1 / 9

Roadmap for EDXL Standards Denis Gusty, EDXL Project Manager

Roadmap for EDXL Standards Denis Gusty, EDXL Project Manager. September 30, 2009. EDXL Standards. Achieved much success in the development of messaging standards including: Common Alerting Protocol (CAP) Resource Messaging (RM) Distribution Element (DE)

blackm
Download Presentation

Roadmap for EDXL Standards Denis Gusty, EDXL Project Manager

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Roadmap for EDXL Standards Denis Gusty, EDXL Project Manager September 30, 2009

  2. EDXL Standards • Achieved much success in the development of messaging standards including: • Common Alerting Protocol (CAP) • Resource Messaging (RM) • Distribution Element (DE) • Hospital AVailability Exchange (HAVE) • Situation Reporting Standard • Information Tracking of Emergency Patients (ITEP)

  3. Problem Definition • No comprehensive view of the current state • What standards exist? • Who else is working on standards? • With whom do we need to coordinate? • Numerous standards and standards making bodies • Results in reinventing the wheel • No way to measure progress

  4. Gap Analysis • A Gap Analysis was conducted in 2008 to: • Assess the current state of data messaging standards • Identify a list of gaps between the information sharing business requirements of the emergency response community and the current state • Prioritize and develop future data messaging standards activities to support emergency response

  5. Approach

  6. Results Requirements Capabilities • General Alerting & Notification • Vehicular Emergency • Sensor Information • Situation Reporting • Incident Information/Updates • Resource Ordering and Acquisition • Resource Tracking and Monitoring • Resource Utilization/Facility Status • Patient/Victim Tracking • Credentialing of Responders • Traffic Information and Advisory • Weather Information and Forecasts • Geospatial • Criminal Information • Clinical Information

  7. Results • Researched standards for each information exchange requirement • High Level Results table presents findings at the Capability level • Based on lowest level in the Maturity of Standards model below

  8. High Level Results Table Note: Further validation/information is necessary to evaluate the gaps.

  9. Next Steps • Obtain Input and feedback on Standards Mapping from key stakeholders • SDOs and other organizations • Prioritize gaps with practitioners • Establish the EDXL standards development roadmap

More Related