340 likes | 470 Views
2. SNAP Telescope Structural / Thermal. Mechanical RequirementsTelescope Optical ElementsTelescope Packaging (TMA-63)Stray Light Baffle and CoverTelescope StructureTelescope MechanismsTelescope ThermalCamera (passive) ThermalR
E N D
1. 1 David Pankow
Space Sciences Laboratory,
Mechanical Engr. Department
University of California Berkeley
July 2002
SC-3 Telescope Structural/ThermalWBS 2.2
2. 2 SNAP Telescope Structural / Thermal
3. 3 SNAP DESIGN PHILOSOPHY
4. 4 Telescope Configuration from IMDC
5. 5 Current Telescope Evolution
6. 6 MECHANICAL REQUIREMENTS
7. 7 Corning ULE ultra-low expansion glass
Face sheets bonded to honeycomb core
Achieves 85-90% lightweight
Extensive manufacturing history
Meets our performance requirements
Schott Zerodur glass/ceramic material
Solid blank, weight relieved by milling backside
Achieves 70-85% lightweight
Extensive manufacturing history
Meets our performance requirements
Astrium/Boostec sintered SiC (distant 3rd choice)
Relatively new in astronomy; limited flight history
Appreciable CTE is a concern
Ongoing work in France and Germany; also JPL
8. 8
9. 9 Corning ULE
3 pieces: slump face sheets & core
Water-jet the thick core section
fuse them under compression
grind polish & inspect
figure; measure...
coat and acceptance test
Schott Zerodur
generate the curved front & back
weight relieve the back
grind polish & inspect
figure; measure...
coat and acceptance test
Boostec SiC
mix binder and press petals
machine and sinter petals
braze petals together
apply CVD surface layer
grind polish & inspect
figure; measure...
coat and acceptance test Corning ULE risks
availability
improper fusion
Schott Zerodur risks
Open backed mirror
Boostec risks
material homogenienity?
braze strength?
braze distortions?
figure stability in space environment?
how to deal with CTE?
10. 10 Key requirements and issues
Dimensional stability
High specific stiffness (1g sag, acoustic response)
Stresses during launch
Design of supports
Baseline technology
Multi-piece, fusion bonded, with egg-crate core
Meniscus shaped
Triangular core cells
11. 11 TELESCOPE OPTICS Transverse Rear Optics Selected TMA-56 (coaxial) vs. TMA-63 (lateral)
Key Requirements
Dimensional Stability
Stiffness and Gravity Deflection
Better Packing than Axial Tertiary
Overall Length is Reduced
Longer Stray Light Baffle is Possible
No Structural Obscurations
Metering Struts Possible (like secondary)
Rear Coffin Design is Attractive
Encloses Transverse Rear Optics
Accommodates Extensive Baffling
12. 12 Stray Light Baffle had Optics Requirements, only Modest Precision
Supported by Spacecraft, NOT TELESCOPE
Secondary Mirror Metering Structure Concepts
FEM Modal Resonances Explored for Promising Candidates
Tertiary Mirror Support Metering Structure
Transverse Coffin is Presently Baselined
Kinematic Support for All Optics
Normal or Inverted Bipods
13. 13
14. 14
15. 15
16. 16
17. 17 TELESCOPE STRUCTURE
18. 18 TELESCOPE STRUCTURE
19. 19 Optical Telescope Assembly (OTA)
20. 20 Mathematically, 13 Mechanical Adjustments are Possible
Focusing, Centering, and Collimation
6 DOF Hexapod is Attractive for Alignment of Secondary (qz is a spare)
Complete Tolerance & Alignment Budget is being Generated
Tertiary Mirror may also need to be motorized
Focusing & Alignment Procedure
How Complicated are the Commissioning, and later On-Orbit Alignments?
Least Squares Optimization and Monti-Carlo Approaches Show Promise
Alternate Methods Will be Explored in the R&D Phase
Shutter Concepts are being Examined
Flying Slit Concept is Quite Attractive
Butterfly Shutter, or Counter-Rotating Blades are Possible
Spacecraft Fit and Image Disturbance are Issues
Speed and Uniformity of Exposure Times over the Field
Light Path for the ACS Guider
Reliability is a Big Concern
21. 21 TELESCOPE MECHANISMS HEXAPOD FOCUS CONTROL
Needed on Secondary Mirror
micron steps & mm Range Needed
Tolerances by M.Lampton p.13-15
Several Designs have Flown
Not a Pioneering Design
22. 22 TELESCOPE MECHANISMS
23. 23 TELESCOPE THERMAL
24. 24 TELESCOPE THERMAL OPTICS: Build,Test, & Fly Warm like Hubble !
25. 25 OTA WARM OPTICS THERMAL BUDGET LARGE STRAY LIGHT BAFFLE (~180K)
478 w Absorbed Sunlight if MLI covered (a* ~ 2%)
100 w Telescope Internal Parasitics and 5m2 Solar Array coupling (MLI behind)
< 62w> Radiant Loss from Baffle Outer Cylinder (e * ~ 2%)
<480w> Radiant Loss from Baffle Open BB End (large axial Temp gradient)
PRIMARY MIRROR HEATER LOAD AT 280K
< 6w> Radiant Loss to Space (e ~ 2%)
<14w> Radiant Face Loss to 180K Baffle (e ~ 2%)
< 4w> Radiant MLI covered Edge Loss to 180K Baffle (e * ~ 1%)
< 1w> Radiant Loss from Central MLI Stovepipe BB hole
SECONDARY MIRROR HEATER LOAD AT 280K
<10w> Radiant and Conductive Losses to Baffle and Structure (Est.)
TBS HEATED SECONDARY STRUCTURE (black MLI covered)
Cool Optics means cool figuring and testing possible but a cost & schedule driver
Hubble budgeted 63w for heaters now may be higher
26. 26 OTA CAMERA THERMAL ROM PASSIVE GIGA-CAM 140K DEWAR THERMAL BUDGET
32 w Radiating Capacity from 2m2 unobstructed 130K Radiator to Space
< 4w> Radiator Thermal Isolation Mounts & MLI behind
RADIANT COUPLING LOSSES
< 6w> CONICAL Cosmic Ray Shield - MLI outside (e * ~ 1%)
< 4w> Open End CONE Blackbody Loss to warm Coffin Cavity
CONDUCTIVE COUPLING LOSSES
< 1w> Giga-Cam Thermal Isolation Mounts
< 2w> Dewar Thermal Isolation Mounts and Cold Plate Gaskets
< 1w> Electrical Flex-Print (~ 5800 traces)
< 8w> Average Electrical Power Dissipated in HgCdTe & CCDs
~ 6w CURRENT MARGIN (ROM)
~10C Gradient allocated for Cold Plate, Radiator, and Flex-Links
27. 27 OTA THERMAL Mariner 6&7 (Mars 69)
IR Spectrometer
Joule-Thompson Cryostat
Thermal Isolation Mount
28. 28 OTA THERMAL
29. 29 OTA THERMAL + SOLUTIONS FOR COMMON CONTAMINATION CONCERNS
Moisture or Frost is a Primary Culprit
FEP Teflon MLI Blanketing is a Stock Item (0.005% hygroscopic)
Cyanate Ester Resins Absorb ~7ppm Water vs ~70 ppm for Epoxies
Concentric Gold Plated Cans Tend to be Heavy & More Conductive
Structured Cool-down Approach
Focal Plane Camera will be the Last Item to Cool-Down in LEO
Residual Moisture can be Frozen into Structure & Blankets
Preferred Vent Paths & Cover Strategies are Frequently Used
30. 30 TELESCOPE RISK ASSESSMENT Mirror Fabrication and Testing
Far less demanding than HST: we are NIR, not NUV
Yet, we will need comprehensive test plans
Mechanical and Structural
Comprehensive Test Plans: Static, Dynamic, Thermal
Thermal and Mechanical Disturbances
Easy Thermal Environment in HEO, few eclipses
Schedule: Optic Elements are the Long Lead Item!
Error Budgets: Fixturing, Optical Test Equipment, etc
Do we need a full-aperture reference test flat?
Contamination Control: Material Choices & Test Plan
Stray Light Control: Management & Test Plan
31. 31 R&D ACTIVITIES Expand Instrument Project Office Infrastructure as needed to properly Architect the SNAP Mission
Typical Instrument Engineering Team
Instrument Manager, Structural, Thermal, Cryogenic, Mechanisms, Optics, Quality Assurance, Contamination, Configuration Management, Procurement
Develop the Proof of Concept Spacecraft & Instrument Designs
Detailed Camera and Dewar Mechanical, Thermal, and Electrical Designs
Partner with Industry(s) to develop Telescope and OTA Structure
Develop Compatible Primary, or the Load Bearing Spacecraft Structure
Conceptual Design of Test / Ground Support Equipment needs
32. 32 SYSTEMS ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT TOOLS & BUDGETING
TRADITIONAL
MASS
POWER
MISSION UNIQUES
INTEGRATED THERMAL MODEL
TEMPERATURES
HEAT FLUX
INTEGRATED STRUCTURAL MODEL
LINEAR MOMENTUM
ANGULAR MOMENTUM
RANDOM NOISE SPECTRA
STRAY LIGHT MODEL
PARTICULATE & VOLATILE CONTAMINANTS
BOTH STRAY & LEAKED LIGHT
R&D ACTIVITIES
33. 33 R&D ACTIVITY HIGHLGHTS Design Activity Flow Downs, or Design Related Activities
Preliminary Coupled Loads Analysis (includes Launcher)
Preliminary Observatory Level Integrated Thermal Model
Generate Viable Optics Test plan, plus the general I&T plans
Develop draft Instrument & Spacecraft Interface Documents
Science and Mission Requirements Review(s)
Optical Element Studies Commissioned with Promising Vendors
Generate the Long Lead Item Optics Procurement Plan
Generate EM Spacecraft & Telescope Structure Plan and Schedule
Staffing, Costs, and Schedule was presented by M. Lampton
34. 34 SUMMARY & COMMENTS Optics Fabrication Plan Retains Options for Program Flexibility
SNAP has several Options for Lightweight, Low CTE Mirrors
Stray Light Baffle may be a Conventional Construction
Composite Telescope Structures are well Understood and this Technology Continues to Advance
Build, Test, & Fly Warm is both Proven and Cost Effective
Passive Thermal Approach is Viable for Camera