1 / 7

OPSAWG 70th IETF Vancouver, BC, CA

Quality Measurement Requirements for Tunneling Protocols draft-kikuchi-tunnel-measure-req-02.txt draft-kikuchi-passive-measure-01.txt. OPSAWG 70th IETF Vancouver, BC, CA. Agenda. Should we discuss our I-Ds in OPSAWG?. Abstract. Two I-Ds Requirements to measurement of tunneling protocols

berne
Download Presentation

OPSAWG 70th IETF Vancouver, BC, CA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Quality Measurement Requirementsfor Tunneling Protocolsdraft-kikuchi-tunnel-measure-req-02.txtdraft-kikuchi-passive-measure-01.txt OPSAWG 70th IETF Vancouver, BC, CA KIKUCHI Yutaka, Kochi Univ. of Tech.

  2. Agenda • Should we discuss our I-Ds in OPSAWG? KIKUCHI Yutaka, Kochi Univ. of Tech.

  3. Abstract • Two I-Ds • Requirements to measurement of tunneling protocols • A solution of the requirements • A concrete metrics of passive measurement with packet headers • Focus on the OAM point of view • for tunnel operators • less overhead, less accuracy KIKUCHI Yutaka, Kochi Univ. of Tech.

  4. Past versions • -req-00.txt • OPS Area open meeting, 68th IETF in Prague • no OPSAWG yet • both concepts were in one I-D • -req-01.txt and -measure-00.txt • OPSAWG, 69th IETF in Chicago • Now we have • -req-02.txt and -measure-01.txt KIKUCHI Yutaka, Kochi Univ. of Tech.

  5. Should we discuss in here? • Yes • for discuss about the requirements I-D • No • for the concrete metrics I-D KIKUCHI Yutaka, Kochi Univ. of Tech.

  6. Alternatives for the metrics I-D • IPPM • does not fit into IPPM • Recharter? • PMOL • does not handle new work proposal in the initial charger • Wait for the second charter? KIKUCHI Yutaka, Kochi Univ. of Tech.

  7. Acknowledgements • Useful discussions in TEReCo 2.0 Research Project • TEReCo: Traffic Engineering for Regional Communities • Sponsored in part by MIC Japan • SCOPE 072309007 KIKUCHI Yutaka, Kochi Univ. of Tech.

More Related