1 / 12

Experience with Inspection in Ultralarge-Scale Developments

Experience with Inspection in Ultralarge-Scale Developments. Glen Russell IEEE Software Jan91 Text pp422-428. Defects/KLOC. Caper Jones suggested what value? Bell-Northern eliminated how many?. Inspection Pace. Defects per person-hour Figure 2 – inspection pace Defect/KLOC vs LOC/hour.

Download Presentation

Experience with Inspection in Ultralarge-Scale Developments

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Experience with Inspection in Ultralarge-Scale Developments Glen Russell IEEE Software Jan91 Text pp422-428

  2. Defects/KLOC • Caper Jones suggested what value? • Bell-Northern eliminated how many?

  3. Inspection Pace • Defects per person-hour • Figure 2 – inspection pace • Defect/KLOC vs LOC/hour

  4. Inspection vs Testing • Operational defects/proghour in testing vs inspection • Figure 3 p 425

  5. Why not pre-testing?

  6. Key Lessons in Achieving Widespread Inspection Use Robert Grady and Tom Van Slack IEEE Software July 94 Text pp 429-440

  7. Useful results in the articles? • What statistics were relevant? • ROI • What advice was good?

  8. Adoption Rates • Fig 1 pp430 • Four phases • Experimental • Initial guidelines • Widespread belief • Standardization

  9. Extent of Adoption Metric • Sidebar p438

  10. Estimated Savings • Sidebar p439

  11. Formal Inspections - WWW • NASA- satc.gsfc.nasa.gov • NASA Inspections - satc.gsfc.nasa.gov/Documents/fi/fipage.html • FTR page -www.ics.hawaii.edu/~johnson/FTR

  12. L11bS12 Individual Task • Build a checklist for Test Plans • Conduct a formal technical review on dag’s test plan for B&B • Turn/fax in a checklist and report • 15 points – due Thursday, 7/12 (on) • Monday, 7/16 (off)

More Related