200 likes | 215 Views
Discover the profound mathematical roots in Asia with the Euclidean Algorithm, Chinese Remainder Theorem, and Pell’s Equation. From practical applications to historical insights, unravel the brilliance of ancient number theory.
E N D
Chapter 4Number Theory in Asia • The Euclidean Algorithm • The Chinese Remainder Theorem • Linear Diophantine Equations • Pell’s Equation in Brahmagupta • Pell’s Equation in Bhâskara II • Rational Triangles • Biographical Notes: Brahmagupta and Bhâskara
5.1 The Euclidean Algorithm • Major results known in ancient China and India (independently) • Pythagorean theorem and triples • Concept of π • Euclidean algorithm (China, Han dynasty,200 BCE – 200 CE) • Practical applications of Euclidean algorithm • Chinese remainder theorem • India: solutions of linear Diophantine equations and Pell’s equation
5.2 The Chinese Remainder Theorem • Example: find a number that leaves remainder 2 on division by 3, rem. 3 on div. by 5, and rem. 2 on div. by 7 • In terms of congruencies:x ≡ 2 mod 3, x ≡ 3 mod 5, x ≡ 2 mod 7 • Solution: x = 23 • “General method” - Mathematical Manual by Sun Zi(late 3rd century CE): • If we count by threes and there is a remainder 2, put down 140 • If we count by fives and there is a remainder 3, put down 63 • If we count by seven and there is a remainder 2, put down 30 • Add them to obtain 233 and subtract 210 to get the answer
Explanation • 140 = 4 x (5 x 7) leaves remainder 2 on division by 3 and remainder 0 on division by 5 and 7 • 63 = 3 x (3 x 7) leaves remainder 3 on division by 5 and remainder 0 on division by 3 and 7 • 30 = 2 x (3 x 5) leaves remainder 2 on division by 3 and remainder 0 on division by 5 and 7 • Therefore their sum 233 leaves remainders 2, 5, and 2 on division by 3, 5, and 7, respectively • Subtract integral multiple of 3 x 5 x 7 = 105 to obtain the smallest solution:233 – 2 x 105 = 233 – 210 = 23 • Question: Why do we choose 140, 63 and 30 (or, more precisely 4, 3 and 2)?
Sun Zi: • If we count by threes and there is a remainder 1, put down 70 • If we count by fives and there is a remainder 1, put down 21 • If we count by seven and there is a remainder 1, put down 15 • We have: • 70 = 2 x (5 x 7) – smallest multiple of 5 and 7 leaving remainder 1 on division by 3 • Multiply it by 2 to get remainder 2 on division by 3:140 = 2 x 70 = 2 x 2 (5 x 7) = 4 (5 x 7)
Inverses modulo p • Definitionb is called inverse of a modulo p if ab ≡ 1 mod p • Examples: • 2 is inverse of 3 modulo 5 • 3 is inverse of 3 modulo 8 • 2 is inverse of 35 modulo 3 • Does inverse of a modulo p exist ? • Example: does inverse of 4 modulo 6 exist? • If we had 4b ≡ 1 mod 6 then 4b – 1 were divisible by 6 and therefore 1 were divisible by 2 = gcd (4,6), which is impossible!
General method of finding inverses • Qin Jiushao, 1247 - used Euclidean algorithm to find inverses • Suppose ax = 1 mod p where x is unknown • Then ax – 1 = py ↔ ax - py = 1 • This equation has solutions if and only ifgcd (a,p) = 1 and in this case solutions can be found from Euclidean algorithm! • In particular, if p is prime then inverse always exist
Chinese remainder theorem • p1, p2, … pk - relatively prime integers, i.e. gcd (pi, pj) =1 for all i ≠ j • remainders: r1, r2, …, rk such that 0 ≤ri< pi • Then there exists integer n satisfying the system of k congruencies:n ≡ r1 mod p1n ≡ r2 mod p2.....................n ≡ rk mod pk
5.3 Linear Diophantine Equations • ax + by = c • Euclidean algorithm: • China: between 3rd century CE and 1247 (Qin Jiushao) • India: Âryabhata (499 CE) • Bhaskara I (India, 522) reduced problem to finding a’x + b’y = 1 where a’ = a / gcd (a,b) and b’ = b / gcd (a,b) • Criterion for an integer solution:Equation ax + by = c has an integer solution if and only if gcd (a,b) divides c
5.4 Pell’s Equation in Brahmagupta • China: development of algebra and approximate methods, integer solutions for linear equations, but not integer solutions for nonlinear equations • India: less progress in algebra but success in finding solutions of Pell’s equation:Brahmagupta “Brâhma-sphuta-siddhânta” 628 CE
Brahmagupta’s method • Pell’s equation: x2 – Ny2 = 1 • Method is based on Brahmagupta's discovery of identity: • Note: if we let N = -1 we obtain identity discovered by Diophantus:
Composition of triples • Consider equations(1) x2 – Ny2 = k1 and (2) x2 – Ny2 = k2 • x1, y1 – sol. of (1), x2, y2 – sol. of (2) • Then the identity implies thatx =x1x2+Ny1y2 and y =x1y2+x2y1 is a solution of x2 – Ny2 = k1 k2 • We therefore define composition of triples(x1, y1, k1 ) and (x2, y2, k2 ) equal to the triple(x1x2+Ny1y2, x1y2+x2y1, k1 k2 ) • Thus if k1= k2 =1 one can obtain arbitrary large solutions ofx2 – Ny2 = 1 (e.g. start from some obvious solution and compose it with itself)
Moreover… • It turns out that we can obtain solutions of x2 – Ny2 = 1 composing solutions of x2 – Ny2 = k1 and x2 – Ny2 = k2 even when k1,k2 > 1 • Indeed: composing (x1, y1, k1 ) with itself gives integer solution of x2 – Ny2 = (k1 )2 and hence rational solution of x2 – Ny2 = 1 • Example (Brahmagupta: “a person solving this problem within a year is a mathematician”)x2 – 92y2 = 1 • Consider “auxiliary” equation x2 – 92y2 = 8 • It has obvious solution (10, 1, 8) • Composing it with itself we get (192, 20, 64) which is a solution of x2 – 92y2 = 82 • Dividing both sides by 82 we obtain (24, 5/2, 1) which is a rational solution of x2 – 92y2 = 1 • Composing it with itself we get (1151, 120, 1) which means thatx = 1151, y = 120 is a solution of x2 – 92y2 = 1
5.5 Pell’s Equation in Bhâskara II • Brahmagupta: • invented composition of triples • proved that if x2 – Ny2 = k has an integer solution for k = 1, 2 ,4 then x2 – Ny2 = 1 has integer solution • Bhâskara: • first general method for solving the Pell equation (“Bîjaganita” 1150 CE) • method is based on Brahmagupta’s approach
Method of Bhâskara • Goal: find a non-trivial integer solution of x2 – Ny2 = 1 • Let a and b are relatively prime such that a2 – Nb2 = k • Consider trivial “equation” m2 – N x 12 = m2 – N • Compose triples (a, b, k) and (m, 1, m2-N) • We get (am + Nb, a+bm, k (m2 – N) ) • Dividing by k we get: ((am + Nb) / k, (a+bm) / k, (m2 – N) ) / k • Choose m so that (a+bm) / k = b1is an integer AND so thatm2 – N is as small as possible • It turns out that (am + Nb) / k = a1and (m2-N) / k = k1 are integers • Now we have (a1)2 – N (b1)2 = k1 • Repeat the same procedure to obtain k2and so on • The goal is to get ki = 1, 2 or 4 and use Brahmagupta’s method
Example • Consider x2 – 61y2 = 1 • Equation 82 – 61 x 12 = 3 gives (a, b, k) = (8, 1, 3) • Composing (8, 1, 3) with (m,1, m2 – 61) we get(8m + 61, 8+m, 3(m2 – 61)) • Dividing by 3 we get ( (8m + 61) / 3, (8+m) / 3, m2 – 6) • Letting m = 7 we get (39, 5, - 4) • (Brahmagupta) Dividing by 2 (since 4 = 22) we get(39/2, 5/2, -1) • Composing it with itself we get (1523 / 2, 195 /2, 1) • Composing it with (39/2, 5/2, -1) we get (29718, 3805, -1) • Composing it with itself we get (1766319049, 226153980, 1) which is a solution of x2 – 61y2 = 1 ! • In fact, it is the minimal nontrivial solution!
5.6 Rational Triangles • Definition A triangle is called rational if it has rational sides and rational area • Equivalently: rational sides and altitudes • Brahmagupta’s Theorem:Parameterization of rational trianglesIf a, b, c are sides of a rational triangle then for some rational numbers u, v and w we have:a = u2 / v + v, b = u2 / w + wc = u2 / v – v + u2 / w – w
Stronger Form • Any rational triangle is of the forma = (u2 + v2) / v, b = (u2 + w2) / wc = (u2 – v2 ) / v + (u2 –w2 ) / wfor some rational numbers u, v, w with the altitude h = 2usplitting side c into segments c1 = (u2 – v2 ) / v and c2 = (u2 – v2 ) / v
5.7 Biographical Notes:Brahmagupta and Bhâskara II • Brahmagupta (598 – (approx.) 665 CE) • “Brâhma-sphuta-siddhânta” • teacher from Bhillamâla (now Bhinmal, India) • prominent in astronomy and mathematics • Pell’s equation • general solution of quadratic equation • area of a cyclic quadrilateral (which generalizes Heron’s formula for the area of triangle) • parameterization of rational triangles
Bhâskara II (1114 – 1185) • greatest astronomer and mathematician in 12th-century India • head of the observatory at Ujjain • “Līlāvatī” (work named after his daughter)