1 / 18

Health Services Research & Human Subjects Protection

Health Services Research & Human Subjects Protection. K. Lynn Cates, MD Assistant Chief Research & Development Officer Director, PRIDE Office of Research & Development Department of Veterans Affairs February 23, 2007. Human Research Has Changed. New opportunities Electronic age

benoit
Download Presentation

Health Services Research & Human Subjects Protection

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Health Services Research & Human Subjects Protection K. Lynn Cates, MD Assistant Chief Research & Development Officer Director, PRIDE Office of Research & Development Department of Veterans Affairs February 23, 2007

  2. Human Research Has Changed • New opportunities • Electronic age • Larger, more complex studies • Faster translation to clinical care • New risks • How can we meet your needs?

  3. Health Services Research & Human Subjects Protection - Perceptions • What we hear from HSR&D investigators about IRBs • Reviews are inconsistent • Too slow & inefficient – unnecessary delays • Too demanding • Requirements are not realistic • Demands compromise study design • Over-estimate risks

  4. Health Services Research & Human Subjects Protection - Perceptions • What we hear from IRBs about HSR&D investigators • Don’t understand when they need IRB approval or informed consent • Protocols don’t provide adequate information to assess human subjects issues • Under-estimate risk

  5. Ultimate Goals • Teamwork (e.g., PIs, ORD, ORO, ISOs, Privacy, Police/Security, unions, etc.) • Define the issues (not just perceptions) • Develop informed guidance for investigators, IRBs and others responsible for protecting subjects

  6. Meeting Challenges to HSR&D Investigators for Human Subjects Protection • VA Central IRB • Key issues • Defining risks (e.g., to privacy – de-identification) • When is it research vs. QI or program evaluation • Dealing with large, complex studies • Engagement - Which IRBs need to approve a multi-site study? • Data security & confidentiality • HSR&D investigator’s perspective

  7. VA Central IRBPurpose • Improve human research protection in VA-funded multi-site studies by ensuring • Appropriate ethical & scientific review • Local issues are addressed • Enhance efficiency of reviews

  8. VA Central IRBExamples of Research Projects • Health Services Research • Quality Improvement • Database Research • Nursing Research • Cooperative Studies • Genomics Research

  9. VA Central IRB Roll-out • VA-funded research only • First - Multi-site VA Health Services Research & Cooperative Studies • Later - Will consider the possibility of serving as IRB of record for small research programs

  10. VA Central IRBLogistics • No charge to VA facilities • Staffed by PRIDE in ORD • IRB members from all over the country • Monthly meetings • Evaluate performance

  11. VA Central IRBProcess • PI enlists sites • PI submits protocol to VA Central IRB including list of participating VA facilities • VA Central IRB performs review • Local VA facilities provide comments (e.g., local issues, state & local language) • VA Central IRB is final arbiter • Local VA facilities opt in

  12. VA Central IRBAdvantages • More consistent expert ethical & scientific review • Earlier identification of trends in adverse events • Improved veterans’ access to multi-center trials • Improved efficiency • Transparent, consistent process • Model for local IRBs

  13. Challenges for VA Central IRBLocal Accountability • Concept of “IRB” vs. “Human Research Protection Program” (HRPP) • Every facility that performs human research has ultimate responsibility for its HRPP, even if it uses another facility’s IRB or the VA Central IRB • Medical Center Director must designate someone (e.g., IRB, R&D Committee or an individual) to ensure accountability

  14. Local AccountabilityLocal Responsibilities • Providing local knowledge of • Research culture • Community culture & attitudes • State & local laws • Investigator oversight • Research misconduct/impropriety • Training & credentialing • Monitoring & auditing • Handling of adverse events

  15. Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) Between Local Facility & VA Central IRB • “Crisp” agreements with clear delineation of respective • Roles • Responsibilities • Authorities

  16. Challenges for VA Central IRBIt Will Not Solve Everyone’s Problems • Other approvals -R&D Committee, IACUC, biosafety, unions, OMB • Many current delays are caused by investigators’ not promptly providing all information needed for IRB review

  17. Preparing for the VA Central IRB • Site visits to NCI CIRB & independent IRBs • National IRB workshops on alternatives to current IRBs • Communications • NLB Health Systems Committee, ORO, Ethics, Nursing, Patient Care Services, Public Health, etc. • Field focus group • 4 regional Local Accountability meetings • VA IRB Chairs meeting • New staff: IRB Administrator & IRB Coordinator • Identify & train IRB members

  18. Contact Information lynn.cates@va.gov

More Related