1 / 8

The maze of classification based on ethnicity: is there a solution?

The maze of classification based on ethnicity: is there a solution?. Chantal Davies (Senior Lecturer, University of Chester). Objectives. Background Categorisation and ethnicity Conclusions: application to future research. Background.

birch
Download Presentation

The maze of classification based on ethnicity: is there a solution?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The maze of classification based on ethnicity: is there a solution? Chantal Davies (Senior Lecturer, University of Chester)

  2. Objectives • Background • Categorisation and ethnicity • Conclusions: application to future research

  3. Background • The 2011 BME Experience Project (Davies & Garrett, 2011) • Nature of the project • Use of broad generic terminology • Self-identification • Problems • The ‘Employability’ research • Background • Importance of ‘race wrestling’ (Pollock, 2004)

  4. Categorisation and ethnicity: introduction • The need for classification • Tool of emancipation? (Urla, 1993) • Tool of oppression? (Bonnett & Carrington, 2000) • Higher Education and ethnic monitoring (Bird, 1996; Connolly, 1994)

  5. Categorisation and ethnicity: general terminology • Race/ethnicity • The politicisation and decline of ‘black’ • Use of umbrella terminology • Black • BME • Ethnic minority • Minority ethnic

  6. Categorisation and ethnicity: pan-ethnic and specific categorisation • Use of pan-ethnic terms • Specific terminology: • The problem of ‘White’ • Conceptual confusion (Burton et al, 2010) • Imposed or self-categorisation

  7. Conclusions: application to future research • Multiplicity of ethnicity (Nazroo & Karlsen, 2003) • Open ended questions on dimensions of ethnicity • The importance of ‘race wrestling’ • Position as a non-BME researcher (Howarth, 2002)

  8. References • Bird, J. (1996). Black Students and Higher Education. Buckingham: Open University Press. • Bonnett, A., & Carrington, B. (2000). Fitting into categories or falling between them? Rethinking ethnic classification. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 21(4), 487-500. • Burton, J., & Nandi, A., & Platt, L. (2010). Measuring ethnicity: challenges and opportunities for survey research. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 33(8), 1332-1349. • Connolly, C. (1994). Shades of Discrimination: University Entry Data 1990-92, in: S Haselgrove (Ed.). The Student Experience. (Buckingham, SRHE/Open University). • Davies, C., & Garrett, M. (2012). The BME student experience at a small northern university: an examination of the experiences of minority ethnic students undertaking undergraduate study within a small northern university. Compass: The Journal of Learning and Teaching at the University of Greenwich, 5, 57-66. • Howarth, C. (2002). Using the theory of social representations to explore difference in the research relationship. Qualitative Research, 2(1), 21-34. • Nazroo, J., & Karlsen, S. (2003). Patterns of identity among ethnic minority people: Diversity and commonality. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 26(5), 902-930. • Pollock, M. (2004). Race wrestling: struggling strategically with race in educational practice and research. American Journal of Education, 111, 25-67. • Urla, J. (1993). Cultural politics in an age of statistics: numbers, nations, and the making of Basque identity. American Ethnologist, 20(4), 818-843.

More Related