710 likes | 1.52k Views
Hydraulic Fracturing Short Course, Texas A&M University College Station 2005 Modeling, Monitoring, Post-Job Evaluation, Improvements. 3D. P3D and 3D Models. FracPro (RES, Pinnacle Technologies) FracCADE (Dowell) Stimwin (Halliburton) and PredK (Stim-Lab) TerraFrac StimPlan MFrac.
E N D
Hydraulic Fracturing Short Course, Texas A&M University College Station 2005 Modeling, Monitoring, Post-Job Evaluation, Improvements
P3D and 3D Models • FracPro (RES, Pinnacle Technologies) • FracCADE (Dowell) • Stimwin (Halliburton) and PredK (Stim-Lab) • TerraFrac • StimPlan • MFrac
Dimensionless Form of Nordgren Model tD(xfD) : inverse of xfD(tD) xD = 0 (wellbore) xD = xfD (tip)
Propagation Criterion of the Nordgren Model • Net pressure zero at tip • Once the fluid reaches the location, it opens up immediately • Propagation rate is determined by “how fast the fluid can flow
Other Propagation Criteria • (Apparent) Fracture Toughness • Dilatancy • Statistical Fracture mechanics • Continuum Damage mechanics
KIC KI hf pn xf (Rf) Fracture Toughness Criterion Stress Intensity Factor KI =pnxf1/2
CDM What is the time needed for D to start at D = 0 and grow to D = 1 ?
CDM Propagation Criterion Combined Kachanov parameter:
P3D • Pseudo 3 D Models: Extension of Nordgren’s differential model with height growth • Height criterion • Equilibrium height theory • or Assymptotic approach to equilibrium • Plus some “tip” effect
y wellbore element tip element x 3D (Finite Element Modeling)
KIC pn Fracture Toughness Criterion • Fluid flow in 2 D • Fluid loss according to local opening time • Propagation: Jumps • Stress Intensity Factor KI > KIC ?
Data Need for both P3D and 3D: • Layer data • Permeability, porosity, pressure • Young’s modulus, Poisson ratio, Fracture toughness • Minimum stress • Fluid data • Proppant data • Leakoff calculated from fluid and layer data
Design Tuning Steps • Step Rate test • Minifrac (Datafrac, Calibration Test) • Run design with obtained min (if needed) and leakoff coefficient • Adjust pad • Adjust proppant schedule
Step rate test Bottomhole pressure Injection rate Time
Propagation pressure Bottomhole pressure Two straight lines Injection rate Step rate test
6 Fall-off (minifrac) 3 ISIP 4 Closure 5 Reopening 6 Forced closure 7 Pseudo steady state 8 Rebound 1 5 2 3 4 8 Injection rate Bottomhole pressure Injection rate 2nD injection cycle 1st injection cycle 7 shut-in flow-back Time
g-function dimensionless shut-in time area-growth exponent where F[a, b; c; z] is the Hypergeometric function, available in the form of tables and computing algorithms
Pressure fall-off Fracture stiffness
g Shlyapobersky assumption • No spurt-loss bN mN Ae from intercept pw g=0
a=4/5 a=2/3 a=8/9 PKN KGD Radial p p x h 8 R Leakoff ( ) ( ) ( ) f f f - - - m m m coefficient, N N N p 3 t E ' 4 t E ' 2 t E ' e e e C L ¢ ¢ 2 E V ¢ Fracture 3 E V E V = i x = = 3 i x i R ( ) ( ) ( ) Extent f p - f 2 p - f h b p - h b p 8 b p f N C f N C N C V V V Fracture = - = - = - i w i i w w p Width e e e x h x h 2 R f f f f f 2 - - 2 . 830 C t 2 . 956 C t L e L e - 2 . 754 C t L e p w x h w x h Fluid 2 e f f e f f w R h = h = Efficiency e f e e 2 V V h = i i e V i Vi: injected into one wing Nolte-Shlyapobersky
1: g-function plot of pressure 2: get parameters bN and mN 3 Calculate Rf (fracture extent -radius) 4 Calculate CLAPP (apparent leakoff coeff) 5 Calculate wL (leakoff width) 6 Calculate we (end-of pumping width) 7 Calculate h (fluid efficiency)
Example Permeable (leakoff) thickness, ft, 42 Plane strain modulus, E' (psi), 2.0E+6 Closure Pressure, psi, 5850
Redesign • Run the design with new leakoff coefficient (That is why we do minifrac analysis)
Monitoring • Calculate proppant concentration at bottom (shift) • Calculate bottomhole injection pressure, net pressure • Calculate proppant in formation, proppant in well • Later: Add and synchronize gauge pressure
Nolte-Smith plot Wellbore screenout Log net pressure Tip screenout Normal frac propagation Unconfined height growth Log injection time
Post-Job Logging • Tracer Log • Temperature Log • Production Log
Available Techniques for Width and Height • Measured Directly • Formation Micro Scanner • Borehole Televiewer • Based on Inference • Temperature Logging • Isotopes (fluid, proppant) • Seismic Methods, Noise Logging • Tiltmeter techniques • Spinner survey Radius of penetration
Tiltmeter Results after Economides at al. Petroleum Well Construction
0.25 5000 0.20 4000 0.15 3000 Propped Width - in Conductivity (Kfw) - md.ft 0.10 2000 0.05 1000 0 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 Fracture Half-Length - ft 3D Simulation Texaco E&P FracCADE OCS-G 10752 #D-12 Actual 05-23-1997 Flow Capacity Profiles Propped Width (ACL) Conductivity - Kfw *Mark of Schlumberger
Design Improvement in a Field Program • Sizing • Pad volume for “generic” design • More aggressive or defensive proppant schedule • Proppant change (resin coated, high strength etc.) • Fluid system modification (crosslinked, foam) • Proppant carrying capacity • Leakoff • Perforation strategy changes • Forced closure, Resin coating, Fiber reinforcement, Deformable particle
Example: Tortuous Flow Path • Analysis of the injection rate dependent element of the treating pressure • Does proppant slug help? • Does limited entry help? • Does oriented perforation help? • Extreme: reconsidering well orientation: e.g. S shaped
smax smax Fracture Orientation: Perforation Strategy after Dees J M, SPE 30342 From overbalanced perforation From underbalanced perforation
Case Study: Effect of Non-Darcy Flow • Forcheimer Equation • Cornell & Katz
Non-Darcy Flow • Dimensionless Proppant Number is the most important parameter in UFD Effective Proppant Pack Permeability
Non-Darcy Flow • Effective Permeability keff is determined through an iterative process Drawdown is needed to calculate velocity • Reynolds Number
Non-Darcy Flow Coefficient (b) • Several equations have been developed mostly from lab measurements (empirical equations) • General form of b equation where b is 1/m and k is md