450 likes | 712 Views
Achieving the Single Market: Beyond Connected Continent. J. Scott Marcus. Beyond Connected Continent. Introduction Broadband in the EU Coverage, adoption, usage Supply versus demand Is Europe behind? The Single Market and Connected Continent Connected Continent objectives
E N D
Achieving the Single Market:Beyond Connected Continent J. Scott Marcus
Beyond Connected Continent Introduction Broadband in the EU Coverage, adoption, usage Supply versus demand Is Europe behind? The Single Market and Connected Continent Connected Continent objectives Assessment of individual initiatives Looking forward
Introduction • How to Build a Ubiquitous EU Digital Society: European electronic communications policy and Single Market issues. • Entertainment x.0 to Boost Broadband Deployment: supply and of consumer demand of basic, fast and ultra-fast broadband. • Ubiquitous Developments of the Digital Single Market: commercial and e-government applications via Internet.
Objectives of the current Framework Article 8 of the 2002 Framework Directive includes objectives to promote: Competition Efficient investment Consumer protection Internal market for electronic communications Pan-European services Trans-European networks More support for some than others. Do any action lines, for instance, promote trans-European networks?
Potential benefits of the Single Market Service providers should be able to access end-users in all Member States. End-users should be able to use services from any Member State. End-users should be able to use their services when they travel to another Member State. Economic benefits: Enhance efficiency by maximising economies of scale, and eliminating artifical barriers to trade.
What are we seeking to enhance? Regulation of electronic communications harmonised or uniform at European level? Cross-border access to electronic services? Trans-European services? Pan-European networks? Consolidation between Member States? Consolidation within Member States?
Profitability depressed • By various measures, profitability for European ECNP is lower than for global counterparts. • Creates exposure. • Collateral damage (e.g. from Latin American competitive wars). Source: BCG (forthcoming) for WEF
Negative impact on investment Source: BCG (forthcoming) for WEF
How to measure success? NRAs tend to measure their success by: Continued decline of incumbent market share. Continued decline in telecoms prices. In 2003, when prices in most Member States were arguably well in excess of cost and embedded inefficiencies arguably high, reducing prices to end users was arguably necessary. Are further reductions welfare-enhancing? Societal welfare is the sum of consumer welfare and producer welfare. Welfare transfers do not in and of themselves enhance societal welfare – they only shift the benefits around. How low is low enough? Is there a law of diminishing returns? At what point has the process has run its course? Are we increasing static efficiency at the cost of dynamic efficiency?
Coverage of basic and fast fixed broadband Coverage of basic broadband is good, fast broadband less so. Gaps in rural coverage persist. Source: Point Topic, data as of end of 2012
Adoption of fixed broadband Coverage and adoption are not the same thing. Europe leads the world in basic broadband adoption. Source: OECD Broadband Portal
Global Internet traffic trends Source: Cisco VNI (2012), WIK calculations. Full report, page 16.
Average busy hour traffic per user Full report, page 20. Source: Cisco VNI 2011 data, WIK calculations.
Effective download speeds Based on OECD subscription data (June 2012) merged with Akamai’s actual speed data (2nd quarter, 2012).
Usage correlates weakly with speed Sources: Ookla/Speedtest netindex, Cisco VNI (2013), WIK calculations.
Impediments to adoption in Europe “As Internet access becomes widely available, those who choose not to have Internet access are presumably more likely to have made an active decision to not do so.” “Among households without an Internet connection, the top reason given for not having one is that all household members are disinterested in accessing the Internet (63%). … Cost, as an explanation, has decreased in importance, 7% of respondents with no connection reported that they are not sure exactly what the Internet is. …” Eurobarometer survey (2013)
Demand side measures Source: Parcu et al. (2011)
Supply versus demand Source: Parcus et al. (2011)
Broadband in the EU Overall, Europeans are receiving the service that they need at a price they are willing to pay. The speed of broadband access is an important enabler, but only one of many. Insufficient speed can inhibit usage; however, speed well in excess of demand appears to have only limited effect in promoting usage. Once adoption is sufficient, demand side measures may be more effective than a purely supply side approach (“pushing on a rope”?).
Connected Continent: Problem Definition • Commission’s Impact Assessment alleges root causes to challenges to Europe. • Inconsistent national authorisation schemes; • Lack of coordination in spectrum assignments; • Lack of pan-European network access inputs with consistent capabilities; • High prices for roaming and international calls, inconsistent consumer protection. • These may be causes, but not root causes.
Authorisation • Commission alleges inconsistent national practice impedes European market entry. • Authorisation per se is a minor issue, if that. • Current Directive already limits what Member States can require, and time frames for action. • WIK 2008 study of Regulation of VoIP for the Commission: authorisation per se not a problem. • Current interviews generally support this. • Proposed solution is unwise, needlessly complex, and disproportionate.
Authorisation The current Directive is reasonably effective. A standard form in standard languages in the Directive would achieve much the same effect. Recommendation Revise the Authorisation and Universal Service Directives to provide a standardised Notification Form, and to eliminate payments for small undertakings.
Harmonised access products • Virtual Unbundled Local Access (VULA): a local access substitute for copper local loop unbundling. • Wholesale broadband Access: an IP-based bitstream product at regional or national level. • Terminating segments of leased lines: high quality dedicated links offering symmetric high bandwidths. • Assured service quality (ASQ) product.
Harmonised access products Proposal is directionally appropriate, but does not distinguish business from residential; does not distinguish urgent from non-urgent. There are benefits in harmonising conditions for terminating segments of leased lines. Virtual unbundling (VULA): may be less urgent (primarily a residential service); not always appropriate (physical access preferable in some cases). What is ‘assured service quality’ (ASQ)? What problem does it seek to address?
Spectrum management • Important to prevent delays in the assignment of a second Digital Dividend in the 700 MHz band after WRC (2015). • Proposed solution rather heavy-handed? • The Commission should be empowered to establish common timetables for assignment and expiration of individual rights. Recommendation Achieve the key purposes of the Commission's spectrum management proposals by means of a Regulation.
Network neutrality • Risk that unwise acts at Member State level might interfere with the provision of services with an enhanced QoS. • Could potentially lead to a patchwork quilt of legal and regulatory impediments that could impede quality-of-service-aware offers, thus negatively impacting the Single Market and the broader economy. • Implementation is linked to consumer protection rules.
Roaming and international calls • Roaming alliances (Article 4a) • Must eventually cover all Member States • Prices comparable to domestic (?) • Freedom from retail price controls • Freedom from need to implement or support structural solutions • Reductions in roaming prices • No charge for voice calls received • International calls same as domestic for fixed; no more expensive than mobile roaming for mobile.
Roaming and international calls • The Commission’s proposed approach to roaming alliances is unlikely to be effective. • High transaction costs. • There is no incentive for mobile network operators to form such alliances. • Cost to implement Structural Solutions sunk. • Competition rendered ineffective anyway. • Meanwhile, the proposal substantially undermines the viability of the structural solutions to roaming enacted in 2012.
Roaming and international calls Source: ARCEP, The Market for International Roaming, February 2006
Roaming and international calls Source: ARCEP, The Market for International Roaming, February 2006
Roaming and international calls • A strength of the current Roaming Regulation is that retail price and wholesale costs are controlled consistently. • To achieve the desired price levels, the MTR is probably too large a cost to ignore. • For calls received, the MTR received versus that paid to the Visited Network are decisive for profitability of the Home Network.
Roaming and international calls Source: DAE Scorecard, financial fixed and mobile spreadsheet
Connected ContinentRegulation RoamingRegulation Retail Prices International Calls Roaming Costs Termination Rates Recommendationon terminationrates Access and InterconnectionDirective Roaming and international calls
Roaming and international calls The Commission’s proposal delays progress on lowering roaming prices. Diverts Commission, BEREC and NRA attention from useful pursuits. • Recommendation • Consider an integrated approach to capping • retail and wholesale roaming rates, • intra-EU call charges, and • termination rates.
Coherence: current vs new Framework The current framework is neat and hierarchical. The proposed structure would seriously impact simplicity, comprehensibility, and maintainability.
Coherence: proposed structure If the package is pared down, this risk is reduced.
Overall Assessment • Radical simplification is needed. • Useful elements of the Connected Continent should be enacted, subject to suitable amendments. • Recommendation • Implement priority measures through Regulation(s). • Conduct a review on roaming/calls measures. • Address remaining issues through a root and branch review of European policy for electronic communications.
What role for consolidation? Consolidation is inevitably a part of the discussion of achieving pan-European networks and trans-European services. It is necessary to strike the right balance between static versus dynamic efficiency. This raises difficult questions: What benefits flow from trans-European networks? Are policy measures needed to promote trans-European networks, and if so, what are they? What is the target profitability of network operators? What are the implications for single Member State mergers?
Looking forward Overall, Europe is doing reasonably well. Nonetheless, substantial further progress is needed in achieving the Single Market for electronic communications. Connected Continent deals with a very limited subset of the true problem, using a limited set of Action Lines. A considerable body of work will need to be addressed by the European institutions subsequent to the next elections.