290 likes | 465 Views
A four decade record of elevation change of the Amery Ice Shelf, East Antarctica . 1 Matt King , 2,3,4 Richard Coleman, 5 Helen Amanda Fricker, 2,3,4 Ben Galton-Fenzi, 6 Benoit Legresy, 7 Laurie Padman, 2,4,8 Roland Warner
E N D
A four decade record of elevation change of the Amery Ice Shelf, East Antarctica 1Matt King, 2,3,4Richard Coleman, 5Helen Amanda Fricker, 2,3,4Ben Galton-Fenzi, 6Benoit Legresy,7Laurie Padman, 2,4,8Roland Warner 1Newcastle University, UK; 2University of Tasmania, Australia; 3CSIRO, Australia; 4ACE CRC, Australia;5Scripps Institution of Oceanography, USA; 6CNRS-CNES, France; 7Earth and Space Research, USA; 8Australian Antarctic Division, Australia Acknowledgements:Max Corry, Jo Jacka, Bill Budd, Andrew Ruddell
Early work • Seminal work of Budd et al. [1982] based on 1968-69 survey & glaciological data • Angles, distances, astronomical observations • Levelling • Accumulation • Ice core • One of the first large-scale surveys of an Antarctic Ice Shelf
Early work • Seminal work of Budd et al. [1982] based on 1968-69 survey & glaciological data • Angles, distances, astronomical observations • Levelling • Accumulation • Ice core • One of the first large-scale surveys of an Antarctic Ice Shelf
Since then… • Major calving event in ~1963 • Progressive growth since • Multi-decadal forcing • Potential climate effects • No data on ocean temperature change • Atmospheric temperature change small-to-negligible • Upstream sub-glacial lakes (Lambert Glacier) • Is there any observable ice shelf response? Monaghan et al. [2006]
AIS elevation change • Zwally et al. [2005] ERS-1/2 results show net elevation increase of AIS 1992-2001 • Infers net thickening 1992-2001 • Does this same trend continue over longer timescales? • Longer period reduces impact of intra-decadal spatio-temporal accumulation variations • Also, what change, if any, is seen in the velocity field?
Velocity data • Terrestrial data • Traversing on a moving conveyor belt over 500km • Angles (Wild T3), distances (Tellurometer MRA3) and star observations • Two closed traverses measured between April 1968 and Feb. 1970 • Analysis using “reduction to epoch” method • Large (>2.5km, ~43’) and unidentified misclose in previous traverse analysis
Velocity data • Reanalysis • Identify and correct errors causing misclose in Budd et al. [1982] analysis using raw field notes/computer output • Difficult due to the weakly constrained traverse • Multiple angle errors were identified • Addition of data previously not used (star observations for azimuth, extra ties to fixed locations) • Re-analysed the observations using least squares
New velocity results • Miscloseless than 5m or 11” (500km of traversing) • May still be some undetectable gross errors • Average velocity uncertainties (1 sigma) 1.4m/yr and 0.3 • Variations from previous analysis • Up to 4km in position (bore hole position varies by ~3km) • Up to 110m/yr and 38, but median differences ~5m/yr and 0.8 • Conclusions of Budd et al. [1982] still supported King, M. A., R. Coleman, P. J. Morgan, and R. S. Hurd (2007), Velocity change of the Amery Ice Shelf, East Antarctica, during the period 1968-1999, J. Geophys. Res., 112, F01013, doi:01010.01029/02006JF000609.
Comparison to ~1997 “InSAR” velocities Centreline differences (terrestrial minus RADARSAT) • Systematic biases evident between terrestrial and RADARSAT-derived velocities of Young and Hyland [2002] • Similar magnitude but different pattern in Joughin [2002] • Differences on grounded ice 1-3m/yr, suggesting tides + “inverse barometer” source • Also geo-location issues? • Real change possible? Magnitude (m/yr) Direction (°)
GPS velocities • GPS velocities from data 1991-1999 • In good agreement with terrestrial velocities • Suggests RADARSAT results are biased in this region by up to ±20-30m/yr • Suggests possible slow-down of 0.6%, 1968-1999
Levelling Data(1968-69) • 500km of geodetic levelling in 1968-69 • From 1968-69 ice front south for ~250km, 2 lateral lines • Raw field notes re-analysed • Propagated errors <0.2m • Datum • Connection to instantaneous sea level NE Amery • Levelling lat/lonbased on traverse locations
Levelling Data(1968-69) • 500km of geodetic levelling in 1968-69 • From 1968-69 ice front south for ~250km, 2 lateral lines • Raw field notes re-analysed • Propagated errors <0.2m • Datum • Connection to instantaneous sea level NE Amery • Levelling lat/lon based on traverse locations Sea level connection
GPS data(1995-2006) • Data • Profiles collected in 1995, 1998-99, 1999-2000, 2003 and 2005-6 • Some profiles attempted to follow the levelling lines • Processing stream • Profiles relative to local ice shelf base station in Track software • Base station motion (tidal etc) determined using kinematic positioning in GIPSY software (kinematic precise point positioning mode) • Apply model for tides and Inverse Barometer Effect (IBE)
ICESat data(2003-7) • October 2003 to April 2007 from ICESat campaigns: Laser 2a, 2b, 3b, 3c, 3d, 3e, 3f, 3g, and 3h • Release 428 • Low gain saturation correction applied • Converted to WGS84 ellipsoid • Re-tided, then more accurate tide models and IBE corrections applied
ERS-1&2 data(1992-2003) • Data • from http://icesat4.gsfc.nasa.gov/index.html, as Level 2 data records (version 5) • NASA/GSFC V5 range-retrackingalgorithm, etc. • 35-day repeat data in ice and ocean mode • Re-tided, then more accurate tide models and IBE corrections applied
Datum connections • Elevation from levelling (H) and GPS/ICESat (h) is not the same • Corrections • h= H+ N – T – IB - MDT • Geoid (N) ~15m (GRACE geoid: EIGEN-GL04C) • Tides (T) ~1-2m (TPXO6.2) • Inverse Barometer Effect (IB) <=0.4m • Mean Dynamic Ocean Topography (MDT) ~-1.5m (altimetry minus geoid) • Further correction for MSL change (~0.002m/yr) not applied Ice shelf Instantaneous T+IB Mean MDT N (Geoid-Ellipsoid) Geoid Ellipsoid
Crossovers • 84 GPS-levelingcrossovers (27-38 years) • 119 ICESat-levelingcrossovers (35-39 years)
Crossover dh/dt • ICESat-levelling crossovers normally distributed, close to 0 m/yr • GPS-levelling crossovers not normally distributed • smaller-scale features playing a more dominant role? ICESat-levelling GPS-levelling
Multi-decadal picture is close to zero change Mean dh/dt values -0.003 m/yr for GPS-levelling +0.013 m/yr for ICESat-levelling Timeline of change
Elevation fluctuations over shorter periods Agreements between techniques Timeline of change Net thickening Infer small net thinning ~1968-1996.5
Elevation fluctuations (ICESat) Ice Shelf Grounded Ice
Elevation fluctuations (ERS) Grounded Ice Grounded Ice Ice Shelf Ice Shelf Grounded Ice Ice Shelf
Origins of post-1996.6 change • What is the role of surface densification variations? ? Surface lowering Mean Jan Temp Surface raising ? Amery Ice Shelf proxy and observed January temperature data(Courtesy Ian Allison)
Liu et al [2006] Passive Microwave Melt Extents Tedesco [2009]
Origins of post-1996.6 change • Ocean/ice shelf modelling suggests • A 0.5 degCthermal forcing in the surface ocean gives a ~0.3 m/year increase in the melt rate at AM03 • This corresponds to a temperature change in the layer adjacent to the ice base of 0.08 degC • Surface ocean temperatures changes of 0.5 degCpossible • Could the oceans play a part? Location in northern Amery
Conclusions (Amery) • Elevation of northern Amery Ice Shelf is unchanged over period 1968-present • Variations of up to ~±0.2m/yr over periods up to ~1 decade; high spatial variability • Net thickening ~1992-2003 (agreement with altimetry) • Net thinning ~1968-1992; 2003-present • Signals may originate in densification variation but oceans could contribute • Velocity over 1968-1999 has slowed by 0.6%, in agreement with little elevation change over this time • Places new constraints on multi-decadal changes of a large Antarctic ice shelf • Further info: King et al. [2007, 2009], JGR Earth Surface