1 / 15

IPY SAR Acquisition Strategy Coordination Meeting Summary

This document summarizes the outcomes and objectives discussed at the IPY SAR Acquisition Strategy Coordination Meeting held on Feb. 3-4, 2009, in Geneva. The meeting aimed to develop a strategy for SAR and InSAR data acquisition to achieve IPY science objectives. Key points include assessment of SAR system capacity, distribution of acquisition load, and coordination among space agencies. Relevant highlights and guidelines for SAR acquisition plan consolidation, processing strategy, and data dissemination are provided.

billiel
Download Presentation

IPY SAR Acquisition Strategy Coordination Meeting Summary

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Space Task Group of the IPY Sub-Committee on Observations AN ACQUISITION STRATEGY FOR SAR AND INSAR COORDINATED RESPONSE OF THE SPACE AGENCIES TO IPY SCIENCE OBJECTIVESYves CrevierCanadian Space Agency STG 4GenevaFeb. 3 – 4, 2009 RSAT 2 ScanSAR Wide A – 2008.05.11Banks Island, Beaufort SeaRSAT-2 Scansar Wide

  2. Contributors • SAR Space Agencies • Agenzia Spaziale Italiana – Fabrizio Battazza • Canadian Space Agency – Yves Crevier, Robert Saint-Jean • DLR, Germand Aerospace Center – Manfred Gottwald, Dana Floricioiu, et al. • European Space Agency – Henri Laur • JAXA – Masanobu Shimada • NASA – Craig Dobson • STG members • Mark Drinkwater • Ken Jezek, Katy Farness • Private sector and International organisations • MDA, ASF, KSAT, GIIPSY, WMO JC

  3. SAR Agency IPY Portfolios • http://bprc.osu.edu/rsl/GIIPSY/

  4. September 2007 • In response to an action: • STG2 – A9 - Action on CSA - to set up an inter-agency meeting of SAR mission managers to optimise SAR coverage - in order to address top level scientific objectives/requirements stated in the GIIPSY User requirements document. • Objectives: • Develop an acquisition strategy for SAR and InSAR data that achieves the maximum number of IPY science objectives • Distribute the acquisition load across the different agencies ENVISAT ASAR Mosaic

  5. Path Towards SAR Coordination • Assessment of SAR system capacity vs IPY science objectives – meeting 1 • SAR acquisition plan consolidation exercise – meeting 2 • SAR processing strategy • Data dissemination - sustainability

  6. Assessment of SAR system capacity vs IPY science objectives • Review existing GIIPSY science requirements (the Global Inter-agency IPY Polar Snapshot Year (GIIPSY) Strategy Document) • Review the Agencies strategic priorities in line with IPY science activities. • Review current acquisition plans focused on IPY. • Review the satellite and ground segment operators system capabilities and constraints related to the acquisition of data in support to IPY. • Agree on priorities

  7. SAR Coordination MeetingMarch 08 • 13 organisations were represented at this meeting • 6 Space Agencies • 3 Ground Segment Operators • 4 end-user and research organizations • Presentation material available on the GIIPSY website

  8. Meeting Outcomes • Agreement to focus the acquisition strategy on: • Solving important science problem (in line with STG objectives) • Filling a gap in planned coverage for IPY (build from existing agencies’ imaging activities) • Involve interagency collaboration (no-single agency can do it all)

  9. Derived Contribution From SAR • C-Band coverage (3-day snapshots) for the Arctic Ocean during the remainder of IPY (background missions, operation data acquisitions, etc.). • Winter Pole to Coast InSAR coverage of the Antarctic in high-resolution mode (3-4 consecutive cycles in ascending and descending). • Greenland and Major Canadian Icefields of InSAR acquisition over 3-4 consecutive cycles of high-resolution in winter. • Supersites (where possible using what exists already): determine acquisition parameters (frequency, resolution, etc.) for multi-polarisation and polarimetry data collection.

  10. User Requirements Guidelines

  11. SAR acquisition plan consolidation exercise • Avoid Gaps and Overlaps – optimize resources • Consolidate the current SAR planning and imaging activities occurring under the auspices of IPY/STG (i.e. thematic / instrument matrix, common planning tool, etc.) • Distribute imaging load according to Agencies’ capacities and priorities, and develop acquisition plans • Look at a short/med/long term planning approach to continue the acquisitions (if at all possible)

  12. Space Task Group Coordination

  13. SAR processing strategy and data dissemination • Definition of priorities • A Data Processing Strategy for Satellite Data Collected During the IPY – K. Jezek, GIIPSY • Develop a processing strategy that will use the existing agency resources (from signal to data archive) • Coordinate funding opportunities for science initiative and private sector involvement for the development of derived products TerraSAR X Strip Map Dual Pol East Greenland, 12-12-07

  14. Dissemination • Development of an outreach strategy to demonstrate the leverage of coordination under STG. • Joint technical paper • Presentation of compiled results in selected forums • Compile links of data nodes and portfolio description for space agencies • Promote our joint / integrated products • GIIPSY

More Related