300 likes | 1.07k Views
Refusal of Medical Assistance. Informed ConsentRefusal of CareCase ReviewElements of Informed ConsentMatrix of Transport DecisionsPatient RestraintNon-Transport of PatientsGeneral GuidelinesClark County ProtocolsOther Refusal IssuesEMS No-CPRPOLST. Informed Consent. Informed ConsentIntegral to the concept of informed refusalProtects the medical decision making autonomy of the individualAllows for information exchange between patient and provider to help individual make educated hea9445
E N D
1. Refusal of Medical Assistance Lynn K. Wittwer, MD, MPD
Clark County EMS
2. Refusal of Medical Assistance Informed Consent
Refusal of Care
Case Review
Elements of Informed Consent
Matrix of Transport Decisions
Patient Restraint
Non-Transport of Patients
General Guidelines
Clark County Protocols
Other Refusal Issues
EMS No-CPR
POLST
3. Informed Consent Informed Consent
Integral to the concept of informed refusal
Protects the medical decision making autonomy of the individual
Allows for information exchange between patient and provider to help individual make educated health care decisions
History
1982 - Making Health Care Decisions (Presidents Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine)
“shared decision making” would be “the ideal for patient-professional relationships that a sound doctrine of informed consent should support.”
4. Informed Consent History [even earlier] (cont.)
1914 – Justice Cardoza “Every human being of adult years and sound mind has a right to determine what shall be done with his own body.”
1960 – Natanson v. Kline – physicians are obligated to disclose and explain in simple language, the risks and complications of a procedure.
5. Informed Consent History (cont.)
1972 – Cobbs v. Grant The patients right of self decision is the measure of the physicians duty to reveal.
Physician is obligated to provide all information necessary to allow patient to make informed decision.
6. Dilemma Patient unable to make informed decision and refusing care and/or transport
7. Refusal of Care Competence vs. capacity
Competence – 3 step legal test determined by judge in court of law
Can individual retain and comprehend relevant information?
Can individual believe information?
Can individual use information to make a choice?
8. Refusal of Care Competence vs. capacity (cont.)
Capacity – Can be established by medical provider
Presumptive determination of competence
If a patient refuses and evidence exists indicating an impairment of the patient’s capacities, it is appropriate to conclude the patient may be found incompetent in a court of law.
Impairment may be determined by;
Patients own actions
Information from caregivers and/or relatives
9. Refusal of Care Establishing capacity
Does the patient understand the nature of his medical condition and the potential consequences of refusing treatment and/or transport?
Assessment of decision making capacity
Absence of deficits in:
Cognition
Judgment
Understanding
Choice
Expression of choice
Stability
10. The EMS provider must realize the patient’s decision making capacity must be scrutinized, not the ultimate decision regarding health care
If deemed to posses capacity, the patient’s wishes regarding health care must be honored.
11. Refusal of Care Disagreement with provider does itself constitute lack of capacity
Lane v. Candura – Court ruling supporting patient right to determine treatment
Patient refusing treatment despite physician advice
Court ruled the irrationality of the decision did not justify a conclusion of incompetence.
12. Elements of Informed Consent ACDC
Autonomous decision
Capable individual
Disclosure of adequate information by provider
Comprehension of the information by individual
13. Elements of Informed Consent Determining comprehension
“Sliding Scale” standard
The more serious the risk posed by the patient’s decision the more stringent the standard of comprehension (capacity) required.
Refusal of EMS transport to hospital typically considered “high risk”.
14. Matrix of Transport Decisions
15. Matrix of Transport Decisions Patient Refuses – EMS Disagrees
True refusal of medical assistance
Key issue is EMS advises of need for tx/trnx and patient refuses despite understanding risks
Patient Wishes Transport – EMS Disagrees
Significant EMS liability
Impossible to justify failure to tx/trnx if patient has adverse outcome.
16. Matrix of Transport Decisions Patient Refuses – EMS Agrees
Example: MVA where patient did not call
Patient and EMS agree that no illness/injury (and therefore risk) exist.
Does not apply if patient care is initiated:
Taking of vitals
Provision of diagnosis
Reassurance patient is “OK”
17. Patient Restraint Issues – Patient Refusal and Restraint
False Imprisonment
Restraint without proper justification or authority
Intentional and unjustifiable detention of an individual without his consent
Assault and Battery
Assault
Unlawfully placing an individual in apprehension of immediate body harm without consent
Battery
Unlawfully touching an individual without consent
18. Patient Restraint Issues – Patient Refusal and Restraint (cont.)
Abandonment
Premature termination of the Paramedic/Patient relationship
Failure to follow necessary steps to ensure definitive care
Reasonable force
Dependant on amount of force required to ensure patient does not cause injury to himself or others
Excessive force is EMS liability
19. Non-Transport of PatientsGeneral Guidelines Reasons for Non-Transport
Signed ‘Refusal for Transport’
No Patient
DOA and other DIF
Termination of Code 99
No patient found at scene
Etc.
20. Non-Transport of PatientsGeneral Guidelines Patients Refusing Care/Transport Defined:
No medical need
Normal decision making capacity
Voluntarily declines after being informed
Impaired decision making capacity
Impaired Decision Making Capacity
Inability to understand nature of illness/injury
Inability to understand risks or consequences of refusing
21. Non-Transport of PatientsGeneral Guidelines Impaired Decision Making Capacity (cont.)
Some causes of impairment:
Alcohol/drugs
Psychiatric conditions
Injuries (head injury, shock, etc.)
OBS (Alzheimers, mental handicap, etc.)
Minors (<18 years old)
Language/communication barrier (incl. deafness)
22. Non-Transport of PatientsGeneral Guidelines Criteria For Informed Consent/Refusal:
Patient is given complete/accurate information about risks for refusal and benefit of treatment
Patient is able to understand and communicate these risks and benefits
Patient is able to make a decision consistent with their beliefs and life goals
23. Clark County Prehospital Guidelines for Patients Refusing Care Capable Of Making Decision – No Medical Need
Refusal form not necessary
Document events necessitating call and criteria for no patient/medical need
24. Clark County Prehospital Guidelines for Patients Refusing Care Capable Of Making Decision – Minor Medical Need
Refusal form IS necessary
Documentation shall include following:
Chief complaint
Events prior/reason for call
Pertinent medical history
Description of scene (if relevant)
Physical exam incl. vitals and impression
Treatment provided and patient response
Consult information
Instructions/Information provided to patient/family re. risks/benefits of treatment
25. Clark County Prehospital Guidelines for Patients Refusing Care Capable of Making Decision – Immediate Care/Transport Needed
Refusal Form IS Necessary
Efforts to convince patient to receive care:
Assistance from family, etc.
Law enforcement, mental health professional (CDMHP), clergy, etc.
Consult with MC is mandatory
Explain Refusal Form
Instructions and release of libility to the patient
Signature of patient or legal guardian
Signature by witness
26. Clark County Prehospital Guidelines for Patients Refusing Care NOT Capable – Medical Care/Transport Necessary
Refusal Form Necessary
Efforts to convince pt. to accept care
Assistance from family, police, CDMHP, clergy, etc.
Consider restraint
Chemical
Physical
Consult with Medical Control Mandatory
Explain Refusal Form
Instructions and release of liability to the patient
Signature of patient or legal guardian
Signature by witness
Every reasonable effort should be made to ensure pt. receives medical assistance
Use aforementioned documentation guidelines
27. Clark County Prehospital Guidelines for Patients Refusing Care Completing Clark County Refusal Form
Determine Capacity
Document in assessment section
Consider as prompts for documenting MIR
28. Clark County Prehospital Guidelines for Patients Refusing Care Completing Clark County Refusal Form (cont.)
Contact Medical Control
Document MD, orders given, and other pertinent dialogue
Indicate any instructions to patient via MC Physician
If MC not contacted, document reason in MIR
29. Clark County Prehospital Guidelines for Patients Refusing Care Completing Clark County Refusal Form (cont.)
Document advise to patient
Treatment eval needed
Further harm could result without
Transport needed
30. Clark County Prehospital Guidelines for Patients Refusing Care Completing Clark County Refusal Form (cont.)
Indicate Disposition
Refused all
Refused tx and/or trnx
In Custody
Document agency and officer
In care of relative or friend
Document name and relationship
Sign and Date Form
31. Clark County Prehospital Guidelines for Patients Refusing Care Completing Clark County Refusal Form (cont.)
Explain remainder of form to patient
Pt. sign and date release of liability
32. Other Refusal Issues EMS No-CPR
Directive for No CPR
Pt. pulseless and apneic
Born of Natural Death Act
Allowed EMS to respect pt’s end of life wishes
Limited to Prehospital Providers
Not transportable
Required continuous updating
Nobody wants to wear the dead man walking bracelet
33. EMS No-CPR Guidelines
Perform interventions until confirmation of the EMS-No CPR status in one of the following ways:
Determine bracelet is intact and not defaced.
Original form present.
bedside, back of door, or refrigerator.
patient's chart.
If bracelet is not attached, or if it has been defaced and no valid EMS-No CPR form is located, the EMS-No CPR bracelet must be considered invalid
34. EMS No-CPR Patient Obviously Dead
Decapitation
Rigor Mortis
Evisceration of heart or brain
Decomposition
Incineration
Resuscitation measures shall not be initiated.
35. EMS No-CPR After confirming valid EMS-No CPR
Do Not begin resuscitation measures
PROVIDE COMFORT CARE
Contact patient’s physician or Medical Control with questions or problems
If resuscitation already started before learning of a valid EMS-No CPR STOP the following:
Basic CPR.
Intubation (leave tube in place, stop ppv).
Cardiac monitoring and defibrillation.
Administration of resuscitation medications.
Any positive pressure ventilation (through bag valve masks, pocket face masks, endotracheal tubes).
36. EMS No-CPR Comfort Care Measures
Comfort care for the dying patient may include:
Manually open airway (do not provide ppv with a bag valve mask, pocket mask or endotracheal tube).
Clear airway (including stoma).
Provide oxygen via nasal cannula at 2-4lpm
Place patient in position of comfort
Splint and control bleeding as necessary
Treat pain as per protocol
Provide emotional support to patient and family
37. EMS No-CPR Revoking the valid DNR order.
The following people can inform the EMS system that the EMS-No CPR form has been revoked:
The patient
The Attending Physician.
The legal surrogate for the patient expressing the patient's revocation of the directive
38. Note: The patient's wishes in regard to resuscitation should always be respected. Sometimes, however, the family may vigorously and persistently insist on CPR even if a valid DNR directive/order… Advanced life support personnel should continue treatment and consult medical control
39. EMS No-CPR Documentation
Complete MPD approved MIR.
State in writing:
"Patient identified as DNR by EMS-No CPR, or Other directive.”
Record Attending Physician and whether or not contacted.
Record reason why the EMS system was activated.
Comfort the family and bystanders when patients have expired.
40. EMS No-CPR Case Review
Called by husband to 66 y/o female cc SOB
Pt. progressively non-verbal, nods appropriately to questioning
PMH – COPD, IDDM, etc.
valid, signed EMS No-CPR
ETCO2 50, O2 sat 90, lung sounds slight all fields w/ minimal excursion
41. EMS No-CPR Case Review (cont.)
Pt. asked “Do you want us to breathe for you”
Non-verbal, shakes head ‘No’
Indicates again she doesn’t want respiratory assistance
Upon transfer to ambulance patient becomes obtunded, GCS 3, apneic
What are current treatment options?
42. Other Refusal Issues Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST)
Replaces current EMS-No CPR Code directions
Offers same immunity as EMS No-CPR
Translates an Advanced Directive into physician orders.
NOTE: POLST is NOT an Advance Directive and DOES NOT replace
43. POLST Part A
Resuscitation
Only applicable if pulseless and apneic
Part B
Medical interventions
Comfort Measures
Limited interventions
O2, suction, FBAO removal
Advanced interventions
BVM w/ NPA/OPA
Monitor
Medications/IV Fluids
Full Treatment/Resuscitation
44. POLST Part C
Antibiotics
Part D
Artificially administered fluids and nutrition
Part E
Signatures
All must be present and dated
Part F
Patient preference
Indicates further living will, identifies guardian, etc.
Part G
Review of POLST form
45. POLST Qualified
18 or older
Serious health condition
Location of Form
Home
Fridge, bedside, back of door, with meds
Health Care Setting
Chart
Kept with patient during transfer
46. POLST Revocation of Form
By PATIENT
Verbally revoking order
Destroying form and/or No CPR bracelet
Physician expressing patient’s revocation
Legal surrogate
47. POLST Management
Provide resuscitation based on patient’s wishes
Provide medical intervention identified on form
Always provide comfort care
If In Doubt Contact Medical Control
48. POLST Comfort Care Measures
Open/clear airway
No PPV
Oxygen via nasal cannula
Position of comfort
Splint, control bleeding
Pain medication prn
Emotional support to patient and family
49. POLST Documentation
Complete approved MIR
Indicate DNR by POLST, EMS-No CPR, or other
Record pt’s physician
Indicate why EMS activated…?
Document contact with:
Medical control
Pt’s physician
Medical examiner/law enforcement