210 likes | 323 Views
Searching for Jesus. NT 301: Introduction to the New Testament New Brunswick Theological Seminary Virginia Wiles. Who Is Jesus?. Films. Who Do You Say that I Am?. How Do We Know?. Using the Sources New Testament: Gospels and Paul Early Church Fathers
E N D
Searching for Jesus NT 301: Introduction to the New Testament New Brunswick Theological Seminary Virginia Wiles
How Do We Know? • Using the Sources • New Testament: Gospels and Paul • Early Church Fathers • Non-Christian contemporary literature • Using our Minds • The Importance of Methodology
The Rise of Historical Consciousness • Cause and Effect • Historical distance WhowasJesus? Thus, the question arises…
How does who Jesus WAS compare withWho Jesus IS? The Jesus of History and The Christ of Faith
The Effects of the Enlightenment • John Locke (1632-1704) • Natural Law & Miracles • The Reasonableness of Christianity as Delivered in the Scriptures (anon, 1695) • “properly understood, the Scriptures contain nothing that was in conflict with reason” • Herman Samuel Reimarus (1695-1768) • published posthumously • absolute distinction between what Jesus said and did and what the Evangelists reported him to have said and done.
On Reimarus -- “It is not overstating the case to claim that all historical study of Jesus is a critical appropriation of this view or a debate with it.”--Leander Keck
Liberal Reconstructions of Jesus • Holtzmann (1832-1910) • Markan priority • Thus, Mark is most “authentic” • Adolf von Harnack (1851-1930) • Das Wesen des Christentum
The “Liberal View”: (Harnack) • Inward rule of God • Infinite worth of human soul • Higher righteousness and the command of love
Attacks on the Liberal Reconstructions Albert Schweitzer (1875-1965) The Quest for the Historical Jesus (1899) showed that the reconstructed Jesus was a retrojection of the scholar’s own paradigm Apocalypticism
After Schweitzer -- • Martin Kähler: • the Jesus of History vs. the Christ of Faith • Rudolph Bultmann (1884-197?) • How did the Proclaimer become the Proclaimed?
A Summary of the First Quest --The Historical Jesus... • Viewed as incompatible with Christianity (Reimarus) • Viewed as bulwark of true religion (Harnack) • Viewed as incompatible with MODERN sensibilities (Schweitzer) • Brings to expression an understanding of human existence (Bultmann)
The New Quest • Ernst Käsemann • Bultmann’s student • Criterion of Dissimilarity -- when there are no grounds either for deriving a tradition from Judaism or for ascribing it to primitive Christianity
Critique of Dissimilarity • Inevitably separates Jesus from both ancient Judaism and early Christianity • Criterion too ill-defined, leaving far too much scope for influence from the quester’s own prejudice
A “Third Quest” • Close study of Judaism • Geza Vermes, Jesus the Jew (1973) • E. P. Sanders, Jesus and Judaism (1975) • Defined by N.T. Wright (1986) • Jewish Jesus • Proper attitude to primary sources • Importance of eschatology • Understanding the historical causes of crucifixion
The Third Quest Jesus must be understood as a comprehensible and yet, so to speak, crucifiable first-century Jew, whatever the theological or hermeneutical consequences. -- N.T. Wright
The Jesus Seminar • Concerned to determine “what Jesus actually said and did” • Major players include -- • John Dominic Crossan • Marcus Borg • Not limited to canonical gospels • **Gospel of Thomas**