1 / 13

PI Aging Simulation Model

PI Aging Simulation Model. J. Chris White, Twilighttraining.com Walter T. Schaffer, Ph.D. OER, OD, NIH June 4, 2008. RPG PI Stocks. Basic Structure for Age Group. New PIs (i.e., first-time) that enter the NIH pool in this age group.

berke
Download Presentation

PI Aging Simulation Model

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PI Aging Simulation Model J. Chris White, Twilighttraining.com Walter T. Schaffer, Ph.D. OER, OD, NIH June 4, 2008

  2. RPG PI Stocks

  3. Basic Structure for Age Group New PIs (i.e., first-time) that enter the NIH pool in this age group. Stock - Represents the number of PIs in the total pool that are in this age group. PIs in the system that have “aged” enough to move to the next age group. PIs in the system that have “aged” enough to move into this age group. PIs who experienced a gap in funding now returning into this age group. PIs of this age group that do not get funded the following year.

  4. Connecting Age Groups

  5. SimBLOX Methodology Simulation “agent” model SimBRIX “icon”

  6. SimBLOX Example SimBRIX Drag-and-drop SimBRIX to build larger model Input parameters for selected SimBRIX

  7. Simulation Results – FY1980

  8. Simulation Results – FY2005 RMS = 0.38%

  9. Avg Ages: FY80 = 39.0 FY85 = 41.1 FY90 = 43.7 FY95 = 45.8 FY00 = 47.8 FY05 = 49.5 FY10 = 50.9 FY15 = 52.1

  10. Conclusions and Next Steps • Simulation matches historical data with high fidelity over 25 years: • RMS = 0.38% for worst fit for FY • RMS = 0.011% for total PI’s for simulation • Incorporate external variables as necessary: • Ex: NIH annual budget, success rates • Add “feedback loops” into model structure: • Relationships among key variables and flow rates (e.g., as success rate increases, how do new or funded PI’s respond) • Relationship of influx to efflux in various budget climates • Develop Scenarios for more or fewer New Investigators on total PI Pool • Develop Scenarios to estimate effect of switching to Early Stage Investigators

  11. Add Entrance/Exit Feedback Loop: Balance Influx and Efflux New PIs (i.e., first-time) that enter the NIH pool in this age group. PIs who experienced a gap in funding now returning into this age group. PIs of this age group that do not get funded the following year.

  12. Bachrach, Christine (NIH/NICHD) Barr, Robin (NIH/NIA) Bartrum, John (NIH/OD) Berg, Jeremy (NIH/NIGMS) Boyle, Michael (NIH/OD) Braveman, Norman (NIH/NIDCR) Bronson, Charlette (NIH/NIA) Charles Sherman Clark, Rebecca (NIH/NICHD) DeLeo, James (NIH/CC/DCRI) Dumais, Charles (NIH/CSR) Glanzman, Dennis (NIH/NIMH) Glavin, Sarah (NIH/NIDCR) Khachaturian, Henry (NIH/OD) Lederhendler, Israel (NIH/OD) Lyster, Peter (NIH/NIGMS) McGarvey, Bill (NIH/OD) Moore, Robert F. (NIH/OD) Myers, Louise (NIH/OD) Norvell, John (NIH/NIGMS) O'Connor, Judit (NIH/OD) Onken, James (NIH/NIGMS) Preusch, Peter (NIH/NIGMS) Schaffer, Walter (NIH/OD) Schwartz, Joan (NIH/OD) Sutton, Jennifer (NIH/OD) Suzman, Richard (NIH/NIA) Thakur, Neil (NIH/OD) Members of Workgroup

More Related