180 likes | 285 Views
LC TPC DAQ. Ron Settles – Desy/MPI-Munich (see also foils by Guenter Eckerlin, and with the help of Nabil Ghodbane, Stefan Roth, Paul Colas and many others of the LC TPC group) Contents the LC TPC some of the technical issues some of the daq issues a model for the LC TPCdata rates.
E N D
LC TPC DAQ Ron Settles – Desy/MPI-Munich (see also foils by Guenter Eckerlin, and with the help of Nabil Ghodbane, Stefan Roth, Paul Colas and many others of the LC TPC group) Contents the LC TPC some of the technical issues some of the daq issues a model for the LC TPCdata rates LC TPC DAQ Issues -- Cornell LC Workshop July 2003
LC Note update to LC-DET-2002-008 being written… LC TPC DAQ Issues -- Cornell LC Workshop July 2003
some foils courtesy Stefan Roth LC TPC DAQ Issues -- Cornell LC Workshop July 2003
(some foil courtesy Nabil Ghodbane) LC TPC DAQ Issues -- Cornell LC Workshop July 2003
Model for LC TPC DAQ studies • data rate determined by backgrounds • 1.3 · 10⁶ pads X 1000 t.b. = 1.3 · 10⁹ voxels ( 1 voxel ≡1 word ) • 0.3% background occupancy (TDR value) in one TPC ‘picture’ (one ‘picture’ ≡ 50µsec drift time) • ⇒ 0.39·10⁷ words in 50µsec, i.e., 150 BX (Tesla) or 192 BX (NLC) • For words/sec, multiply by 100 (20 pict./train X 5 train/s) for Tesla or 120 (train/s) for NLC • ⇒ 0.39·10⁹ words/sec for Tesla and NLC, • i.e., 80Mwords/train for Tesla or 3Mwords/train for NLC • ⇒ 4 Gbit/sec for Tesla and NLC with a 10-bit digitizer • CMS designing for 50-500Gbit/sec, so that DAQ SF (safety factor) ≈ 10-100, i.e. that much more background tolerable in TPC from DAQ point of view… LC TPC DAQ Issues -- Cornell LC Workshop July 2003