280 likes | 568 Views
Chapter 11 Manufacturing: Regional Patterns and Problems. Introduction The Importance of Manufacturing Regional Patterns and Processes Manufacturing Regions of the U.S. Regional Industrial Development Problems U.S. Patterns of Manufacturing World Manufacturing Patterns
E N D
Chapter 11 Manufacturing: Regional Patterns and Problems • Introduction • The Importance of Manufacturing • Regional Patterns and Processes • Manufacturing Regions of the U.S. • Regional Industrial Development Problems • U.S. Patterns of Manufacturing • World Manufacturing Patterns • The Globalization of Production
The Importance of Manufacturing The shift to services: ? Does this mean manufacturing is no longer a key sector in regional economies? The rise of high-tech Role of R&D and High-Tech in regional growth Manufacturing’s rich regional linkages
So, while employment may have declined, real output continues to rise
Employment Trend - Technology Based Industries- Washington State 1974-2000 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 Other Technology Based Industries 100,000 50,000 Aerospace - 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000
Relationship Between Regional Growth Rates and Intensity of R&D WA Index of R&D Effort Correlation: -.282, sig. .045 Index of Employment Growth 1990-2000
Regional Patterns and Processes • Regional Cycle Theory – industrial districts • Youth, maturity, and old age • Youth: experimentation & rapid growth; market expansion, capital rushes in, competitive advantage • Maturity: the dominance of the district, development of branch plants, movement of expertise to other regions • Old age: cost advantages lost, new regions become cost-competitive, aging capital, eroding managerial capabilities & labor
Regional Patterns & Processes, Cont. • Manufacturing within the urban system • Large cities as magnets for manufacturing • Not mentioned: they are also centers of markets for market-oriented categories of industry (milk processing, bread baking, newspaper printing, ready-mix concrete) • Diffusion of Manufacturing • Driven by technological innovations, in market oriented industry, in resource-oriented industry
Manufacturing Regions of the United States • Figure 11.1: The American Manufacturing Belt (Rustbelt) • Bos-Wash: Megalopolis anchored by New York • Montreal-Toronto-Buffalo-Rochester • Pittsburg – Cleveland – Detroit • Chicago – Gary - Milwaukee • Minneapolis – St. Louis • Rise of the Sunbelt: Figure 11.2
Rise of Manufacturing Outside the Rustbelt • Fueled by: • Multinationals entering U.S. markets (e.g. Japanese automobile manufacturers • Advent of flexible production systems • Demise of Fordist production systems in some sectors • Development of just-in-time production systems
Evidence of long-term reductions in capital tied up in inventories due to better logistics in the product delivery system
The End of Fordism? The Flexibility Debate Are we not only entering a new long-wave, where IT is the driving force, but also a new long-wave in which the basic structure of productive relations is in massive shift? The Fordist paradigm - implicit in the oligoplistic model - but also linked to consumption and the regulation of society/consumption
A new regime of accumulation? (1) The emergence of clusters of small firms, including co-ops (2) Flexibility related to new machines (3) Labor’s new position - functional flexibility (multiskilling) - numeric flexibility - financial flexibility - more part-time, flex time, telecommuting (4) Changes in market place conditions - mass markets break down - rise of niche (craft) markets
Emergence of Flexible Specialization Fragmentation of the Fordist firm - vertical disintegration (shedding non-central functions; outsourcing) and Market fragmentation (niche) Adoption of new technologies, especially those dependent upon computers and telecommunications (CAD/CAM/FMS) Labor force adjustments functional flexibility (multiskilling) numeric flexibility (adjusting quantities by task) financial flexibility (wage rate adjustment) more part time, short-term, temporary work
Flexible specialization & new industrial spaces Piore & Sabel - The Second Industrial Divide - craft-based districts in Italy, Germany, Denmark Clusters of high tech industry - Silicon Valley; Route 128; Austin Wooden boats in Pt. Townsend WA; Log homes in Bitterroot Valley MT The movie industry Debates over aspects of the flexibility thesis
Flexible Specialization and Regional Industrial Agglomerations: The Case of the U.S. Motion Picture Industry by Michael Storper & Susan Christopherson Historically, an oligopoly of theaters studio production facilities actors/production specialists spatially clustered in Southern California Vertical disintegration: 1950’s - 1970’s, with consequences in the 1980’s
Productions by Organization Type Number of productions per year 151 190 207 243 222
Establishments in the Entertainment Industry 1968-1997 1997 8916 6343 15259 1997 data from U.S. County Business Patterns; in the 1987 revision of the SIC code motion pictures was combined into a single industry
The Decreasing Size Per Establishment Combined Motion Pictures and TV
Structural Trends Retention of core activities: TV & Major films & channels of distribution Forced divestiture of theater chains Development of generic specialists subcontracting with specific producers for a given film & narrow scope; linked to major studios; many part-time workers; “project orientation,” FLEXIBILITY Product diversification: TV, Video, Film Establishments clustered in California, while filming locations have dispersed
Manufacturing Regions of the United States, continued • Location of Corporate Headquarters (Figure 11.4 – Borchert) • Government Influence on Regional Manufacturing Patterns • Rise of the “Gunbelt” • Regional Development Programs to Alleviate Poverty (ARDC; EDA • State government programs • Current fad: cluster studies