backward countries

  32. D. Consequences of Modernization Major Theorists • David Apter: Rethinking Development Key Points • Critiques against both modernization theory as too naïve/optimistic view of balanced transition and dependency theory as too optimistic of socialism effects. • Providing a new conceptual framework with concepts of development, innovation, marginalization and violence by shifting focus from state to the impact of modernization processes in a civil society context. • Arguing too widespread organized violence and the disposition to violence resulted from the tension between innovation and marginalization since innovation as a essence of industrial grown marginalize losing people who tend to be violent protestors to the change establishing a symbolic capital as a legitimate base against innovation led changes. •  David Apter argues about the social limits of growth and the rethinking of development.

  33. E. Historical Trajectories as a Radical Approach Major Theorists • Fernand Braudel: longue duree (Long Duration) • Perry Anderson: Historical Trajectory • Jean-Francois Bayart: 3 ways of analyzing modern states. Key Points • Critiques against previous development theories neglecting their diverse historical • (irreducible) trajectories. • Emphasis on irreducible long term historical trajectories. • serious disruptions occurred by Western colonization over Africa and Asia. • 3 ways of analyzing modern states for identifying commonalities and differences: • civilization, historicity and Cultural Construction Critiques • Representative research of current trends (cf. Manor,1991; Kaviraj, 1991) with a good trial to correct the mainstream errors. • Vagueness of concepts that hinder to make a general theory. • Limited validity of the generalizability of a specific historical interpretation of one society to other society.

  34. F. Political Regimes: Democracy vs Non-Democracy Explanatory Variables of Non-Democratic Regimes • The Colonial Legacy: Hamza Alavi • The military and civil bureaucracies • National and ethnic conflicts • Rural-urban contradiction: Most Powers in Urban (Michael Lipton) • International Conflicts: cold war era.(Viotti&Kauppi;Holm&Sorensen) • Non-democratic institutions and traditions: Africa- Richard Sandbgrook; Janson&Rosberg • Invented traditions.: Eric Hobsbawm and Rerence Ranger • Islamic Conceptions of the State: Rosenthal; Ferdinand & Mozaffari • Personal rule and patron-client relationships through informal links: Robert Jackson and Carl Rosberg; Richard Sandbrook; Goran Hyden

  35. F. Political Regimes: Democracy vs Non-Democracy Prospects for Democracy • Causes of Democratization tendency in the developing worlds • Incapacity of autocratic regimes over the rising demands of people and crisis. • De-legitimization of autocratic regimes: Eastern Europe (Sorenson,1983) • Historical Change: the end of cold war era • Education • Urbanization • Democracy and governability (Not always associated with each other) • The study of India democratic regime’s struggles by Atul Kohli (1991) • Democracy and Human Rights (Not Always associated with each other • India Cases versus Scandinavian states. Two Results from the Deviations • limited protection capacity for citizen rights that are determined by other factors • Severe distortions against minority and poor people.

  36. G. Social Class Theories • Key Points: Forms of state and regime to a large extent are determined by the interests of the social forces and their relative power positions. • Key influential thought lineage: Marxism in combination with Weberian tradition • Key Theorists: Nicos Poulantzas, 1973,78; Erik Olin Wright, 1978,85

  37. G. Social Class Theories : Class and State Theories Key Points • Focusing more on internal dynamics than external factors and influences. • Viewing the form of regime and its entity as product of class struggles and conflicts. • Social Class and its relative position as primary determinants since they seek to optimize or maximize their interest and influence through state apparatuses. Major Theories • Symbiosis between international capital and the national bourgeoisies as the mian determinant of regime from in Africa (Langdon and Godfrey, 1976). • The petty bourgeoisie as the ruling or the most influence class for the form of nature (Meillassoux,1970;Shivji,1976; Saul, 1974,79) • Limited/sporadic influence of social classes (Hyden, 1983) • More complex pictures from interactions between social structures and regimes in Latin America, Asia and the Middle East (Martinussen, 1980; Olsen, 1994)

  38. H. State Centered Development Key Points • State extension far reaching down/out to citizens via bureaucracy as an engine of growth/development and as a central planning/allocation mechanism. • Rare possibility to escape out of underdeveloped with no state intervention. • State as a rational actor to the benefit of society as a whole under the name of common good. Critiques from Neo-Classical Economy • State should be minimized due to poor performance/misallocation caused by self-seeking behavior/corruption. • Unwanted side effect like ineffective/inefficient cost-benefits. • Price distorting mechanism should be eliminated.

  39. I. Market Friendly Approaches Key Points • First formulations of the neo-classical paradigm: Autonomous market mechanism. • Criticism of Keyne’s conception of state intervention. • Primary Concepts: Free competition and Self-Regulating Market mechanism • Major international institutions: IMF, The World Bank and decision makers in OECD especially such as Reagan, Thatcher and Kohl. Major Theorists • Little, Scitovsky and Scott: CriticizingSelf-seeking behavior of state employees • Syendsen: Change of Guard • Toye; Lal; Bela BAlassa; Bhagwati, and Little: Calling Counter Revolution • Deepak Lal: Limits of Govt. Intervention • Jagdish Bhagwati and Desai: Direct Unproductive Profit Seeking [DUP]-Behavior Critiques • Problems from initiatives of financial institutions. • Focus shift from the right policies to the right prices • Too excessive criticism of state-managed development model • The irony of the World Bank

  40. J. Revisionist Approaches • Jean-Phillppe Platteau : Shaky market mechanism functioning only under two premises: Impersonal Relationships and Generalized Morality in Honesty. • Jerome Davis : Preconditions of effectively functioning market finance transferability, standardization of contracts, the existence of risk spreading organization • Neo-structural economists • 1) Salazar-Xirinach: Adding the social distribution of incomes and growth and • decision making process. • 2) Toye; Killick; Streeten: Take attention to available options to decision • makers in developing countries. Overall Critiques • Overlapped enterprise between private and public in reality beyond the dichotomy. • Market cannot function without regulation that state can afford.

  41. Different Views of East Asian Miracles • Neo-classical Views: Chen; Wolf - Special attention to Well functioning active government, reliable legal framework, political incentives for export-oriented development and active govt. led investment in education and health • Revisionist Views: Alice Amsden, 1989; Robert Wade, 1990 - In cases of Taiwan and South Korea- the role of ‘governed market’ • Functional Approach: The World Bank Economists, 1993 based on studies of Far Eastern Economies. - Functional mechanisms of state-managed development including human resource investment. Other Opinions • More People Friendly Approach: Paul Streeten • Political Feasibility of Economic Reforms: Anne O. Kreuger; Haggard and Kaufman -Without understanding and considering prevailing political power structure no Successful market oriented reforms are feasible.

  42. References • Berger, P.L. (1974). Pyramids of Sacrifice: Political Ethics and Social Change. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books. pp.1-113. • Esman, M. (1991). Management Dimensions of Development: Perspectives and Strategies. Harford: Kumarian Press. Chapters 1-2. • Heady, F. (1991). Public Administration: A Comparative Perspective. New York: Marcel Dekker. Chapters 7-9. • Hungtington, S.P. (1996). The Clash of Civilizations and the Making of World Order. New York: Simon and Shuster. Chapters 8-9. • Huntington, S.P. (1968). Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven: Yale University Press. Chapter 1. • Leys , C. (1996). The Rise and Fall of Development Theory. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. Chapters 3. • Martinussen, J. (1997). Society, State and Market: A Guide to Competing Theories of Development. London: Zed Press. Chapters 8 and 9. • Nandy, A. Colonization of the Mind. In Rahnema and Bawtree • Staudt, K. (1991). Managing Development: State, Society and International Contexts. Newbury Park: Sage. Chapters 12-14 and 18.

More Related