1 / 38

Impedance of Y-Chamber for SPS Crab cavity

Impedance of Y-Chamber for SPS Crab cavity. By Phoevos Kardasopoulos Thanks to Benoit Salvant , Pei Zhang, Fred Galleazzi, Roberto Torres-Sanchez and Alick MacPherson Impedance Meeting Date: 14/04/14. Contents. Overview Methodology Review Existing Y-Chamber (COLDEX)

bess
Download Presentation

Impedance of Y-Chamber for SPS Crab cavity

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Impedance of Y-Chamber for SPS Crab cavity By Phoevos Kardasopoulos Thanks to Benoit Salvant, Pei Zhang, Fred Galleazzi, Roberto Torres-Sanchez and Alick MacPherson Impedance Meeting Date: 14/04/14

  2. Contents • Overview • Methodology • Review Existing Y-Chamber (COLDEX) • Evaluation of Designs for Crab Cavities • Presentation of recommended impedance design • Issues Related to Bellows • Conclusions Objective of this talk: Present revised Y-chamber design for SPS crab cavity installation and seek approval from impedance group, so that the design can proceed to fabrication by the vacuum group.

  3. Contents • Overview • Methodology • Review Existing Y-Chamber (COLDEX) • Evaluation of Designs for Crab Cavities • Presentation of recommended impedance design • Issues Related to Bellows • Conclusions

  4. Overview • Y-Chamber’s purpose to switch objects in and out of the beam line.

  5. Overview • Y-Chamber’s purpose to switch objects in and out of the beam line.

  6. Overview • Current Y-Chamber: • Used by COLDEX. • Opening angle: 12 degrees. • Transverse displacement: 340mm. • Crab Cavities: • Opening angle: 16 degrees. • Transverse displacement: 510mm. • Expected number of cycles(in and out) = O(1000). • Redesign needed: • Mechanical redesign needed to accommodate Crab Cavities. • Take opportunity to redesign Y-Chamber to reduce impedance. • Mechanical design must have required reliability.

  7. Previous Research • Previous research has been conducted: • B. Spataroet al • Impedance of the LHC recombination chambers. LHC Project Note 254. 03/05/2001 • On trapped modes in the LHC recombination chambers: experimental results. LHC Project Note 254. LHC Project Note 266. 14/08/2001 • LHC Recombination chamber. • Possibility of trapped modes above the cut off frequency.

  8. Contents • Overview • Methodology • Review Existing Y-Chamber (COLDEX) • Evaluation of Designs for Crab Cavities • Presentation of recommended impedance design • Issues Related to Bellows • Conclusions

  9. Methodology • Initial 12o Y-chamber model received from Benoit. • CST used to perform simulations on the models. • Selection criteria: Based on CST simulations • High frequency : Frequency domain Eigenmode solver. • Low frequency: Time domain Wakefield solver • Results for new designs compared to baseline results of initial Y-chamber model.

  10. Methodology – High Frequency • Look at high frequency modes excited by the beam. • Evaluate shunt impedances. • Eigenmode solver. • Shunt impedances – CST post processing • Circular convention 2. • Evaluate impedance of transverse modes • Panofsky-Wenzel theorem – Only true for symmetric structures. • d = transverse displacement of integration path in cavity axis • Integration path offset by: d = ±5mm, ± 7mm, and ± 10mm. • MATLAB script to fit a parabolic shape, and take the coefficient of the linear term.

  11. Methodology – Low Frequency • Use time domain solver and look at imaginary part of impedance for different source-wake bunch configurations • Separate simulations for the monopole, dipole, and quadrupole. Source bunch wake bunch (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) 1)Monopole - Beam and test beam on the beam axis 2)Horizontal Dipolar - Beam offset from the beam axis in x 3)Horizontal Quadrupolar - Test beam offset from the beam axis in x 4)Vertical Dipolar - Beam offset from the beam axis in y 5)Vertical Quadrupolar - Test beam offset from the beam axis in y

  12. Methodology – Low Frequency • Effective longitudinal impedance: • n= f/frev • Effective transverse impedance: • Transverse impedance needs to be weighted by : • =0.65

  13. Contents • Overview • Methodology • Review Existing Y-Chamber (COLDEX) • Evaluation of Designs for Crab Cavities • Presentation of recommended impedance design • Issues Related to Bellows • Conclusions

  14. Current Y-Chamber • 12 degree version currently installed at COLDEX at SPS LSS4 • There are 3 of these currently in the SPS. • Two at LSS4, COLDEX(Crab Cavity) testing area. • Legacy design: Reasons behind design are unclear.

  15. Current Y-Chamber Two Models: . Baseline model. As-Installed Stainless Steel Boundaries All Beam pipe connection inner diameter = 155 mm

  16. Current Y-Chamber Two Models: Baseline model. As-Installed Stainless Steel Boundaries All Beam pipe connection inner diameter = 155 mm

  17. Eigenmode Results – Simple Y-Chamber Cut off frequency at 1.48 GHz Waveguide theory, Pipe radius 77.5mm Results from Eigenmode Simulations 1 Transverse mode identified 48 kOhms/m at 1.40 GHz

  18. Wakefield Solver - Simple Y-Chamber Results from Eigenmode Simulations

  19. Low Frequency Transverse Bunch length = 300 Charge =1e-9 Wakelength = 20000 Direct Testbeams CST Convention: Inductive impedance is -ve (d=5mm) 0.5 kOhms/m

  20. Low Frequency Transverse Bunch length = 300 Charge =1e-9 Wakelength = 20000 Direct Testbeams = 0.48 kOhms/m

  21. Low Frequency Longitudinal Y-Chamber ≈ 2.8 ± 0.2 mOhms

  22. 12 Degree Model Comparison

  23. 12 Degree Model Comparison SPS ≈ 20 MOhms/m

  24. 12 Degree Model Comparison SPS: Total Longitudinal 5 Ohms Total Transverse 20MOhms/m

  25. Contents • Overview • Methodology • Review Existing Y-Chamber (COLDEX) • Evaluation of Designs for Crab Cavities • Presentation of recommended impedance design • Issues Related to Bellows • Conclusions

  26. Alternate Designs Analysed All Designs: 16 Degree angle, stainless steel boundaries, 155mm pipe diameter • Scaled up with undulations. • Scaled up of 12 degree. • Provided by F. Galleazzi. • Ellipsoid Conical. • Proposed.

  27. High Frequency Longitudinal Impedance

  28. High Frequency Longitudinal Impedance

  29. High Frequency Transverse Impedance Proposed Design - No significant transverse modes why?

  30. Low Frequency Impedance Comparisons SPS: 5 Ohms Longitudinal 20MOhms Transverse

  31. Candidate Design Question: Is this design acceptable for the impedance working group? Question: What other aspects are important, aperture? Question: Can we proceed to develop mechanical design with vacuum group?

  32. Contents • Overview • Methodology • Review Existing Y-Chamber (COLDEX) • Evaluation of Designs for Crab Cavities • Presentation of recommended impedance design • Issues Related to Bellows • Conclusions

  33. Bellows Are there issues with the bellows? Suggested by Cedric Garion TE-VSC-DLM

  34. Bellow Impedance • Analytical Mode l- At high energy (http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/118026/files/p1.pdf) (Valid up to first cut off frequency) Effective Impedance ≈0.65 mOhms

  35. Bellow Impedance Cut off frequency at 1.47 GHz Waveguide theory, Pipe radius 78mm Should we be worried at we approach cut-off Effective Impedance ≈0.65 mOhms

  36. Bellow Impedance • Transverse Impedance: • (Handbook of Accelerator Physics and Engineering, pg. 258, A. Wu. Choa) • 3.12 mOhms/m

  37. Contents • Overview • Methodology • Review Existing Y-Chamber (COLDEX) • Evaluation of Designs for Crab Cavities • Presentation of recommended impedance design • Issues Related to Bellows • Conclusions

  38. Conclusions • Current 12 degree Y-Chamber has been modelled in CST. • Impedances have been calculatedcross checked with previous calc.. • Consistency cross check between time and frequency domain. • Crab cavity Y-Chambers designs • 4 models have been modelled & impedances calculated. • Results • Scaled up version of current Y-Chamber has increased impedance. • Reducing the volume reduces the impedance. • Candidate design: • Shunt impedance: • lowest significant: 3.92 kOhms @ 1.12 GHz • Most significant:: 5.25 kOhms @ 1.39 GHz • No transverse mode below cut off • Contribution from bellows: TE-VSC Design has negligible Impedance • Next step: Can impedance working group endorse Y-Chamber design for next step.

More Related