1 / 20

OVERVIEW: USGS Streamgage Network Design

OVERVIEW: USGS Streamgage Network Design. USGS Streamgage Network e ffective combination to achieve high quality science based on reliable measurements and shared investment guided by national priorities. USGS Streamgaging History.

bette
Download Presentation

OVERVIEW: USGS Streamgage Network Design

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. OVERVIEW:USGS StreamgageNetwork Design

  2. USGS Streamgage Network effective combination to achieve high quality science based on reliable measurements and shared investmentguided by national priorities

  3. USGS Streamgaging History John Wesley Powell (USGS Director; 1881 – 1894) directed the USGS to begin monitoring streamflow in the west First USGS gage established in 1889 on the Rio Grande near Embudo, New Mexico By 1895, streamflow was being monitored by USGS personnel in 27 states (territories) Most stations in 1968 = 8,320 in operation In FY-2010, USGS was operating 7,845 Streamgages

  4. USGS Streamgage Network • Cooperative Water ProgramCWP = 3,300 streamgages in 2012(+750 interpretive studies) • National Streamflow Information ProgramNSIP= 4,500 streamgages in 2012 7,850 total USGS active streamgages effective combination to achieve high quality science based on reliable measurements and shared investmentguided by national priorities

  5. Cooperative Water Program CWP Mission:to provide reliable, impartial, and timely information needed to understand the Nation's water resources through a program of shared efforts and funding with state, tribal, and local partners to enable decision makers to wisely manage the Nation's water resources.

  6. Cooperative Water Program • CWP= hydrologic data+ investigative studies • Program started as a 50:50 cost-sharenot authorized by Congress, except for specific direction in annual federal appropriations legislation • Active in every state & most territories • Engages more than 1,500 cost-share “Cooperators” • Guided by national priorities

  7. Cooperative Water Program • CWP= hydrologic data+ investigative studies • Data collection by USGS maintaining high QA/QCAccessible to all without chargeConsistent, Reliable & Available 24x7x365 • Data & studies are limited by funding, but Cooperators are paying 2x the funds USGS gets • Competitive selection applying national priorities • USGS scientists get direct involvement in latest challenges • Cooperators get impartial science expertise from a national agency that has no regulatory function

  8. National Streamflow Information Program (NSIP) • Requested by Congress in 1998USGS design was reviewed by NAS/NRC in 2004NSIP was authorized by Congress in 2009 • Program concept is to establish a reliablenational “backbone” streamgage network to meet 5 specific, national needs andprovide benchmark for other’s monitoring • Design = Network of 4,780 streamgages Strategic locations across America to Supplement existing streamgage networks Reliable + Continuous  Federal Funded

  9. National Research Council Review • 2004 review of USGS design for NSIP • 2007 review of USGS River Science • 2009 review of USGS Water Program • New science and more data are neededby federal, state, tribal, interstate and local officials to effectively manage watertowards sustainable ends • American water community needs anational leader in water sciences • Favorable review of USGS operations, science capabilities and NSIP design

  10. National Streamflow Information Program • Reliable national streamgage network to meet5 specific, national needs • Design =network of 4,780 monitoring sitesReliable + Continuous  Federal FundedActual = 4,500 operating, but 87% lack reliable funding in FY-2013 (i.e., depend on CWP & Cooperators, which defeats the intent of NSIP) • A fully implemented NSIP would require$115 M to complete and $110 M/yrto operate

  11. Active NSIP Gages

  12. Total NSIP + CWP Streamgages

  13. Questions?? effective combination to achieve high quality science based on reliable measurements and shared investmentguided by national priorities Contact ICWP/Peter Evanswww.icwp.org (703) 243-7383 or phe@riverswork.com

  14. USGS Streamgage Network effective combination to achieve high quality science based on reliable measurements and shared investmentguided by national priorities • Cooperative Water Programwithout the cost-share investmentfederal government would not have adequate coverage • National Streamflow Information Programwithout reliable funding for the set of “backbone” streamgagesfederal government loses long-term records needed toidentify trends and support interpretive science 7,850 total USGS active streamgages providing the benchmark needed by USGS and other agencies

  15. Stakeholder Support Coalition • Organized by Interstate Council on Water Policy with help from: • Western States Water Council • Association of State Floodplain Managers • American Society of Civil Engineers • National Water Resources Association • American Rivers • National Wildlife Federation • The Nature Conservancy

  16. Stakeholder Support Coalition • Focused effort to inform the Administration (Interior & OMB) and Congress • 53 organizations endorsed our 2013 letters

  17. 2013 Stakeholder Coalition • American Canoe Association • American Rivers • American Society of Civil Engineers • American Water Resources Association • American Water Works Association • American Whitewater • Appalachian Mountain Club • Association of American State Geologists • Association of California Water Agencies • Association of Metropolitan Water Agencies • Association of State Dam Safety Officials • Association of State Floodplain Managers • Association of Clean Water Administrators • Bear River Commission • California Sportfishing Protection Alliance • Coastal States Organization • Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Forum • Colorado Water Congress • Delaware River Basin Commission • Environmental Defense Fund • International Federation of Fly Fishers • Great Lakes Commission • Hydropower Reform Coalition • Idaho Rivers United • Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin • Interstate Council on Water Policy • Irrigation Association • Missouri River Association of States & Tribes • National Association of Clean Water Agencies • National Association of Flood & Stormwater Management Agencies • National Association of State Boating Law Administrators • National Drought Mitigation Center • National Hydropower Association • National Water Resources Association • National Wildlife Federation • The Nature Conservancy • New England Interstate Water Pollution Control Commission • Ohio River Valley Water Sanitation Commission • Oregon Water Resources Congress • Pennsylvania Environmental Council • Pennsylvania Organization of Watersheds & Rivers • Rivers Alliance of Connecticut • River Network • Susquehanna River Basin Commission • Texas Water Conservation Association • Trout Unlimited • Trout Unlimited, Pennsylvania Council • Upper Colorado River Compact Commission • Upper Mississippi River Basin Association • Water Environment Federation • Western States Water Council • Yellowstone River Compact Commission

  18. USGS Streamgage Network effective combination to achieve high quality science based on reliable measurements and shared investmentguided by national priorities

More Related