1 / 13

WP 6 progress

WP 6 progress. Cefas, Imperial (IC), AZTI, JRC (all participants) San Seb – Sep 2008. Objectives. Numerically describe fishers’ responses to (i) alternative enforcement regimes and (ii) changes in enforcement intensity

bevis-hopper
Download Presentation

WP 6 progress

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. WP 6 progress Cefas, Imperial (IC), AZTI, JRC (all participants) San Seb – Sep 2008

  2. Objectives • Numerically describe fishers’ responses to (i) alternative enforcement regimes and (ii) changes in enforcement intensity • Evaluate potential consequences of alternative regimes combined with other fisheries management methods • Be used afterwards

  3. Team • CEFAS: overall responsibility for software and “architecture” • IC: modules for calculating new functions (penalty prob.; enforcement cost) • AZTI: links FLR to databases • JRC: testing solutions for less experienced users (web access version)

  4. Progress so far Version 1.4 (initial version as presented at the London progress meeting) 1. Input of enforcement effort – cost data and enforcement effort - probability of detecting infringement (π(e)) data, and fit appropriate models; • Users can define their own effort – cost, effort - π(e) relationships • Graphical illustration of the fitted relationships and data / user defined relationships 2. Investigate the quantitative relationships between costs and benefits (social benefits, private profits, level of harvesting) with changing system parameters and variables • Customise the COBECOS object to any given case study (e.g. fines, lambda) • Optimise for the most socially beneficial combination of enforcement efforts • Include stochasticity in the prediction of illegal harvest, social benefits and private benefits • Visualise the effect of all model parameters on the level of social or private benefits

  5. Outputs(1)

  6. Outputs(2)

  7. New version Version 1.5 • Generic code – both social benefit and private benefit can be changed • New concise manual • Modified slot names • Code more efficient

  8. Uptake: implementation Enforcement effort Cost versus prob of infringements Shadow value of biomass SOCIAL BENEFITS

  9. Progress so far

  10. Summary • Tutorial meeting in London • Prototype has been delivered • Moving into maintenance phase • Looking for feedback from users • Do all Case Studies need to use it (even if they have implemented their own version)?

More Related